CVE-2026-62314 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.8) CWE-284 vulnerability in github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis. A fix is available for github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Anubis: Policy bypass via client controlled X-Original-URI header
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-62314.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-62314 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 383,485 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
github.com/TecharoHQ/anubisReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Go packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Any HTTP client can bypass Anubis bot protection on the default configuration by adding a single request header. No challenge needs to be solved. Affected versions: v1.22.0 through v1.25.0 (introduced in commit d1d631a, PR #1015)
The root cause is in lib/policy/checker.go, PathChecker.Check():
func (pc *PathChecker) Check(r *http.Request) (bool, error) {
originalUrl := r.Header.Get("X-Original-URI")
if originalUrl != "" {
if pc.regexp.MatchString(originalUrl) {
return true, nil
}
}
if pc.regexp.MatchString(r.URL.Path) {
return true, nil
}
return false, nil
}
The header value comes directly from the client request. The middleware chain never strips it. In reverse proxy mode an attacker fully controls it.
The default policy imports data/common/keep-internet-working.yaml, which contains path-only ALLOW rules with no other conditions:
- name: well-known
path_regex: ^/\.well-known/.*$
action: ALLOW
When X-Original-URI matches one of those regexes, the rule fires as ALLOW and the request is forwarded upstream without any challenge or JWT check.
Proof of concept
Normal request, gets challenged:
curl -s https://anubis.techaro.lol/ | grep -o "<title>.*</title>"
Bypass, gets upstream content:
curl -s -H "X-Original-URI: /.well-known/x" https://anubis.techaro.lol/ | grep -o "<title>.*</title>"
The first command returns the Anubis challenge page title. The second returns the real site title directly, with no cookie set and no challenge issued. Verified live against anubis.techaro.lol.
Suggested fix
The fix should probably be to strip the header from incoming client requests in the middleware chain before policy evaluation. In auth_request mode the header is set by the proxy after Anubis processes the middleware, so stripping it at ingress does not break that deployment mode.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐹Go | github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis | ≥ 1.22.0&&< 1.26.0 | 1.26.0go get github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis@v1.26.0 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update github.com/TecharoHQ/anubis to 1.26.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-62314 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-62314 in your dependencies?
Find it across Go, including transitive dependencies.