Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-3jqf-v4mv-747g

Moonraker affected by LDAP search filter injection

Also known asCVE-2026-24130
Published
Jan 22, 2026
Updated
Feb 3, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk18th percentile+0.25%
0.00%0.26%0.51%0.77%0.1%0.3%Feb 26May 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍moonraker

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Instances of Moonraker configured with the ldap component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes.

Patches

Users should upgrade to Moonraker 0.10.0 which patches this vulnerability.

Workarounds

Admins can set the max_login_attempts option in the [authorization] section to a reasonable value. Any IP attempting to exploit this vulnerability will be locked out after it has reached the specified number of consecutive failed login attempts. This condition is cleared after a Moonraker restart. Note that if an attacker knows a valid user password they can bypass this protection by successfully logging in.

The most secure workaround for users unable to upgrade is to remove the ldap section from moonraker.conf and rely on the built in user authentication.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPImoonrakerall versions0.10.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for moonraker. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update moonraker to 0.10.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-3jqf-v4mv-747g is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-3jqf-v4mv-747g is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-3jqf-v4mv-747g. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Instances of Moonraker configured with the `ldap` component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. ### Patches Users should upgrade to Moonraker 0.10.0 which patches this vulnerability. ### Workarounds Admins can set the `max_login_attempts` option in the `[authorization]` section to a reasonable value. Any IP attempting
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-3jqf-v4mv-747g in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-3jqf-v4mv-747g across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.