CVE-2026-59927 is a medium-severity (CVSS 5.3) CWE-674 vulnerability in mistune. A fix is available for mistune — see the affected versions and patch details below.
Mistune directives/include: mutual `.. include::` recursion crashes the renderer with `RecursionError`, denial of service via two attacker-controlled markdown files
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-59927.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-59927 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 395,249 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
mistuneReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
Type: Uncontrolled recursion via mutual include. The Include directive checks for direct self-reference (a.md cannot include a.md), but does not detect indirect cycles. Two markdown files that include each other (a.md → includes b.md → includes a.md) cause unbounded recursion until Python's stack limit fires RecursionError. The exception propagates out of the renderer and crashes the calling code.
File: src/mistune/directives/include.py, lines 33-37 (the self-include check is the only cycle-detection logic).
Root cause: the include logic only compares os.path.abspath(dest) == os.path.abspath(source_file). There is no per-render set of "files already included" that would catch transitive cycles. When a.md includes b.md, the recursive block.parse(new_state) call uses dest (b.md) as the new __file__, which then includes a.md (passing the self-check, because the immediate parent file is b.md, not a.md), which then includes b.md, and so on. Each recursion level adds Python frames; the default stack limit of 1000 frames trips after ~7-10 cycle iterations and Python raises RecursionError. Since the directive does not catch the exception, it propagates out of Markdown.parse() and surfaces in the calling code, crashing the request.
Affected Code
File: src/mistune/directives/include.py, lines 28-54.
relpath = self.parse_title(m)
dest = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(source_file), relpath)
dest = os.path.normpath(dest)
if os.path.abspath(dest) == os.path.abspath(source_file): # <-- only catches direct self-include
return {"type": "block_error", "raw": "Could not include self: " + relpath}
if not os.path.isfile(dest):
return {"type": "block_error", "raw": "Could not find file: " + relpath}
with open(dest, "rb") as f:
content = f.read().decode(encoding)
ext = os.path.splitext(relpath)[1]
if ext in {".md", ".markdown", ".mkd"}:
new_state = block.state_cls()
new_state.env["__file__"] = dest
new_state.process(content)
block.parse(new_state) # <-- recursive parse, no cycle tracking
return new_state.tokens
Why it's wrong: the cycle-detection check is one level deep. Multi-file cycles slip through trivially. Python's default recursion limit is 1000 frames, so a cycle of length 2 trips after a few hundred mutual includes; the exception is uncaught by the directive, propagating out of Markdown.__call__() and crashing whatever called it.
Exploit Chain
- Application uses mistune with the
Includedirective enabled. Application accepts user-supplied markdown files (CMS, wiki, multi-user documentation platform, note-taking app, CI/CD doc renderer). - Attacker uploads two markdown files:
a.md:.. include:: b.mdb.md:.. include:: a.md
- Renderer is invoked on
a.md(or any markdown that references this pair).Includedirective includesb.md, which includesa.md, which includesb.md, ... Each recursion adds Python frames. - After ~340 cycle iterations (depending on default
sys.setrecursionlimit(1000)and the per-include frame depth), Python raisesRecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded. - The exception is not caught by the directive. It propagates through
block.parse, throughMarkdown.__call__, and into the application's request handler. If the application doesn't catch it explicitly, the request errors out (HTTP 500 in web contexts, crash in CLI tools).
Security Impact
Attacker capability: crash the rendering engine on demand by submitting any markdown that triggers the cycle. Repeated requests deny service. If the renderer is used in a hot path (per-page-view docs rendering, search-index regeneration, scheduled doc-export jobs), the cycle persists across the whole pipeline.
Preconditions: application uses mistune with the Include directive enabled and renders user-supplied markdown that can reference other user-uploaded files. Attacker needs write access to two .md files in the include search path (or a single file including a known-recurring pair).
Differential: PoC-verified against [email protected]:
import os, mistune
from mistune.directives import RSTDirective, Include
os.makedirs('/tmp/mistune-recur', exist_ok=True)
with open('/tmp/mistune-recur/a.md', 'w') as f:
f.write('A\n\n.. include:: b.md')
with open('/tmp/mistune-recur/b.md', 'w') as f:
f.write('B\n\n.. include:: a.md')
md = mistune.create_markdown(plugins=[RSTDirective([Include()])])
state = md.block.state_cls()
state.env['__file__'] = '/tmp/mistune-recur/a.md'
md.parse('.. include:: b.md', state=state)
# RecursionError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
The patched build (with the suggested fix below) returns a block_error token like the existing self-include check, instead of recursing forever.
Suggested Fix
Track included paths in state.env and reject any include that would re-enter a path already on the include stack:
--- a/src/mistune/directives/include.py
+++ b/src/mistune/directives/include.py
@@ -28,8 +28,18 @@ class Include(DirectivePlugin):
relpath = self.parse_title(m)
- dest = os.path.join(os.path.dirname(source_file), relpath)
- dest = os.path.normpath(dest)
+ base = os.path.realpath(os.path.dirname(source_file))
+ dest = os.path.realpath(os.path.join(base, relpath))
+
+ # Track include stack across recursive parses to detect cycles.
+ include_stack = state.env.setdefault("__include_stack__", [])
+ if dest in include_stack or dest == os.path.realpath(source_file):
+ return {
+ "type": "block_error",
+ "raw": "Could not include (cycle): " + relpath,
+ }
- if os.path.abspath(dest) == os.path.abspath(source_file):
- return {
- "type": "block_error",
- "raw": "Could not include self: " + relpath,
- }
@@ ... in the markdown-include branch ...
+ include_stack.append(dest)
+ try:
+ new_state = block.state_cls()
+ new_state.env["__file__"] = dest
+ new_state.env["__include_stack__"] = include_stack
+ new_state.process(content)
+ block.parse(new_state)
+ return new_state.tokens
+ finally:
+ include_stack.pop()
This catches cycles of any length (a → b → a, a → b → c → a, etc.). Pair this with the path-containment fix from the LFI advisory and the HTML-extension fix from the include-XSS advisory; together those three patches make the Include directive safe to enable on user-supplied markdown.
Add a regression test asserting that a 2-cycle and a 3-cycle both produce block_error rather than RecursionError.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | mistune | all versions | 3.3.0pip install --upgrade 'mistune==3.3.0' |
Affected Products
mistunemistune_projectDetection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for mistune, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update mistune to 3.3.0 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-59927 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Escape or sanitise the affected output on the server side rather than relying on client-side filtering, and add a Content-Security-Policy that blocks inline script execution so injected markup cannot run even if it reaches the page.
Fixing This On Your OS
If you run this on a Linux distribution, patch through your package manager against the distro's own security advisory below — it tracks the exact backported fix for your release, which can ship on a different timeline (and sometimes a different severity) than the upstream project.
This flaw in the Mistune Include directive can cause a denial of service when an application explicitly enables the Include plugin and renders user-controlled Markdown files from disk. Exploitation requires an attacker to place at least two coordinated Markdown files on the include search path; default Mistune…
To mitigate this issue, Red Hat recommends avoiding the processing of untrusted Markdown content that may contain recursively linked include directives. Users should ensure that any Markdown files processed by applications utilizing Mistune are from trusted sources or are thoroughly sanitized to prevent indirect cyclic inclusions.Source: Red Hat security advisory for CVE-2026-59927 (CC BY 4.0)
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-59927 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.