Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
CRITICAL severity

GHSA-2xp3-57p7-qf4v — xml-crypto

CRITICALFix: node-saml/xml-crypto#301

GHSA-2xp3-57p7-qf4v is a critical-severity (CVSS 10) CWE-347 vulnerability in xml-crypto. A fix is available for xml-crypto — see the affected versions and patch details below.

xml-crypto vulnerable to XML signature verification bypass due improper verification of signature/signature spoofing

Also known asCVE-2024-32962
Published
May 1, 2024
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 26, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-2xp3-57p7-qf4v.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.8%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs56th percentile — riskier than 56% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-2xp3-57p7-qf4v by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 379,842 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

524other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
xml-cryptonpm
5.3Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

Default configuration does not check authorization of the signer, it only checks the validity of the signature per section 3.2.2 of https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/#sec-CoreValidation. As such, without additional validation steps, the default configuration allows a malicious actor to re-sign an XML document, place the certificate in a <KeyInfo /> element, and pass xml-crypto default validation checks.

Details

Affected xml-crypto versions between versions >= 4.0.0 and < 6.0.0.

xml-crypto trusts by default any certificate provided via digitally signed XML document's <KeyInfo />.

xml-crypto prefers to use any certificate provided via digitally signed XML document's <KeyInfo /> even if library was configured to use specific certificate (publicCert) for signature verification purposes.

Attacker can spoof signature verification by modifying XML document and replacing existing signature with signature generated with malicious private key (created by attacker) and by attaching that private key's certificate to <KeyInfo /> element.

Vulnerability is combination of changes introduced to 4.0.0 at

Changes at PR provided default method to extract certificate from signed XML document.

and changes at PR prefer output of that method to be used as certificate for signature verification even in the case when library is configured to use specific/pre-configured signingCert

Name of the signingCert was changed later (but prior to 4.0.0 release) to publicCert:

Issue was fixed to 6.0.0 by disabling implicit usage of default getCertFromKeyInfo implementation:

Possible workarounds for versions 4.x and 5.x:

  • Check the certificate extracted via getCertFromKeyInfo against trusted certificates before accepting the results of the validation.
  • Set xml-crypto's getCertFromKeyInfo to () => undefined forcing xml-crypto to use an explicitly configured publicCert or privateKey for signature verification.

PoC

https://github.com/node-saml/xml-crypto/discussions/399

Impact

An untrusted certificate can be used to pass a malicious XML payload through an improperly configured installation of xml-crypto.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmxml-crypto≥ 4.0.0&&< 6.0.06.0.0npm install xml-crypto@6.0.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for xml-crypto, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update xml-crypto to 6.0.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2xp3-57p7-qf4v is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatCritical

Red Hat Developer Hub is not affected by this vulnerability because it does not use a vulnerable version of xml-crypto.

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-2xp3-57p7-qf4v (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary Default configuration does not check authorization of the signer, it only checks the validity of the signature per section 3.2.2 of https://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xmldsig-core-20080610/#sec-CoreValidation. As such, without additional validation steps, the default configuration allows a malicious actor to re-sign an XML document, place the certificate in a `<KeyInfo />` element, and pass `xml-crypto` default validation checks. ### Details Affected `xml-crypto` versions between versions `>= 4.0.0` and `< 6.0.0`. `xml-crypto` trusts by default any certificate provided via digital
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-2xp3-57p7-qf4v in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

GHSA-2xp3-57p7-qf4v: xml-crypto (Critical 10) | O3 Security