NIST deprecates RSA-2048 from 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🦀 crates.io
Not in CISA KEV

RustFS's RPC signature verification logs shared secretGHSA-333v-68xh-8mmq

Fix: rustfs/rustfs@6b2eebe

GHSA-333v-68xh-8mmq is a CWE-532 vulnerability in rustfs. A fix is available for rustfs — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-22782
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Nov 10, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-333v-68xh-8mmq.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.5%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs45th percentile — riskier than 45% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.34%0.69%1.03%0.0%0.5%May 26Sep 26Nov 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🦀rustfs

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

Invalid RPC signatures cause the server to log the shared HMAC secret (and expected signature), which exposes the secret to log readers and enables forged RPC calls.

Details

In crates/ecstore/src/rpc/http_auth.rs:115-122 , the invalid signature branch logs sensitive data:

if signature != expected_signature {
    error!(
        "verify_rpc_signature: Invalid signature: secret {}, url {}, method {}, timestamp {}, signature {}, expected_signature {}",
        secret, url, method, timestamp, signature, expected_signature
    );

    return Err(std::io::Error::other("Invalid signature"));
}

This log line includes secret and expected_signature, both derived from the shared HMAC key. Any invalidly signed request triggers this path. The function is reachable from RPC and admin request handlers.

PoC

  1. Run RustFS with error logging enabled.
  2. Send a request with an invalid signature:
     ts=$(date +%s)
     curl -v \
       -H "x-rustfs-timestamp: $ts" \
       -H "x-rustfs-signature: invalid-signature" \
       "http://localhost:9000/rustfs/rpc/read_file_stream?disk=foo&volume=bar&path=baz&offset=0&length=1"
    
  3. Observed output:
     HTTP 403 AccessDenied: Invalid signature
     verify_rpc_signature: Invalid signature: secret rustfsadmin, url /rustfs/rpc/read_file_stream?disk=foo&volume=bar&path=baz&offset=0&length=1, method GET, timestamp 1767852115, signature invalid-signature, expected_signature oisNxNRTb80GXf97s/PGdScJzu8QB9Oxs+uOwf8RiK8=
    

Impact

  • Exposes the shared RPC HMAC secret to log readers.
  • Enables attackers with log access to forge valid RPC signatures and make unauthorized RPC calls.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🦀crates.iorustfs≥ 1.0.0-alpha.1&&< 1.0.0-alpha.801.0.0-alpha.80cargo update -p rustfs --precise 1.0.0-alpha.80

Affected Products

1 product · 79 configurations
Application
rustfsrustfs
1 version
1.0.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rustfs, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update rustfs to 1.0.0-alpha.80 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-333v-68xh-8mmq is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Invalid RPC signatures cause the server to log the shared HMAC secret (and expected signature), which exposes the secret to log readers and enables forged RPC calls. ### Details In [`crates/ecstore/src/rpc/http_auth.rs:115-122`](https://github.com/rustfs/rustfs/blob/9e162b6e9ebb874cc1d06a7b33bc4a05786578aa/crates/ecstore/src/rpc/http_auth.rs#L115-L122) , the invalid signature branch logs sensitive data: ```rs if signature != expected_signature { error!( "verify_rpc_signature: Invalid signature: secret {}, url {}, method {}, timestamp {}, signature {}, expected_signatur
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-333v-68xh-8mmq in your dependencies?

Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.

RustFS's RPC signature verification logs shared secret