Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI

GHSA-2828-9vh6-9m6j

MEDIUM

GHSA-2828-9vh6-9m6j is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in tuf. 1 public exploit reference exists, so weaponization risk is real. O3 Security confirms whether GHSA-2828-9vh6-9m6j is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.

Client Denial of Service on TUF

Also known asCVE-2020-6173PYSEC-2020-146
Published
Aug 21, 2020
Updated
Nov 18, 2024
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
1 known

Blast Radius

1 pkg affected
🐍tuf

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

An attacker who can gain file access to the repository and modify metadata files may cause a denial of service to clients by creating many invalid signatures on a metadata file. Having a large number of signatures to verify will delay the moment when the client will determine the signature is not valid. This delay may be for at least a few minutes, but possibly could be longer especially if multiple files are impacted.

The tuf maintainers would like to thank Erik MacLean of Analog Devices, Inc. for reporting this issue.

Patches

No fix exists for this issue.

Workarounds

No workarounds are known for this issue.

References

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPItuf0.7.2&&< 0.12.20.12.2
Exploits & PoCs
1

Research use only. For defensive security, authorized penetration testing, and academic research only. Never execute exploit code against systems without explicit written authorization.

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for tuf. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.

  2. Fix

    Update tuf to 0.12.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-2828-9vh6-9m6j is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

  4. How O3 protects you

    O3 pinpoints whether GHSA-2828-9vh6-9m6j is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.

Tailored to GHSA-2828-9vh6-9m6j. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact An attacker who can gain file access to the repository and modify metadata files may cause a denial of service to clients by creating many invalid signatures on a metadata file. Having a large number of signatures to verify will delay the moment when the client will determine the signature is not valid. This delay may be for at least a few minutes, but possibly could be longer especially if multiple files are impacted. The tuf maintainers would like to thank Erik MacLean of Analog Devices, Inc. for reporting this issue. ### Patches No fix exists for this issue. ### Workarounds N
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-2828-9vh6-9m6j in your dependencies?

O3 detects GHSA-2828-9vh6-9m6j across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.