CVE-2026-62949 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) CWE-835 vulnerability in asyncssh. A fix is available for asyncssh — see the affected versions and patch details below.
AsyncSSH: asyncio event-loop freeze via SSH maximum packet size = 0 in SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN / OPEN_CONFIRMATION
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-62949.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
Where this sits among everything scored
Real-World Exposure
asyncsshReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
A malicious SSH server can wedge an AsyncSSH client, and an authenticated
client can wedge an AsyncSSH server, by sending a channel maximum packet size of 0 in SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN_CONFIRMATION (server→client) or
SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN (client→server). AsyncSSH stores the peer-supplied value
verbatim with no lower-bound check; the first time channel data is written,
SSHChannel._flush_send_buf enters a synchronous infinite loop that cannot
be interrupted by asyncio.wait_for or any timeout. The loop body has no
await, so it blocks the entire asyncio event loop — for a server, one
malicious authenticated channel freezes all current and future connections.
RFC 4254 §5.1 leaves receiver behavior for a peer-reported "maximum packet size = 0" undefined, so the value must be rejected rather than stored.
Root cause
asyncssh/channel.py:
# process_open (server side) -- line 465
self._send_pktsize = send_pktsize # peer value, no >= 1 check
# process_open_confirmation (client) -- line 528
self._send_pktsize = send_pktsize # peer value, no >= 1 check
# _flush_send_buf -- lines 305-320
while self._send_buf and self._send_window:
pktsize = min(self._send_window, self._send_pktsize) # 0 when peer sends 0
buf, datatype = self._send_buf[0]
if len(buf) > pktsize: # True for any buffered data
data = buf[:pktsize] # empty (b'')
del buf[:pktsize] # no-op
...
self._send_window -= len(data) # -= 0, unchanged
With _send_pktsize == 0, pktsize is 0, so buf[:0] is empty,
del buf[:0] is a no-op, and _send_window is never decremented — the
while condition is permanently true, and with no await in the body the
event loop is blocked.
Impact
- Client vector (primary): a malicious SSH server replies to the client's
channel open with
maximum packet size = 0; the client wedges on its first channel write. The attacker is the server, so it needs no valid credentials. - Server vector: an authenticated client opens a channel with
maximum packet size = 0; any server-side channel write wedges the AsyncSSH server's event loop, freezing every current and future connection. A single low-privilege account can take the whole server down.
Both vectors are a single SSH message, deterministic, and cause total availability loss for the affected process.
Affected versions
<= 2.23.1 (latest release, 2026-06-06); also present on master
(channel.py:465/528 unguarded). Verified end-to-end on 2.23.1.
Verification
The maintainer's proposed fix (reject send_pktsize == 0 in connection.py
_process_channel_open / _process_channel_open_confirmation) was applied to
2.23.1 and re-tested end-to-end over TCP:
- Unpatched: malicious server (paramiko forcing
max_packet_size=0in OPEN_CONFIRMATION) + real asyncssh client → client event loop wedges. - Patched: the guard fires inside
_process_channel_open_confirmation, the malicious value is rejected, the connection closes cleanly (ChannelOpenError: SSH connection closed), and the client does not wedge.
The maintainer (Ron Frederick) independently confirmed the freeze and noted that even shutting the server down does not break clients out of the loop.
Reproducers available: a focused harness driving the real
SSHChannel._flush_send_buf with _send_pktsize=0, and an end-to-end
malicious_server.py (paramiko) + client.py (real asyncssh) pair. The
end-to-end client repro uses asyncio.new_event_loop() (not get_event_loop())
for Python 3.14 compatibility.
Suggested fix (maintainer's approach)
In connection.py, after each send_pktsize = packet.get_uint32() in
_process_channel_open and _process_channel_open_confirmation:
if send_pktsize == 0:
raise ProtocolError('Invalid maximum packet size')
CVSS
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H (6.5 Medium). An earlier draft
quoted 7.5 High ("100% CPU"); the synchronous loop burns ~100% of one core's
worth of CPU but, being single-threaded, the OS scheduler spreads it across
cores, so the real impact is event-loop / connection freeze, not machine-wide
CPU exhaustion.
References
- RFC 4254 §5.1 (channel "maximum packet size"; behavior for 0 is undefined).
- The same
maximum packet size = 0send-loop wedge was confirmed in several other independent SSH implementations (different languages/runtimes) and reported to each maintainer separately.
Credits
Reported by zhangph (afldl), 2026-06-20.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | asyncssh | all versions | 2.24.0pip install --upgrade 'asyncssh==2.24.0' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for asyncssh, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update asyncssh to 2.24.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-62949 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
A denial of service vulnerability was found in AsyncSSH, a Python asynchronous SSHv2 client and server implementation. Prior to version 2.24.0, the _process_channel_open and _process_channel_open_confirmation functions in asyncssh/connection.py accept a peer supplied send_pktsize value of zero. When channel data is…
Until updates are available, administrators can implement the following mitigations to reduce the risk of event loop freeze attacks: 1. Restrict SSH connectivity for Ceph management and orchestration tools to trusted SSH servers only. Use firewall rules or network policies to prevent connections to untrusted or internet-exposed SSH servers. 2. If using asyncssh-based SSH servers, implement authentication and connection rate limiting to prevent abuse from authenticated attackers attempting to freeze the service. 3. Monitor Ceph management processes for unexpected hangs or unresponsive behavior, and implement automated health checks that can detect and restart frozen processes. 4. Consider…Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-62949 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-62949 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.