Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-46q5-g3j9-wx5c zeptoclaw

HIGHFix: qhkm/zeptoclaw#324

GHSA-46q5-g3j9-wx5c is a high-severity (CVSS 8.2) Missing Authentication vulnerability in zeptoclaw. A fix is available for zeptoclaw — see the affected versions and patch details below.

ZeptoClaw: Generic webhook channel trusts caller-supplied identity fields; allowlist is checked against untrusted payload data

Also known asCVE-2026-32231
Published
Mar 12, 2026
Updated
Mar 13, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 20, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-46q5-g3j9-wx5c.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs8th percentile — riskier than 8% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-46q5-g3j9-wx5c plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,333 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🦀zeptoclaw

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The generic webhook channel trusts caller-supplied identity fields (sender, chat_id) from the request body and applies authorization checks to those untrusted values. Because authentication is optional and defaults to disabled (auth_token: None), an attacker who can reach POST /webhook can spoof an allowlisted sender and choose arbitrary chat_id values, enabling high-risk message spoofing and potential IDOR-style session/chat routing abuse.

Details

Relevant code paths:

  • src/channels/webhook.rs:121 sets runtime default auth_token: None.
  • src/config/types.rs:910 also defaults webhook config auth_token to None.
  • src/channels/webhook.rs:224 (validate_auth) explicitly allows requests when no token is configured.
  • src/channels/webhook.rs:128 defines WebhookPayload with identity fields fully controlled by caller input:
    • sender: String
    • chat_id: String
  • src/channels/webhook.rs:421 performs allowlist authorization using payload.sender.
  • src/channels/webhook.rs:433 and src/channels/webhook.rs:434 create InboundMessage using untrusted payload.sender and payload.chat_id.

Why this is vulnerable:

  • The system treats user-provided JSON identity as authoritative identity.
  • Allowlist enforcement does not verify sender authenticity beyond that payload value.
  • chat_id is also attacker-controlled, so routing/session association can be steered to arbitrary chats/conversations.
  • If the webhook is exposed without strong upstream authn/authz controls, spoofing is straightforward.

PoC

  1. Configure the webhook channel in a vulnerable posture (common default behavior):
    • enabled = true
    • bind_address = "0.0.0.0" (or any reachable interface)
    • port = 9876
    • path = "/webhook"
    • auth_token = null (or omitted)
    • allow_from = ["trusted-user-1"]
    • deny_by_default = true
  2. Start ZeptoClaw.
  3. Send a forged request with attacker-chosen sender and chat_id, without any Authorization header:
curl -i -X POST "http://127.0.0.1:9876/webhook" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  --data '{
    "message":"FORGED: run privileged workflow",
    "sender":"trusted-user-1",
    "chat_id":"victim-chat-42"
  }'
  1. Observe:
    • Response is HTTP/1.1 200 OK.
    • Message is accepted as if it originated from trusted-user-1.
    • Message is routed under attacker-chosen chat_id (victim-chat-42).

Impact

  • Vulnerability type:
    • Authentication/authorization bypass (identity spoofing)
    • IDOR-style routing/control issue via attacker-chosen chat_id
  • Affected deployments:
    • Any deployment exposing the generic webhook endpoint without strict upstream authentication and identity binding.
  • Security consequences:
    • Forged inbound messages from spoofed trusted users.
    • Bypass of allowlist intent by injecting allowlisted sender IDs in payload.
    • Cross-chat/session contamination or hijacking by choosing arbitrary chat_id.
    • Potential unauthorized downstream agent/tool actions triggered by malicious input.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iozeptoclawall versions0.7.6cargo update -p zeptoclaw --precise 0.7.6

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for zeptoclaw, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update zeptoclaw to 0.7.6 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-46q5-g3j9-wx5c is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-46q5-g3j9-wx5c can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-46q5-g3j9-wx5c. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The generic webhook channel trusts caller-supplied identity fields (`sender`, `chat_id`) from the request body and applies authorization checks to those untrusted values. Because authentication is optional and defaults to disabled (`auth_token: None`), an attacker who can reach `POST /webhook` can spoof an allowlisted sender and choose arbitrary `chat_id` values, enabling high-risk message spoofing and potential IDOR-style session/chat routing abuse. ### Details Relevant code paths: - `src/channels/webhook.rs:121` sets runtime default `auth_token: None`. - `src/config/types.rs:91
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-46q5-g3j9-wx5c in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-46q5-g3j9-wx5c across crates.io dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-46q5-g3j9-wx5c: zeptoclaw (High 8.2) | O3 Security