CVE-2026-56676 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.4) CWE-367 vulnerability in 9router. A fix is available for 9router — see the affected versions and patch details below.
9router: Image prefetch DNS rebinding allows SSRF to internal services
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-56676.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-56676 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 394,415 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.
9routernpmDescription
Summary
9router validates image URLs by resolving the host before fetching, but the later server-side fetch performs a separate DNS resolution. An attacker-controlled DNS name can resolve to a public IP during validation and then rebind to an internal Docker/private IP during the fetch. This allows the server-side image prefetch to reach internal-only HTTP services (SSRF).
Details
- Affected version / commit: 9router
v0.4.80@b282f05. - Reachable through
/v1/chat/completionswith a vision-capable model and animage_urlcontent part. A vision-capable model name is required so the image survives modality stripping and the server-side prefetch is armed. - The provider used in this reproduction is the bundled mock provider — no real API key and no real provider call.
- internal-admin (the SSRF target) is not exposed to the host network; it is reachable only from inside the Docker network.
- rebind-dns behaviour for
rebind.9r.test:- first A response →
1.1.1.1(public) to pass the public-host guard, - second A response →
172.29.0.10(internal-admin) during the fetch.
- first A response →
- internal-admin logs
GET /ssrf-markerwithpeer=172.29.0.30(theproxied-routercontainer), proving the server-side fetch landed on the internal service. - mock-provider receives
POST /api/chatand the flow completes withHTTP 200. - Root cause: DNS TOCTOU — the IP is not pinned between the validation resolution (the public-host guard) and the fetch resolution. The guard and the fetch each resolve the hostname independently, so a TTL-0 rebinding authority can return a public IP to the guard and an internal IP to the fetch.
Proof of Concept
This repository is a self-contained Docker Compose reproduction. No real provider is called and no real API key is required.
- Build and start the stack:
docker compose up --build - Confirm
internal-adminis unreachable from the host:curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18083/ssrf-marker # connection refused / fail docker compose ps # internal-admin has NO host port mapping - Send the request named
POST image-prefetch DNS rebinding triggerfromrequests.http, or with curl:curl -i -X POST http://127.0.0.1:18082/v1/chat/completions \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{ "model": "ollama-local/gemma3", "messages": [{"role":"user","content":[ {"type":"text","text":"reproduction image-prefetch trigger"}, {"type":"image_url","image_url":{"url":"http://rebind.9r.test:8080/ssrf-marker?case=rebind-trigger"}} ]}], "stream": false }'
Impact
- SSRF to internal HTTP services reachable from the 9router host/container.
- Depending on the environment, this can reach cloud metadata endpoints, internal admin panels, or be used for internal service discovery.
- Blind / semi-blind SSRF when the fetched response is not returned to the attacker; an exfil variant (pointing the image at an internal endpoint that returns valid image bytes) can return internal content base64-encoded to the upstream.
- Requires a code path that prefetches/normalizes remote images for vision-capable providers.
- No real credential is needed for the reproduction.
Suggested Fix
- Pin the resolved IP after validation and connect to that IP (resolve once, then reuse the address for the fetch).
- Block private, loopback, link-local, multicast, and cloud-metadata ranges at connect time, not only at validation time.
- Perform DNS resolution and IP checks immediately before the request and against the address actually used to connect.
- Disable redirects, or re-validate every redirect target with the same checks.
- Enforce an allowlist for image-fetch domains where feasible.
- Add a timeout, a response size limit, and a content-type check.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 📦npm | 9router | all versions | 0.5.2npm install 9router@0.5.2 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for 9router, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update 9router to 0.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-56676 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-56676 in your dependencies?
Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.