Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6 — django

HIGHFix: django/django@628b33a

GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in django. EPSS puts its 30-day exploitation probability at 62.6% (99th percentile). A fix is available for django — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Resource exhaustion in Django

Also known asBIT-django-2023-24580CVE-2023-24580PYSEC-2023-13
Published
Feb 15, 2023
Updated
Mar 19, 2025
Affected
3 pkgs
Patched
3 / 3
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 25, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
62.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
High Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs99th percentile — riskier than 99% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6 plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE sits: patch-first territory.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 378,567 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the 50–90% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

3 pkgs affected
🐍django🐍django🐍django

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

An issue was discovered in the Multipart Request Parser in Django 3.2 before 3.2.18, 4.0 before 4.0.10, and 4.1 before 4.1.7. Passing certain inputs (e.g., an excessive number of parts) to multipart forms could result in too many open files or memory exhaustion, and provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack.

Affected Packages

3 total 3 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 3.2a1&&< 3.2.183.2.18pip install --upgrade 'django==3.2.18'
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 4.1a1&&< 4.1.74.1.7pip install --upgrade 'django==4.1.7'
🐍PyPIdjango≥ 4.0a1&&< 4.0.104.0.10pip install --upgrade 'django==4.0.10'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for django, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update django to 3.2.18 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6 can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate
ProductFixed inAdvisory
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.4 for RHEL 8automation-controller-0:4.4.2-1.el8apRHSA-2023:4692
Red Hat Satellite 6.13 for RHEL 8python-django-0:3.2.18-1.el8pcRHSA-2023:2097
RHUI 4 for RHEL 8python-django-0:3.2.18-1.0.1.el8uiRHSA-2023:2101

Frequently Asked Questions

An issue was discovered in the Multipart Request Parser in Django 3.2 before 3.2.18, 4.0 before 4.0.10, and 4.1 before 4.1.7. Passing certain inputs (e.g., an excessive number of parts) to multipart forms could result in too many open files or memory exhaustion, and provided a potential vector for a denial-of-service attack.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6 in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6 across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-2hrw-hx67-34x6: django (High 7.5) | O3 Security