Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV

GHSA-4qqc-mp5f-ccv4

GHSA-4qqc-mp5f-ccv4 is a remote code execution vulnerability in bestzip. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-4qqc-mp5f-ccv4 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Command Injection in bestzip

Published
Sep 2, 2020
Updated
Sep 2, 2020
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 2, 2020 · OSV.dev, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

71other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
bestzipnpm
563Kdownloads / week

Description

Versions of bestzip prior to 2.1.7 are vulnerable to Command Injection. The package fails to sanitize input rules and passes it directly to an exec call on the zip function . This may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code in the system as long as the values of destination is user-controlled. This only affects users with a native zip command available. The following examples demonstrate the issue from the CLI and also programatically:

  • bestzip test.zip 'sourcefile; mkdir folder'
  • zip({ source: 'sourcefile', destination: './test.zip; mkdir folder' })

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmbestzipall versions2.1.7

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for bestzip. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update bestzip to 2.1.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4qqc-mp5f-ccv4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-4qqc-mp5f-ccv4 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-4qqc-mp5f-ccv4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

Versions of `bestzip` prior to 2.1.7 are vulnerable to Command Injection. The package fails to sanitize input rules and passes it directly to an `exec` call on the `zip` function . This may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code in the system as long as the values of `destination` is user-controlled. This only affects users with a native `zip` command available. The following examples demonstrate the issue from the CLI and also programatically: - `bestzip test.zip 'sourcefile; mkdir folder'` - `zip({ source: 'sourcefile', destination: './test.zip; mkdir folder' })`
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-4qqc-mp5f-ccv4 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-4qqc-mp5f-ccv4 across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-4qqc-mp5f-ccv4: Command Injection in… | O3 Security