CVE-2026-73229 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) Information Exposure vulnerability in djangorestframework. A fix is available for djangorestframework — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Django REST framework: AdminRenderer may disclose GET-protected data when rendering invalid write requests
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-73229.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-73229 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 390,400 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
djangorestframeworkReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
AdminRenderer may disclose data that would normally be protected by GET permissions when rendering a 400 Bad Request response for an invalid write request.
If a view allows POST (or another write method) but denies GET, an invalid request rendered through AdminRenderer can invoke the view's GET handler and include data from the GET representation in the generated HTML response.
This behavior appears to be specific to AdminRenderer and does not affect the normal JSON rendering path.
Details
While investigating the AdminRenderer rendering flow, I observed that invalid write requests are rendered by temporarily overriding the request method and invoking the view's GET handler:
with override_method(view, request, "GET") as request:
response = view.get(request, *view.args, **view.kwargs)
data = response.data
This execution path differs from a normal GET request.
Under normal request processing, a GET request flows through:
APIView.dispatch()
└── APIView.initial()
└── APIView.check_permissions()
However, during AdminRenderer rendering, the renderer directly invokes:
view.get(...)
A view whose permission class explicitly allowed POST but denied GET still executed its GET handler while rendering an invalid POST request through AdminRenderer.
As a result, data intended to be available only through an authorized GET request was included in the generated HTML response.
Proof of Concept
Using a standard ListCreateAPIView.
Permission class:
class ProbePermission(BasePermission):
def has_permission(self, request, view):
return request.method == "POST"
View:
class View(ListCreateAPIView):
renderer_classes = (AdminRenderer, JSONRenderer)
permission_classes = (ProbePermission,)
serializer_class = ProbeSerializer
def get_queryset(self):
return [
{
"name": "visible",
"secret": "GET-ONLY-SECRET",
}
]
Expected Behaviour
GET request
→ 403 Forbidden
Invalid POST request
→ 400 Bad Request
→ Response should contain only validation errors.
→ GET-only data should not be rendered.
Observed Behaviour
GET request
→ 403 Forbidden
Invalid POST request rendered through AdminRenderer
→ 400 Bad Request
→ HTML response contains:
GET-ONLY-SECRET
Tthe same behavior is shown using a minimal APIView implementation.
Observed results:
minimal.post_400.handler_calls =
[
("post", "POST"),
("get", "GET")
]
minimal.post_400.contains_secret = True
Generic view reproduction:
generic.direct_get.status = 403
generic.direct_get.contains_secret = False
generic.post_400.status = 400
generic.post_400.contains_secret = True
generic.post_400.permission_calls =
[
("GenericAdminView", "POST"),
...
("GenericAdminView", "OPTIONS")
]
generic.post_400.queryset_calls =
[
("GenericAdminView", "GET"),
...
]
These observations indicate that direct GET requests are correctly denied, while the simulated GET used during AdminRenderer rendering can still retrieve the protected representation.
Impact
This issue may result in information disclosure when all of the following conditions are met:
AdminRenderer is enabled.
The client negotiates the HTML renderer (for example using Accept: text/html).
The application permits POST (or another write method).
GET requests are denied by the configured permission class.
The invalid write request returns 400 Bad Request.
The GET representation contains information that the requester would normally not be permitted to access.
This issue does not appear to affect:
JSON rendering
Standard API responses
Successful write requests
The behavior appears limited to the HTML rendering path used by AdminRenderer.
Suggested Fix
Possible approaches include:
Perform equivalent permission checks before executing the simulated GET request.
Avoid invoking view.get() when the corresponding GET request would not be permitted.
Fall back to rendering only serializer/form validation errors instead of retrieving the GET representation.
A regression test could create a permission class that allows POST while denying GET, then verify that an invalid POST rendered with AdminRenderer does not include data from the protected GET representation.
Environment
Repository:
encode/django-rest-framework
Branch tested:
security-audit-drf
Commit tested:
cf582fb58e9e5ffcc8ed78a2cb9aaa8f4865666a
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | djangorestframework | all versions | 3.17.2pip install --upgrade 'djangorestframework==3.17.2' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for djangorestframework, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update djangorestframework to 3.17.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-73229 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This vulnerability is rated as Moderate impact because information exposure is restricted to scenarios where the AdminRenderer HTML renderer is explicitly utilized alongside asymmetric permissions that forbid read operations while allowing writes. In typical Red Hat deployments, API services predominantly process JSON…
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-73229 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-73229 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.