Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦 npm

GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh

MEDIUM

Fastify: Incorrect Content-Type parsing can lead to CSRF attack

Also known asCVE-2022-41919
Published
Nov 21, 2022
Updated
Nov 8, 2023
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk29th percentile+0.22%
0.00%0.29%0.58%0.87%0.1%0.4%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

2 pkgs affected

Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.

fastifynpm
8.5Mdownloads / week

Description

Impact

The attacker can use the incorrect Content-Type to bypass the Pre-Flight checking of fetch. fetch() requests with Content-Type’s essence as "application/x-www-form-urlencoded", "multipart/form-data", or "text/plain", could potentially be used to invoke routes that only accepts application/json content type, thus bypassing any CORS protection, and therefore they could lead to a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack.

Patches

For 4.x users, please update to at least 4.10.2 For 3.x users, please update to at least 3.29.4

Workarounds

Implement Cross-Site Request Forgery protection using @fastify/csrf.

References

Check out the HackerOne report: https://hackerone.com/reports/1763832.

For more information

Fastify security policy

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmfastify4.0.0&&< 4.10.24.10.2
📦npmfastify3.0.0&&< 3.29.43.29.4

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fastify. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update fastify to 4.10.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The attacker can use the incorrect `Content-Type` to bypass the `Pre-Flight` checking of `fetch`. `fetch()` requests with Content-Type’s [essence](https://mimesniff.spec.whatwg.org/#mime-type-essence) as "application/x-www-form-urlencoded", "multipart/form-data", or "text/plain", could potentially be used to invoke routes that only accepts `application/json` content type, thus bypassing any [CORS protection](https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#simple-header), and therefore they could lead to a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack. ### Patches For `4.x` users, please update to at least `4
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.