CVE-2026-57124
CRITICALCVE-2026-57124 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) OS Command Injection vulnerability in praisonai. O3 Security confirms whether CVE-2026-57124 is actually reachable in your code before you act, and blocks exploitation at runtime until you patch.
PraisonAI: Missing Authentication for Critical Function and Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') in praisonai
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-57124.
Real-World Exposure
praisonaiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Unauthenticated PraisonAI UI MCP connect endpoint executes attacker-chosen local commands
Summary
PraisonAI v4.6.48 exposes the PraisonAIUI MCP client management API through the default UI host apps without authentication. A remote unauthenticated client can send POST /api/mcp/connect with a command and args field. The endpoint passes those values into the MCP stdio client, which starts the attacker-selected local process as the PraisonAI UI service user.
The issue is reachable through PraisonAI's hosted UI integration (praisonai ui, praisonai ui agents, praisonai claw, and any app using praisonai.integration.host_app.create_host_app() / build_host_app()). praisonai ui and related Typer UI commands bind to 0.0.0.0 by default.
Affected Versions
Confirmed affected:
praisonaiv4.6.48- Commit tested:
d5f1114aaf1a2e9f121a6e66b929149ca2201f1d - Tag tested:
v4.6.48 - Pinned UI dependency:
aiui==0.3.121fromsrc/praisonai/uv.lock
Likely affected:
- Any PraisonAI release that exposes
aiui/praisonaiuicreate_app()through the PraisonAI UI host apps without authentication and includes themcpdependency. I only confirmed the latest release during this audit.
Severity
Reasoning:
AV: the vulnerable endpoint is an HTTP API route.AC: a single POST request is sufficient.PR: default UI host apps do not require credentials unless opt-in auth is configured.UI: no victim interaction is needed after the server is running.S: code executes in the PraisonAI UI server process context.C/I/A: arbitrary local command execution permits secret exfiltration, file tampering, and service disruption.
Root Cause
PraisonAI depends on MCP by default and exposes PraisonAIUI via optional UI extras:
src/praisonai/pyproject.toml:11includes base dependencies.src/praisonai/pyproject.toml:19includesmcp>=1.20.0.src/praisonai/pyproject.toml:25defines theuiextra withaiui>=0.3.121,<0.4.src/praisonai/pyproject.toml:197defines theclawextra withaiui[all]>=0.3.121,<0.4.
PraisonAI's UI commands bind externally by default and launch aiui run:
src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/ui.py:114setshost="0.0.0.0"forpraisonai ui.src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/ui.py:163passes that host toaiui run.src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/ui.py:186,:204, and:222also default subcommands to0.0.0.0.src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/claw.py:41defines the full dashboard command.src/praisonai/praisonai/cli/commands/claw.py:93launchesaiui runwith the selected host.
PraisonAI's default apps create the PraisonAIUI Starlette app without forcing authentication:
src/praisonai/praisonai/ui_chat/default_app.py:18callsconfigure_host(...).src/praisonai/praisonai/ui_chat/default_app.py:142exportsapp = create_host_app().src/praisonai/praisonai/claw/default_app.py:63callsconfigure_host(...).src/praisonai/praisonai/claw/default_app.py:128exportsapp = create_host_app().src/praisonai/praisonai/integration/host_app.py:174importspraisonaiui.server.create_app.src/praisonai/praisonai/integration/host_app.py:180returnscreate_app().
In aiui==0.3.121, the exposed server registers the MCP routes and auth is opt-in:
praisonaiui/server.py:1483definesapi_mcp_connect.praisonaiui/server.py:1488reads attacker-controlled JSON.praisonaiui/server.py:1491accepts eithercommandorurl.praisonaiui/server.py:1496callsconnect_mcp_server(body).praisonaiui/server.py:2516definescreate_app(..., require_auth=False, ...).praisonaiui/server.py:2550addsAuthEnforcementMiddleware, but it only enforces auth whenAUTH_ENFORCE=true.praisonaiui/server.py:2769registers/api/mcp/servers.praisonaiui/server.py:2770registers/api/mcp/connect.
The MCP feature converts the request body into a local process launch:
praisonaiui/features/mcp.py:325definesconnect_server(self, server_config).praisonaiui/features/mcp.py:330chooses stdio transport whencommandis present.praisonaiui/features/mcp.py:332constructsStdioMCPClient(command=server_config["command"], args=server_config.get("args", [])).praisonaiui/features/mcp.py:360callsclient.connect(), which invokes the MCP stdio transport and starts the process.
Minimal PoC
PoC file: poc/praisonai-aiui-mcp-connect-rce.py
The PoC runs the PraisonAI host app in-process, sends the unauthenticated HTTP request, and asks the server to execute /usr/bin/touch /tmp/praisonai_host_app_mcp_touch_marker.txt. It does not contact an LLM provider and uses no credentials.
Observed output from the tested checkout with aiui==0.3.121 and mcp==1.25.0 available:
[19:19:55] server.py:229 WARNING No auth_token provided for Gateway server. Generated temporary token: gw_****650a. For production, set GATEWAY_AUTH_TOKEN.
[19:19:55] mcp.py:135 ERROR Failed to connect to MCP stdio server: 'tuple' object has no attribute 'initialize'
HTTP_STATUS= 200
RESPONSE= {"server":{"name":"poc-stdio-process-0","transport":"stdio","status":"error","tools":[],"last_error":"Connection failed"}}
SUCCESS_AT_ATTEMPT= 0
MARKER_EXISTS= True
MARKER_PATH= /tmp/praisonai_host_app_mcp_touch_marker.txt
The MCP handshake fails because aiui==0.3.121 is not compatible with the locked mcp==1.25.0 return shape, but the attacker-selected process is already started. Process startup can race the immediate teardown caused by this version mismatch, so the checked-in PoC retries the same unauthenticated request until /usr/bin/touch wins scheduling and creates the marker. The marker file proves local command execution despite the reported MCP connection error.
Exploit Scenario
An operator runs:
pip install "praisonai[ui]"
praisonai ui
Because praisonai ui binds to 0.0.0.0 by default and the generated app does not require authentication by default, any host that can reach the UI port can send:
POST /api/mcp/connect
Content-Type: application/json
{
"name": "evil",
"command": "/usr/bin/touch",
"args": ["/tmp/pwned-by-ui-mcp"]
}
In a real attack, the command can be replaced with a shell, a credential exfiltration command, a file modification command, or a payload that starts a long-lived process as the PraisonAI UI server user.
Novelty / Non-Duplicate Analysis
Searched sources:
- OSV query for PyPI
praisonai: 51 advisories returned. - OSV query for PyPI
aiui: 0 advisories returned. - OSV query for PyPI
praisonaiui: 0 advisories returned. - GitHub Advisory Database search for exact
/api/mcp/connect,api_mcp_connect,StdioMCPClient,connect_mcp_server, andpraisonaiui.features.mcp. - NVD API searches for
PraisonAI StdioMCPClient,PraisonAI api_mcp_connect,PraisonAI /api/mcp/connect,PraisonAIUI /api/mcp/connect, andaiui StdioMCPClient: 0 results. - GitHub issue/PR searches in
MervinPraison/PraisonAIfor exact endpoint/function/class terms. Only one unrelated PR was returned for/api/mcp/connect; no issue/PR matchedapi_mcp_connect,StdioMCPClient,connect_mcp_server, orpraisonaiui.features.mcp. - Broad web searches for exact endpoint, file, class, and function terms returned no matching public vulnerability report.
Why this is distinct from known PraisonAI advisories:
- Not the excluded
praisonai serve agents --api-key/agentsauth bypass. This report targetsPOST /api/mcp/connectin the PraisonAIUI host app. - Not GHSA-9gm9-c8mq-vq7m / CVE-2026-34935 or GHSA-9qhq-v63v-fv3j / CVE-2026-41497. Those involve
MCPHandler.parse_mcp_command()command parsing. This finding usespraisonaiui.server.api_mcp_connect -> praisonaiui.features.mcp.connect_mcp_server -> StdioMCPClient. - Not GHSA-pj2r-f9mw-vrcq / CVE-2026-40159. That advisory concerns sensitive environment variables inherited by untrusted MCP subprocesses. This finding is unauthenticated network-triggered local process execution.
- Not GHSA-6rmh-7xcm-cpxj or GHSA-8444-4fhq-fxpq. Those concern unauthenticated legacy/generated agent servers. This is a distinct UI route and a distinct sink that starts arbitrary local processes.
- Not GHSA-9cr9-25q5-8prj, GHSA-9mqq-jqxf-grvw, or other MCP server file-read/path-traversal advisories. This path is the UI MCP client connector, not PraisonAI's MCP server tool dispatcher.
Recommended Fix
- Remove arbitrary
command/argsfrom the remote HTTP API. MCP stdio servers should be configured only from trusted local configuration, not caller-supplied JSON. - Require authentication and authorization on
/api/mcp/connect,/api/mcp/disconnect/*, and/api/mcp/serversregardless ofAUTH_ENFORCE. - Change UI command defaults from
0.0.0.0to127.0.0.1, or require an explicit--unsafe-exposestyle flag when binding externally without auth. - If remote MCP registration is a required feature, allow only URL-based transports with SSRF protections, or maintain an administrator-configured allowlist of commands.
- Add regression tests that unauthenticated requests to
/api/mcp/connectcannot start a subprocess, including whenAUTH_ENFORCEis unset.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | praisonai | all versions | 4.6.59 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai. O3's reachability analysis confirms whether the vulnerable code path is actually invoked in your application, so you act on real exposure instead of every transitive match.
Fix
Update praisonai to 4.6.59 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-57124 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
If you can't upgrade right away: gate or disable the affected feature, validate untrusted input at the boundary, and avoid passing attacker-controlled data into the vulnerable path. O3's runtime protection blocks exploitation in production as an interim safeguard until the upgrade lands.
How O3 protects you
O3 pinpoints whether CVE-2026-57124 is reachable in your code and exactly where to fix it, then blocks exploitation in production at runtime until the patched version is deployed.
Tailored to CVE-2026-57124. Runtime protection reduces exposure until a permanent patch is applied and verified — it complements patching, it doesn't replace it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-57124 in your dependencies?
O3 detects CVE-2026-57124 across PyPI dependencies and uses function-level reachability to confirm whether the vulnerable code path is actually reachable — not just present. No false positives.