Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

GHSA-29pr-6jr8-q5jm sentry-sdk

HIGHFix: getsentry/sentry-python#1842

GHSA-29pr-6jr8-q5jm is a high-severity (CVSS 7.6) CWE-201 vulnerability in sentry-sdk. A fix is available for sentry-sdk — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Sentry SDK leaks sensitive session information when `sendDefaultPII` is set to `True`

Also known asCVE-2023-28117PYSEC-2026-920
Published
Mar 21, 2023
Updated
Sep 10, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Sep 18, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-29pr-6jr8-q5jm.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs50th percentile — riskier than 50% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-29pr-6jr8-q5jm plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍sentry-sdk

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

When using the Django integration of the Sentry SDK in a specific configuration it is possible to leak sensitive cookies values, including the session cookie to Sentry. These sensitive cookies could then be used by someone with access to your Sentry issues to impersonate or escalate their privileges within your application.

The below must be true in order for these sensitive values to be leaked:

  1. Your Sentry SDK configuration has sendDefaultPII set to True
  2. You are using a custom name for either of the cookies below in your Django settings.
  1. You are not configured in your organization or project settings to use our data scrubbing features to account for the custom cookie names

Patches

As of version 1.14.0, the Django integration of the sentry-sdk will detect the custom cookie names based on your Django settings and will remove the values from the payload before sending the data to Sentry.

Workarounds

If you can not update your sentry-sdk to a patched version than you can use the SDKs filtering mechanism to remove the cookies from the payload that is sent to Sentry. For error events this can be done with the before_send callback method and for performance related events (transactions) you can use the before_send_transaction callback method.

If you'd like to handle filtering of these values on the server-side, you can also use our advanced data scrubbing feature to account for the custom cookie names. Look for the $http.cookies, $http.headers, $request.cookies, or $request.headers fields to target with your scrubbing rule.

References

Credits

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIsentry-sdkall versions1.14.0pip install --upgrade 'sentry-sdk==1.14.0'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for sentry-sdk, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update sentry-sdk to 1.14.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-29pr-6jr8-q5jm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-29pr-6jr8-q5jm can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.

Tailored to GHSA-29pr-6jr8-q5jm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact When using the [Django integration](https://docs.sentry.io/platforms/python/guides/django/) of the Sentry SDK in a specific configuration it is possible to leak sensitive cookies values, including the session cookie to Sentry. These sensitive cookies could then be used by someone with access to your Sentry issues to impersonate or escalate their privileges within your application. The below must be true in order for these sensitive values to be leaked: 1. Your Sentry SDK configuration has `sendDefaultPII` set to `True` 2. You are using a custom name for either of the cookies below
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-29pr-6jr8-q5jm in your dependencies?

O3 Security finds GHSA-29pr-6jr8-q5jm across PyPI dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.

GHSA-29pr-6jr8-q5jm: sentry-sdk (High 7.6) | O3 Security