CVE-2026-59949 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.5) NULL Pointer Dereference vulnerability in at.yawk.lz4:lz4-java. A fix is available for at.yawk.lz4:lz4-java — see the affected versions and patch details below.
yawkat LZ4 Java: JVM Crash via Null Byte Array in lz4-java Streaming XXHash JNI (StreamingXXHash32JNI / StreamingXXHash64JNI)
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-59949 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,803 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
at.yawk.lz4:lz4-java☕org.lz4:lz4-javaReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Insufficient validation of byte array arguments in JNI-based XXHash implementations in lz4-java 1.11.0 and earlier allows callers to crash the JVM by passing an invalid array reference or invalid range to native XXHash methods.
This affects applications where an attacker can influence the byte array object or the off / len arguments passed to affected XXHash APIs. It does not affect the common case where only the contents of a valid byte array are attacker-controlled.
Java-based XXHash implementations are not affected.
Details
The JNI-backed XXHash implementations pass caller-provided byte array arguments to native code. The affected APIs are:
XXHashFactory.nativeInstance().hash32().hash(byte[] buf, int off, int len, int seed)XXHashFactory.nativeInstance().hash64().hash(byte[] buf, int off, int len, long seed)XXHashFactory.nativeInstance().newStreamingHash32(seed).update(byte[] bytes, int off, int len)XXHashFactory.nativeInstance().newStreamingHash64(seed).update(byte[] bytes, int off, int len)
Before the fix, the streaming JNI implementations did not validate bytes, off, or len before calling XXHashJNI.XXH32_update / XXHashJNI.XXH64_update. The non-streaming JNI implementations called SafeUtils.checkRange, but SafeUtils.checkRange(byte[], int, int) skipped all array access when len == 0, so a null byte array with a zero length could still reach JNI.
As a result:
hash(null, 0, 0, seed)andupdate(null, 0, 0)could pass a null array reference to JNI, causing a fatal JVM crash inGetPrimitiveArrayCritical.update(new byte[16], 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE)could cause native XXHash code to read far beyond the end of the Java array, causing a fatal JVM crash and potentially exposing in-process memory to the native routine before the crash.
The oversized-length non-streaming hash(new byte[16], 0, Integer.MAX_VALUE, seed) case was already rejected in Java before this fix. The missing validation affected the streaming oversized-length case and the zero-length null-array case for both streaming and non-streaming JNI XXHash APIs.
The impact of this vulnerability depends on how user code uses the XXHash API. Code that hashes attacker-controlled byte contents in a valid, correctly bounded array is not affected. Code may be affected if an attacker can cause the application to pass a null array, an attacker-controlled offset, or an attacker-controlled length to the native XXHash API. The primary impact is denial of service due to JVM termination. For oversized lengths, native code may also read outside the Java array before the process crashes.
Mitigation
lz4-java 1.11.1 fixes this issue without requiring changes in user code.
If you cannot upgrade, avoid passing attacker-controlled array references, offsets, or lengths to JNI-backed XXHash APIs. In particular, validate that arrays are non-null and that off and len describe a range fully contained in the array before calling native XXHash methods.
Using XXHashFactory.safeInstance() avoids the JNI boundary and is not affected by this native crash behavior.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | at.yawk.lz4:lz4-java | all versions | 1.11.1at.yawk.lz4:lz4-java:1.11.1 |
| ☕Maven | org.lz4:lz4-java | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for at.yawk.lz4:lz4-java, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update at.yawk.lz4:lz4-java to 1.11.1 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-59949 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
A flaw was found in the lz4-java library's JNI-backed XXHash implementations. The native XXHash methods (hash32, hash64, streamingHash32, streamingHash64) obtained via XXHashFactory.nativeInstance() do not properly validate byte array arguments, offsets, and lengths before passing them to native code. An attacker able…
Use XXHashFactory.safeInstance() or XXHashFactory.fastestJavaInstance() instead of XXHashFactory.nativeInstance() to avoid the JNI boundary. Alternatively, validate that arrays are non-null and that offset and length parameters describe a range fully contained in the array before calling native XXHash methods.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-59949 (CC BY 4.0)
| Product | Fixed in | Advisory |
|---|---|---|
| Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.27.6.redhat | at.yawk.lz4/lz4-java:1.11.1.rhel8-redhat-00001 | RHSA-2026:83082 |
| Red Hat build of Quarkus 3.33.4.redhat | at.yawk.lz4/lz4-java:1.11.1.rhel8-redhat-00001 | RHSA-2026:83520 |
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-59949 in your dependencies?
Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.