GHSA-2c6v-8r3v-gh6p
Gogs has a Protected Branch Deletion Bypass in Web Interface
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
Blast Radius
gogs.io/gogsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
An access control bypass vulnerability in Gogs web interface allows any repository collaborator with Write permissions to delete protected branches (including the default branch) by sending a direct POST request, completely bypassing the branch protection mechanism. This vulnerability enables privilege escalation from Write to Admin level, allowing low-privilege users to perform dangerous operations that should be restricted to administrators only.
Although Git Hook layer correctly prevents protected branch deletion via SSH push, the web interface deletion operation does not trigger Git Hooks, resulting in complete bypass of protection mechanisms.
Details
Affected Component
- File:
internal/route/repo/branch.go - Function:
DeleteBranchPost(lines 110-155) - Route Configuration:
internal/cmd/web.go:589m.Post("/delete/*", reqSignIn, reqRepoWriter, repo.DeleteBranchPost)
Root Cause
The DeleteBranchPost function performs the following checks when deleting a branch:
- ✅ User authentication (
reqSignIn) - ✅ Write permission check (
reqRepoWriter) - ✅ Branch existence verification
- ✅ CommitID matching (optional parameter)
- ❌ Missing protected branch check
- ❌ Missing default branch check
While the UI layer (internal/route/repo/issue.go:646-658) correctly checks protected branch status and hides the delete button, attackers can directly construct POST requests to bypass UI restrictions.
Vulnerable Code
Vulnerable implementation (internal/route/repo/branch.go:110-155):
func DeleteBranchPost(c *context.Context) {
branchName := c.Params("*")
commitID := c.Query("commit")
defer func() {
redirectTo := c.Query("redirect_to")
if !tool.IsSameSiteURLPath(redirectTo) {
redirectTo = c.Repo.RepoLink
}
c.Redirect(redirectTo)
}()
if !c.Repo.GitRepo.HasBranch(branchName) {
return
}
if len(commitID) > 0 {
branchCommitID, err := c.Repo.GitRepo.BranchCommitID(branchName)
if err != nil {
log.Error("Failed to get commit ID of branch %q: %v", branchName, err)
return
}
if branchCommitID != commitID {
c.Flash.Error(c.Tr("repo.pulls.delete_branch_has_new_commits"))
return
}
}
// 🔴 Vulnerability: Missing protected branch check here
// Should add check like:
// protectBranch, err := database.GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName(c.Repo.Repository.ID, branchName)
// if protectBranch != nil && protectBranch.Protected { ... }
if err := c.Repo.GitRepo.DeleteBranch(branchName, git.DeleteBranchOptions{
Force: true,
}); err != nil {
log.Error("Failed to delete branch %q: %v", branchName, err)
return
}
if err := database.PrepareWebhooks(c.Repo.Repository, database.HookEventTypeDelete, &api.DeletePayload{
Ref: branchName,
RefType: "branch",
PusherType: api.PUSHER_TYPE_USER,
Repo: c.Repo.Repository.APIFormatLegacy(nil),
Sender: c.User.APIFormat(),
}); err != nil {
log.Error("Failed to prepare webhooks for %q: %v", database.HookEventTypeDelete, err)
return
}
}
Correct implementation in Git Hook (internal/cmd/hook.go:122-125):
// check and deletion
if newCommitID == git.EmptyID {
fail(fmt.Sprintf("Branch '%s' is protected from deletion", branchName), "")
}
Correct UI layer check (internal/route/repo/issue.go:646-658):
protectBranch, err := database.GetProtectBranchOfRepoByName(pull.BaseRepoID, pull.HeadBranch)
if err != nil {
if !database.IsErrBranchNotExist(err) {
c.Error(err, "get protect branch of repository by name")
return
}
} else {
branchProtected = protectBranch.Protected
}
c.Data["IsPullBranchDeletable"] = pull.BaseRepoID == pull.HeadRepoID &&
c.Repo.IsWriter() && c.Repo.GitRepo.HasBranch(pull.HeadBranch) &&
!branchProtected // UI layer has check, but backend doesn't
PoC
Prerequisites
- Have Write permissions to the target repository (collaborator or team member)
- Target repository has protected branches configured (e.g., main, master, develop)
- Access to Gogs web interface
Send Malicious POST Request
# Directly send DELETE request bypassing UI protection
curl -X POST \
-b cookies.txt \
-H "Content-Type: application/x-www-form-urlencoded" \
-d "_csrf=YOUR_CSRF_TOKEN" \
"https://gogs.example.com/username/repo/branches/delete/main"
<img width="1218" height="518" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/745da7c3-6139-408c-9747-ccbe9ea8548f" />
Impact
- Bypass branch protection mechanism: The core function of protected branches is to prevent deletion, and this vulnerability completely undermines this mechanism
- Delete default branch: Can cause repository to become inaccessible (git clone/pull failures)
- Bypass code review: After deleting protected branch, can push new branch bypassing Pull Request requirements
- Privilege escalation: Writer permission users can perform operations that should only be allowed for Admins
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | gogs.io/gogs | all versions | 0.14.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gogs.io/gogs. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update gogs.io/gogs to 0.14.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2c6v-8r3v-gh6p is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-2c6v-8r3v-gh6p is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-2c6v-8r3v-gh6p. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-2c6v-8r3v-gh6p in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-2c6v-8r3v-gh6p across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.