Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐹 Go

GHSA-28xx-pppm-vqff

ydb-go-sdk's transactions are not committed using the `options.WithCommit()` option on last call `table.Transaction.Execute` in transaction

Also known asGO-2026-4983
Published
Apr 30, 2026
Updated
Jun 8, 2026
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐹github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/v3

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Transactions were NOT committed despite the explicit options.WithCommit flag using table service client. Because of this, clients did not commit changes to the transaction, relying on the fact that the transaction commit was successful. This led (in rare cases) to a loss of data consistency.

Patches

ydb-go-sdk contains this problem in versions from v3.104.6 to v3.134.1. The fix for this problem has been released in version v3.134.2 (https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/pull/2091).

Workarounds

  1. Use explicit table.Transaction.CommitTx(ctx) instead use options.WithCommit().
  2. Use transaction retrier db.Table().DoTx(ctx, lambda) instead explicit start transaction on session.
  3. Use query client db.Query().Do(ctx, lambda) with the same logic in lambda

Resources

Commit with bug https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/commit/251128a64763555d9a79ee7a131dd154c9000eb9 Commit with fix https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/commit/25dcff4c41153f1f9413512ba12999b40bf7154d

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐹Gogithub.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/v33.104.6&&< 3.134.23.134.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/v3. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/v3 to 3.134.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-28xx-pppm-vqff is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-28xx-pppm-vqff is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-28xx-pppm-vqff. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Transactions were NOT committed despite the explicit `options.WithCommit` flag using table service client. Because of this, clients did not commit changes to the transaction, relying on the fact that the transaction commit was successful. This led (in rare cases) to a loss of data consistency. ### Patches `ydb-go-sdk` contains this problem in versions from [v3.104.6](https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/releases/tag/v3.104.6) to [v3.134.1](https://github.com/ydb-platform/ydb-go-sdk/releases/tag/v3.134.1). The fix for this problem has been released in version [v3.134.2](https:
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-28xx-pppm-vqff in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-28xx-pppm-vqff across Go dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.