GHSA-45w3-v3g4-54pm
Chrono has potential segfault issue in SPIFFE authenticator
Blast Radius
parsec-serviceReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Impact
Several vulnerabilities have been reported in the time and chrono crates related to handling of calls to localtime_r. You can follow some of the discussions here and here, and the associated CVE here. In our case, the issue with the dependency was flagged by our nightly CI build running cargo-audit.
The vulnerability leads to a segfault in specific circumstances - namely, when one of a number of functions in the time crate is called while any other thread is setting an environment variable. Given that in the case of the Parsec service this affects the SPIFFE authenticator, Parsec service users can encounter the issue only when the JWT SVID authenticator is enabled and being used. We have not undergone any manual tracing to understand if the vulnerable methods are called anywhere in our stack, however it seems reasonable to expect that if that were to be the case, the issue would lie in JWT validation (i.e. when handling the dates found within a Json Web Token). JWT validation could thus fail, bringing down the thread in which the request happens. The rest of the threads continue to work. Since the threadpool implementation that we use continues replenishing the pool when one thread panics, the impact on the service should be minimal.
Patches
No current patches exist as the problems lie in a number of dependencies that are not under our control (see more details here).
The issue tracking the required change in the rust-spiffe crate (through which the vulnerable dependencies are imported in Parsec) can be seen here. Once updates happen in our dependency chain that allow us to update beyond the vulnerable versions of time and chrono, a new version of the Parsec service will be tagged and released with the appropriate notifications.
Workarounds
The only complete workaround is to use a different type of authenticator with the Parsec service.
References
As quoted in the initial paragraph, you can find out more information:
- in the
chronorepo issue here - in the
timerepo issue here - in the official CVE report here
- in our tracking issue here
For more information:
If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:
- Open an issue in the Parsec service repo
- Email us at [email protected]
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | parsec-service | ≥ 0.8.0&&< 1.1.0 | 1.1.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for parsec-service. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update parsec-service to 1.1.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-45w3-v3g4-54pm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-45w3-v3g4-54pm is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-45w3-v3g4-54pm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-45w3-v3g4-54pm in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-45w3-v3g4-54pm across crates.io dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.