Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-33p9-3p43-82vq

HIGH

Jupyter Core on Windows Has Uncontrolled Search Path Element Local Privilege Escalation Vulnerability

Also known asCVE-2025-30167
Published
Jun 4, 2025
Updated
Feb 4, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.2%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk5th percentile+0.09%
0.00%0.22%0.44%0.65%0.0%0.2%Dec 25Apr 26Jun 26

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍jupyter-core

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

On Windows, the shared %PROGRAMDATA% directory is searched for configuration files (SYSTEM_CONFIG_PATH and SYSTEM_JUPYTER_PATH), which may allow users to create configuration files affecting other users.

Only shared Windows systems with multiple users and unprotected %PROGRAMDATA% are affected.

Mitigations

  • upgrade to jupyter_core>=5.8.1 (5.8.0 is patched but breaks jupyter-server) , or
  • as administrator, modify the permissions on the %PROGRAMDATA% directory so it is not writable by unauthorized users, or
  • as administrator, create the %PROGRAMDATA%\jupyter directory with appropriately restrictive permissions, or
  • as user or administrator, set the %PROGRAMDATA% environment variable to a directory with appropriately restrictive permissions (e.g. controlled by administrators or the current user)

Credit

Reported via Trend Micro Zero Day Initiative as ZDI-CAN-25932

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIjupyter-coreall versions5.8.1

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for jupyter-core. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update jupyter-core to 5.8.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-33p9-3p43-82vq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-33p9-3p43-82vq is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-33p9-3p43-82vq. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Impact On Windows, the shared `%PROGRAMDATA%` directory is searched for configuration files (`SYSTEM_CONFIG_PATH` and `SYSTEM_JUPYTER_PATH`), which may allow users to create configuration files affecting other users. Only shared Windows systems with multiple users and unprotected `%PROGRAMDATA%` are affected. ## Mitigations - upgrade to `jupyter_core>=5.8.1` (5.8.0 is patched but breaks `jupyter-server`) , or - as administrator, modify the permissions on the `%PROGRAMDATA%` directory so it is not writable by unauthorized users, or - as administrator, create the `%PROGRAMDATA%\jupyter` d
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-33p9-3p43-82vq in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-33p9-3p43-82vq across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.