CVE-2026-64684 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.8) Information Exposure vulnerability in rmcp. A fix is available for rmcp — see the affected versions and patch details below.
RMCP: Custom HTTP headers leak to cross-origin redirect targets
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-64684.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
rmcpReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects crates.io packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
The rmcp crate's StreamableHttpClientTransport forwards caller-supplied custom HTTP headers (such as X-API-Key, X-Auth-Token, Api-Key) to cross-origin redirect targets. The default_http_client() function builds a reqwest::Client without a redirect policy override, so the default limited(10) policy follows 307/308 redirects and forwards all per-request headers except Authorization, Cookie, and Proxy-Authorization. Custom auth headers injected via StreamableHttpClientTransportConfig.custom_headers are not classified as sensitive and are therefore forwarded verbatim to any redirect target — including an attacker-controlled server.
Affected versions
- Repository:
github.com/modelcontextprotocol/rust-sdk - Crate:
rmcp - Commit tested:
c330fede90e4729c234f8e87fdbc5ea27a1dd10c(HEAD, 2026-05-21)
Vulnerability
File: crates/rmcp/src/transport/common/reqwest/streamable_http_client.rs
Root cause 1 — no redirect policy override:
// Lines 302-307
fn default_http_client() -> reqwest::Client {
reqwest::Client::builder()
.pool_max_idle_per_host(0)
.build()
.expect("failed to build default reqwest client")
}
No .redirect(reqwest::redirect::Policy::none()) call. The default limited(10) policy follows up to 10 redirects and, on cross-origin redirects, strips only Authorization, Cookie, and Proxy-Authorization.
Root cause 2 — custom headers not sensitivity-marked:
// Lines 26-35
fn apply_custom_headers(
mut builder: reqwest::RequestBuilder,
custom_headers: HashMap<HeaderName, HeaderValue>,
) -> Result<reqwest::RequestBuilder, StreamableHttpError<reqwest::Error>> {
for (name, value) in custom_headers {
validate_custom_header(&name).map_err(StreamableHttpError::ReservedHeaderConflict)?;
builder = builder.header(name, value); // no sensitivity marker
}
Ok(builder)
}
Headers added via RequestBuilder::header() are forwarded to redirect targets because reqwest only strips headers from its own sensitive-header list (Authorization, Cookie, Proxy-Authorization).
Exposed API: StreamableHttpClientTransportConfig.custom_headers (line 1070), intended for custom auth headers:
/// Custom HTTP headers to include with every request
pub custom_headers: HashMap<HeaderName, HeaderValue>,
Attack scenario
- A caller sets
custom_headerswith an API key for the MCP server:let config = StreamableHttpClientTransportConfig::with_uri("https://mcp.example.com/mcp") .custom_headers([(HeaderName::from_static("x-api-key"), HeaderValue::from_static("my-secret-key"))].into()); - An attacker compromises
mcp.example.comto return307 Temporary Redirecttohttps://attacker.example.net/capture. rmcpfollows the redirect, forwardingX-API-Key: my-secret-keytoattacker.example.net.- The attacker captures the secret and reuses it to call the MCP server directly.
Negative control
The auth_header path (StreamableHttpClientTransportConfig::auth_header()) sets the value via builder.bearer_auth(auth_header), which maps to the Authorization header — stripped by reqwest on cross-origin redirects. That path is not affected. Only custom_headers is vulnerable.
Fix
In default_http_client(), disable automatic redirect following:
fn default_http_client() -> reqwest::Client {
reqwest::Client::builder()
.pool_max_idle_per_host(0)
.redirect(reqwest::redirect::Policy::none()) // <-- add this
.build()
.expect("failed to build default reqwest client")
}
The transport can then inspect 3xx responses and decide whether to follow, stripping sensitive headers before doing so. Alternatively, use reqwest::ClientBuilder::connection_verbose or per-request Request::headers_mut() to remove auth headers before the redirect is followed.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦀crates.io | rmcp | all versions | 2.1.0cargo update -p rmcp --precise 2.1.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for rmcp, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update rmcp to 2.1.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-64684 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Assume what was exposed is already known: rotate any credential, token or key that the affected component could return, restrict the endpoint to callers that genuinely need it, and strip sensitive fields from responses and error output at the boundary rather than relying on the client not to read them.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
Mitigation for this issue is either not available or the currently available options do not meet the Red Hat Product Security criteria comprising ease of use and deployment, applicability to widespread installation base, or stability.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-64684 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-64684 in your dependencies?
Find it across crates.io, including transitive dependencies.