NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

Fastify: Incorrect Content-Type parsing can lead to CSRF attackGHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh

MEDIUMFix: fastify/fastify@62dde76

GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.2) Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in fastify. A fix is available for fastify — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2022-41919
Published
Updated
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 12, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk+0.04%
Lower risk than most CVEs36th percentile — riskier than 36% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.30%0.61%0.91%0.1%0.4%0.4%0.4%Jun 26Aug 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

Where this sits among everything scored

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

6Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
fastifynpm
22.2Mdownloads / week

Description

Impact

The attacker can use the incorrect Content-Type to bypass the Pre-Flight checking of fetch. fetch() requests with Content-Type’s essence as "application/x-www-form-urlencoded", "multipart/form-data", or "text/plain", could potentially be used to invoke routes that only accepts application/json content type, thus bypassing any CORS protection, and therefore they could lead to a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack.

Patches

For 4.x users, please update to at least 4.10.2 For 3.x users, please update to at least 3.29.4

Workarounds

Implement Cross-Site Request Forgery protection using @fastify/csrf.

References

Check out the HackerOne report: https://hackerone.com/reports/1763832.

For more information

Fastify security policy

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmfastify≥ 4.0.0&&< 4.10.24.10.2npm install fastify@4.10.2
📦npmfastify≥ 3.0.0&&< 3.29.43.29.4npm install fastify@3.29.4

Affected Products

1 product · 2 configurations
Application
fastifyfastify
≥ 4.0.0 && < 4.10.2
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for fastify, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update fastify to 4.10.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
Workaround published by Red Hat
Implement Cross-site request forgery protection using `@fastify/csrf'.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact The attacker can use the incorrect `Content-Type` to bypass the `Pre-Flight` checking of `fetch`. `fetch()` requests with Content-Type’s [essence](https://mimesniff.spec.whatwg.org/#mime-type-essence) as "application/x-www-form-urlencoded", "multipart/form-data", or "text/plain", could potentially be used to invoke routes that only accepts `application/json` content type, thus bypassing any [CORS protection](https://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#simple-header), and therefore they could lead to a Cross-Site Request Forgery attack. ### Patches For `4.x` users, please update to at least `4
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-3fjj-p79j-c9hh in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

Fastify: Incorrect Content-Type parsing can lead to CSRF…