Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-389r-rccm-h3h5

MEDIUM

eml_parser: Path Traversal in Official Example Script Leads to Arbitrary File Write

Also known asCVE-2026-29780
Published
Mar 5, 2026
Updated
Mar 9, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk14th percentile+0.23%
0.00%0.25%0.49%0.74%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.2%Apr 26Jun 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍eml-parser

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

The official example script examples/recursively_extract_attachments.py contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows arbitrary file write outside the intended output directory. Attachment filenames extracted from parsed emails are directly used to construct output file paths without any sanitization, allowing an attacker-controlled filename to escape the target directory.

Details

File: examples/recursively_extract_attachments.py Lines: 61–64

for a in m['attachment']:
    out_filepath = out_path / a['filename']  # No sanitization
    print(f'\tWriting attachment: {out_filepath}')
    with out_filepath.open('wb') as a_out:
        a_out.write(base64.b64decode(a['raw']))

The value a['filename'] is attacker-controlled via crafted email attachment headers:

Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="../outside/pwned.txt"

No path normalization or boundary validation is performed before writing.

PoC

  1. Create a malicious .eml file:
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="../outside/pwned.txt"
  1. Run the example script:
python recursively_extract_attachments.py -p ./emails -o ./safe
  1. Expected: ./safe/pwned.txt
  2. Actual: ./outside/pwned.txt ← written outside the intended directory

Verified on Kali Linux with eml_parser installed via pip in a virtual environment.

Impact

This vulnerability is limited to the example script only and does not affect the core eml_parser library. However, as the script is part of the official repository and is likely to be adapted for production use, an attacker supplying a crafted email could achieve arbitrary file write within the execution context.

Potential attack scenarios include:

  • Cron job injection: filename="../../etc/cron.d/backdoor"
  • Web shell upload: filename="../../var/www/html/shell.php"
  • SSH key injection: filename="../../home/user/.ssh/authorized_keys"

Recommended Fix

import os.path

for a in m['attachment']:
    filename = os.path.basename(a['filename'])
    out_filepath = out_path / filename

    if not out_filepath.resolve().is_relative_to(out_path.resolve()):
        print(f'[!] Skipping suspicious filename: {a["filename"]}')
        continue

    print(f'\tWriting attachment: {out_filepath}')
    with out_filepath.open('wb') as a_out:
        a_out.write(base64.b64decode(a['raw']))

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIeml-parserall versions2.0.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for eml-parser. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update eml-parser to 2.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-389r-rccm-h3h5 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-389r-rccm-h3h5 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-389r-rccm-h3h5. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The official example script `examples/recursively_extract_attachments.py` contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows arbitrary file write outside the intended output directory. Attachment filenames extracted from parsed emails are directly used to construct output file paths without any sanitization, allowing an attacker-controlled filename to escape the target directory. ### Details File: `examples/recursively_extract_attachments.py` Lines: 61–64 ```python for a in m['attachment']: out_filepath = out_path / a['filename'] # No sanitization print(f'\tWriting attac
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-389r-rccm-h3h5 in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-389r-rccm-h3h5 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.