Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

MCP TypeScript SDK: Experimental tasks were not tied to the session that created themGHSA-22jm-h49p-29qw

HIGHFix: modelcontextprotocol/typescript-sdk#2925

GHSA-22jm-h49p-29qw is a high-severity (CVSS 8.6) CWE-639 vulnerability in @modelcontextprotocol/sdk. A fix is available for @modelcontextprotocol/sdk — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Also known asCVE-2026-111767
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 23, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs27th percentile — riskier than 27% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

GHSA-22jm-h49p-29qw by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 395,249 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

78Kother npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
@modelcontextprotocol/sdknpm
42.1Mdownloads / week

Description

Summary

In affected versions, the experimental tasks feature (taskStore) did not check which session created a task. Clients sharing one InMemoryTaskStore could list, read and cancel each other's tasks.

Experimental tasks are deprecated. The 2026-07-28 specification replaced them with a redesigned extension. The best course of action is to stop using them.

Am I affected?

Only if your HTTP server passes taskStore to McpServer or Server. If grep -ri taskstore --exclude-dir=node_modules . finds nothing, you are not affected.

Affected versions: @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.24.0 through 1.31.0. The 2.x packages are not affected.

Fix

Upgrade to @modelcontextprotocol/sdk 1.32.0 or later. Each task is now tied to the session that created it, so a client that starts a new session can no longer reach its earlier tasks.

If you cannot upgrade yet, remove taskStore, or create one InMemoryTaskStore per session.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm@modelcontextprotocol/sdk≥ 1.24.0&&< 1.32.01.32.0npm install @modelcontextprotocol/sdk@1.32.0

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for @modelcontextprotocol/sdk, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update @modelcontextprotocol/sdk to 1.32.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-22jm-h49p-29qw is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatImportant

Red Hat Product Security has rated this flaw as having an Important severity because missing session boundaries within the shared task storage mechanism allow concurrent connections to inspect, enumerate, or abort tasks belonging to other clients. This classification reflects the high risk of cross-session data…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for GHSA-22jm-h49p-29qw (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary In affected versions, the experimental tasks feature (`taskStore`) did not check which session created a task. Clients sharing one `InMemoryTaskStore` could list, read and cancel each other's tasks. Experimental tasks are deprecated. The 2026-07-28 specification replaced them with a redesigned extension. The best course of action is to stop using them. ### Am I affected? Only if your HTTP server passes `taskStore` to `McpServer` or `Server`. If `grep -ri taskstore --exclude-dir=node_modules .` finds nothing, you are not affected. Affected versions: `@modelcontextprotocol/sdk` 1.
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is GHSA-22jm-h49p-29qw in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

MCP TypeScript SDK: Experimental tasks were not tied to…