NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

Rekor affected by Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via provided public key URLGHSA-4c4x-jm2x-pf9j

MEDIUMFix: sigstore/rekor@60ef2bc

GHSA-4c4x-jm2x-pf9j is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in github.com/sigstore/rekor. A fix is available for github.com/sigstore/rekor — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-24117GO-2026-4355
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 3, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-4c4x-jm2x-pf9j.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs30th percentile — riskier than 30% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.29%0.58%0.87%0.0%0.4%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/sigstore/rekor

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

/api/v1/index/retrieve supports retrieving a public key via a user-provided URL, allowing attackers to trigger SSRF to arbitrary internal services.

Since the SSRF only can trigger GET requests, the request cannot mutate state. The response from the GET request is not returned to the caller so data exfiltration is not possible. A malicious actor could attempt to probe an internal network through Blind SSRF.

Impact

  • SSRF to cloud metadata (169.254.169.254)
  • SSRF to internal Kubernetes APIs
  • SSRF to any service accessible from Fulcio's network

Patches

Upgrade to v1.5.0. Note that this is a breaking change to the search API and fully disables lookups by URL. If you require this feature, please reach out and we can discuss alternatives.

Workarounds

Disable the search endpoint with --enable_retrieve_api=false.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/sigstore/rekorall versions1.5.0go get github.com/sigstore/rekor@v1.5.0

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
rekorlinuxfoundation
< 1.5.0
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/sigstore/rekor, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/sigstore/rekor to 1.5.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-4c4x-jm2x-pf9j is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-4c4x-jm2x-pf9j (CC BY 4.0)
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Openshift Data Foundation 4.22odf4/cephcsi-rhel9:1782932114RHSA-2026:37387

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `/api/v1/index/retrieve` supports retrieving a public key via a user-provided URL, allowing attackers to trigger SSRF to arbitrary internal services. Since the SSRF only can trigger GET requests, the request cannot mutate state. The response from the GET request is not returned to the caller so data exfiltration is not possible. A malicious actor could attempt to probe an internal network through [Blind SSRF](https://portswigger.net/web-security/ssrf/blind). ## Impact * SSRF to cloud metadata (169.254.169.254) * SSRF to internal Kubernetes APIs * SSRF to any service accessible f
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-4c4x-jm2x-pf9j in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

Rekor affected by Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via…