GHSA-353c-v8x9-v7c3 — mcp-framework
Fix: QuantGeekDev/mcp-framework@f97d2bbGHSA-353c-v8x9-v7c3 is a CWE-770 vulnerability in mcp-framework. A fix is available for mcp-framework — see the affected versions and patch details below.
MCP-Framework: Unbounded memory allocation in readRequestBody allows denial of service via HTTP transport
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-353c-v8x9-v7c3.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
mcp-frameworknpmDescription
Summary
The readRequestBody() function in src/transports/http/server.ts concatenates HTTP request body chunks into a string with no size limit, allowing a remote unauthenticated attacker to crash the server via memory exhaustion with a single large HTTP POST request.
Details
File: src/transports/http/server.ts, lines 224-240
private async readRequestBody(req: IncomingMessage): Promise<any> {
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let body = '';
req.on('data', (chunk) => {
body += chunk.toString(); // No size limit
});
req.on('end', () => {
try {
const parsed = body ? JSON.parse(body) : null;
resolve(parsed);
} catch (error) {
reject(error);
}
});
req.on('error', reject);
});
}
A maxMessageSize configuration value exists in DEFAULT_HTTP_STREAM_CONFIG (4MB, defined in src/transports/http/types.ts line 124) but is never enforced in readRequestBody(). This creates a false sense of security.
PoC
Local testing with 50MB POST payloads against the vulnerable readRequestBody() function:
| Trial | Payload | RSS growth | Time | Result |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 50MB | +197MB | 42ms | Vulnerable |
| 2 | 50MB | +183MB | 46ms | Vulnerable |
| 3 | 50MB | +15MB | 43ms | Vulnerable |
| 4 | 50MB | +14MB | 32ms | Vulnerable |
| 5 | 50MB | +65MB | 38ms | Vulnerable |
Reproducibility: 5/5 (100%)
Impact
- Denial of Service: Any mcp-framework HTTP server can be crashed by a single large POST request to /mcp
- No authentication required: readRequestBody() executes before any auth checks (auth is opt-in, default is no auth)
- Dead config: maxMessageSize exists but is never enforced, giving a false sense of security
- Affected: All applications using mcp-framework HttpStreamTransport (60,000 weekly npm downloads)
CWE-770: Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling Suggested CVSS 3.1: 7.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H)
Suggested Fix
Enforce maxMessageSize in readRequestBody():
private async readRequestBody(req: IncomingMessage): Promise<any> {
const maxSize = this._config.maxMessageSize || 4 * 1024 * 1024;
return new Promise((resolve, reject) => {
let body = '';
let size = 0;
req.on('data', (chunk) => {
size += chunk.length;
if (size > maxSize) {
req.destroy();
reject(new Error('Request body too large'));
return;
}
body += chunk.toString();
});
// ...
});
}
Disclosure Timeline
This report follows coordinated disclosure. I request a 90-day window before public disclosure.
Reporter: Raza Sharif, CyberSecAI Ltd ([email protected])
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | mcp-framework | all versions | 0.2.22npm install mcp-framework@0.2.22 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mcp-framework, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update mcp-framework to 0.2.22 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-353c-v8x9-v7c3 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-353c-v8x9-v7c3 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-353c-v8x9-v7c3. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-353c-v8x9-v7c3 in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-353c-v8x9-v7c3 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.