GHSA-49g7-2ww7-3vf5 is a high-severity (CVSS 7) SQL Injection vulnerability in glances. A fix is available for glances — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Glances has a SQL Injection in DuckDB Export via Unparameterized DDL Statements
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-49g7-2ww7-3vf5.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-49g7-2ww7-3vf5 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
glancesReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The GHSA-x46r fix (commit 39161f0) addressed SQL injection in the TimescaleDB export module by converting all SQL operations to use parameterized queries and psycopg.sql composable objects. However, the DuckDB export module (glances/exports/glances_duckdb/__init__.py) was not included in this fix and contains the same class of vulnerability: table names and column names derived from monitoring statistics are directly interpolated into SQL statements via f-strings. While DuckDB INSERT values already use parameterized queries (? placeholders), the DDL construction and table name references do not escape or parameterize identifier names.
Details
The DuckDB export module constructs SQL DDL statements by directly interpolating stat field names and plugin names into f-strings.
Vulnerable CREATE TABLE construction (glances/exports/glances_duckdb/__init__.py:156-162):
create_query = f"""
CREATE TABLE {plugin} (
{', '.join(creation_list)}
);"""
self.client.execute(create_query)
The creation_list is built from stat dictionary keys in the update() method (glances/exports/glances_duckdb/__init__.py:117-118):
for key, value in plugin_stats.items():
creation_list.append(f"{key} {convert_types[type(self.normalize(value)).__name__]}")
The INSERT statement also uses the unescaped plugin name (glances/exports/glances_duckdb/__init__.py:172-174):
insert_query = f"""
INSERT INTO {plugin} VALUES (
{', '.join(['?' for _ in values])}
);"""
While INSERT values use ? placeholders (safe), the table name {plugin} is directly interpolated in both CREATE TABLE and INSERT INTO statements. Column names in creation_list are also directly interpolated without quoting.
Comparison with the TimescaleDB fix (commit 39161f0):
The TimescaleDB fix addressed this exact pattern by:
- Using
psycopg.sql.Identifier()for table and column names - Using
psycopg.sql.SQL()for composing queries - Using
%splaceholders for all values
The DuckDB module was not part of this fix despite having the same vulnerability class.
Attack vector:
The primary attack vector is through stat dictionary keys. While most keys come from hardcoded psutil field names (e.g., cpu_percent, memory_usage), any future plugin that introduces dynamic keys from external data (container labels, custom metrics, user-defined sensor names) would create an exploitable injection path. Additionally, the table name (plugin) comes from the internal plugins list, but any custom plugin with a crafted name could inject SQL.
PoC
The injection is demonstrable when column or table names contain SQL metacharacters:
# Simulated injection via a hypothetical plugin with dynamic keys
# If a stat dict contained a key like:
# "cpu_percent BIGINT); DROP TABLE cpu; --"
# The creation_list would produce:
# "cpu_percent BIGINT); DROP TABLE cpu; -- VARCHAR"
# Which in the CREATE TABLE f-string becomes:
# CREATE TABLE plugin_name (
# time TIMETZ,
# hostname_id VARCHAR,
# cpu_percent BIGINT); DROP TABLE cpu; -- VARCHAR
# );
# Verify with DuckDB export enabled:
# 1. Configure DuckDB export in glances.conf:
# [duckdb]
# database=/tmp/glances.duckdb
# 2. Start Glances with DuckDB export and debug logging
glances --export duckdb --debug 2>&1 | grep "Create table"
# 3. Observe the unescaped SQL in debug output
Impact
-
Defense-in-depth gap: The identical vulnerability pattern was identified and fixed in TimescaleDB (GHSA-x46r) but the fix was not applied to the sibling DuckDB module. This represents an incomplete patch that leaves the same attack surface open through a different code path.
-
Future exploitability: If any Glances plugin is added or modified to produce stat dictionary keys from external/user-controlled data (e.g., container metadata, custom metric names, SNMP OID labels), the DuckDB export would become immediately exploitable for SQL injection without any additional code changes.
-
Data integrity: A successful injection in the CREATE TABLE statement could corrupt the DuckDB database, create unauthorized tables, or modify schema in ways that affect other applications reading from the same database file.
Recommended Fix
Apply the same parameterization approach used in the TimescaleDB fix. DuckDB supports identifier quoting with double quotes:
# glances/exports/glances_duckdb/__init__.py
def _quote_identifier(name):
"""Quote a SQL identifier to prevent injection."""
# DuckDB uses double-quote escaping for identifiers
return '"' + name.replace('"', '""') + '"'
def export(self, plugin, creation_list, values_list):
"""Export the stats to the DuckDB server."""
logger.debug(f"Export {plugin} stats to DuckDB")
table_list = [t[0] for t in self.client.sql("SHOW TABLES").fetchall()]
if plugin not in table_list:
# Quote table and column names to prevent injection
quoted_plugin = _quote_identifier(plugin)
quoted_fields = []
for item in creation_list:
parts = item.split(' ', 1)
col_name = _quote_identifier(parts[0])
col_type = parts[1] if len(parts) > 1 else 'VARCHAR'
quoted_fields.append(f"{col_name} {col_type}")
create_query = f"CREATE TABLE {quoted_plugin} ({', '.join(quoted_fields)});"
try:
self.client.execute(create_query)
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Cannot create table {plugin}: {e}")
return
self.client.commit()
# Insert with quoted table name
quoted_plugin = _quote_identifier(plugin)
for values in values_list:
insert_query = f"INSERT INTO {quoted_plugin} VALUES ({', '.join(['?' for _ in values])});"
try:
self.client.execute(insert_query, values)
except Exception as e:
logger.error(f"Cannot insert data into table {plugin}: {e}")
self.client.commit()
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | glances | all versions | 4.5.2pip install --upgrade 'glances==4.5.2' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for glances, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update glances to 4.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-49g7-2ww7-3vf5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-49g7-2ww7-3vf5 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-49g7-2ww7-3vf5. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-49g7-2ww7-3vf5 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-49g7-2ww7-3vf5 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.