Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-2x8m-83vc-6wv4 flowise

HIGH

GHSA-2x8m-83vc-6wv4 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in flowise. A fix is available for flowise — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Flowise: SSRF Protection Bypass (TOCTOU & Default Insecure)

Also known asCVE-2026-41272
Published
Apr 16, 2026
Updated
May 5, 2026
Affected
2 pkgs
Patched
2 / 2
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 17, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
  • A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-2x8m-83vc-6wv4.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs18th percentile — riskier than 18% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-2x8m-83vc-6wv4 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

2 pkgs affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

0other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
flowisenpm
3Kdownloads / week
flowise-componentsnpm
3Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

The core security wrappers (secureAxiosRequest and secureFetch) intended to prevent Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) contain multiple logic flaws. These flaws allow attackers to bypass the allow/deny lists via DNS Rebinding (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use) or by exploiting the default configuration which fails to enforce any deny list.

Details

The flaws exist in packages/components/src/httpSecurity.ts.

Default Insecure: If process.env.HTTP_DENY_LIST is undefined, checkDenyList returns immediately, allowing all requests (including localhost).

DNS Rebinding (TOCTOU): The function performs a DNS lookup (dns.lookup) to validate the IP, and then the HTTP client performs a new lookup to connect. An attacker can serve a valid IP first, then switch to an internal IP (e.g., 127.0.0.1) for the second lookup.

PoC

Ensure HTTP_DENY_LIST is unset (default behavior).

Use any node utilizing secureFetch to access http://127.0.0.1.

Result: Request succeeds.

Scenario 2: DNS Rebinding

Attacker controls domain attacker.com and a custom DNS server.

Configure DNS to return 1.1.1.1 (Safe IP) with TTL=0 for the first query.

Configure DNS to return 127.0.0.1 (Blocked IP) for subsequent queries.

Flowise validates attacker.com -> 1.1.1.1 (Allowed).

Flowise fetches attacker.com -> 127.0.0.1 (Bypass).

Run the following for manual verification

// PoC for httpSecurity.ts Bypasses
import * as dns from 'dns/promises';

// Mocking the checkDenyList logic from Flowise
async function checkDenyList(url: string) {
    const deniedIPs = ['127.0.0.1', '0.0.0.0']; // Simplified deny list logic

    if (!process.env.HTTP_DENY_LIST) {
        console.log(\"⚠️  HTTP_DENY_LIST not set. Returning allowed.\");
        return; // Vulnerability 1: Default Insecure
    }

    const { hostname } = new URL(url);
    const { address } = await dns.lookup(hostname);

    if (deniedIPs.includes(address)) {
        throw new Error(`IP ${address} is denied`);
    }
    console.log(`✅ IP ${address} allowed check.`);
}

async function runPoC() {
    console.log(\"--- Test 1: Default Configuration (Unset HTTP_DENY_LIST) ---\");
    // Ensure env var is unset
    delete process.env.HTTP_DENY_LIST;
    try {
        await checkDenyList('http://127.0.0.1');
        console.log(\"[PASS] Default config allowed localhost access.\");
    } catch (e) {
        console.log(\"[FAIL] Blocked:\", e.message);
    }

    console.log(\"\
--- Test 2: 'private' Keyword Bypass (Logic Flaw) ---\");
    process.env.HTTP_DENY_LIST = 'private'; // User expects this to block localhost
    try {
        await checkDenyList('http://127.0.0.1');
        // In real Flowise code, 'private' is not expanded to IPs, so it only blocks the string \"private\"
        console.log(\"[PASS] 'private' keyword failed to block localhost (Mock simulation).\");
    } catch (e) {
        console.log(\"[FAIL] Blocked:\", e.message);
    }
}

runPoC();

Impact

Confidentiality: High (Access to internal services if protection is bypassed).

Integrity: Low/Medium (If internal services allow state changes via GET).

Availability: Low.

Affected Packages

2 total 2 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npmflowiseall versions3.1.0npm install flowise@3.1.0
📦npmflowise-componentsall versions3.1.0npm install flowise-components@3.1.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for flowise, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update flowise to 3.1.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2x8m-83vc-6wv4 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-2x8m-83vc-6wv4 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-2x8m-83vc-6wv4. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary The core security wrappers (secureAxiosRequest and secureFetch) intended to prevent Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) contain multiple logic flaws. These flaws allow attackers to bypass the allow/deny lists via DNS Rebinding (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use) or by exploiting the default configuration which fails to enforce any deny list. ### Details The flaws exist in `packages/components/src/httpSecurity.ts`. Default Insecure: If process.env.HTTP_DENY_LIST is undefined, checkDenyList returns immediately, allowing all requests (including localhost). DNS Rebinding (TOCTOU): The funct
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-2x8m-83vc-6wv4 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-2x8m-83vc-6wv4 across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-2x8m-83vc-6wv4: flowise (High 7.1) | O3 Security