Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-49xc-52mp-cc9j

CRITICAL

GHSA-49xc-52mp-cc9j is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.1) CWE-1284 vulnerability in nimiq-blockchain. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-49xc-52mp-cc9j is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

nimiq-blockchain is missing a wall-clock upper bound on block timestamps

Also known asCVE-2026-40093
Published
Apr 10, 2026
Updated
Apr 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
None yet
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Apr 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🦀nimiq-blockchain

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Block timestamp validation enforces that timestamp >= parent.timestamp for non-skip blocks and timestamp == parent.timestamp + MIN_PRODUCER_TIMEOUT for skip blocks, but there is no visible upper bound check against the wall clock. A malicious block-producing validator can set block timestamps arbitrarily far in the future. This directly affects reward calculations via Policy::supply_at() and batch_delay() in blockchain/src/reward.rs, inflating the monetary supply beyond the intended emission schedule.

Patches

TBD

Workarounds

No know workarounds.

Affected Packages

1 total
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.ionimiq-blockchainall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nimiq-blockchain. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Remediation status

    No patched version of nimiq-blockchain has shipped for GHSA-49xc-52mp-cc9j yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.

  3. Mitigate without a patch

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-49xc-52mp-cc9j is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-49xc-52mp-cc9j. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Block timestamp validation enforces that `timestamp >= parent.timestamp` for non-skip blocks and `timestamp == parent.timestamp + MIN_PRODUCER_TIMEOUT` for skip blocks, but there is no visible upper bound check against the wall clock. A malicious block-producing validator can set block timestamps arbitrarily far in the future. This directly affects reward calculations via `Policy::supply_at()` and `batch_delay()` in `blockchain/src/reward.rs`, inflating the monetary supply beyond the intended emission schedule. ### Patches TBD ### Workarounds No know workarounds.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-49xc-52mp-cc9j in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-49xc-52mp-cc9j across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.

GHSA-49xc-52mp-cc9j: nimiq-blockchain… | O3 Security