Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
📦
📦 npm
Not in CISA KEV
HIGH severity

CVE-2026-56676 — 9router

HIGHFix: decolua/9router@c7d0744

CVE-2026-56676 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.4) CWE-367 vulnerability in 9router. A fix is available for 9router — see the affected versions and patch details below.

9router: Image prefetch DNS rebinding allows SSRF to internal services

Also known asGHSA-cmhj-wh2f-9cgx
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 20, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-56676.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs17th percentile — riskier than 17% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.00%0.25%0.51%0.76%0.2%0.3%0.3%0.3%Aug 26Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-56676 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 394,415 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected

How broadly this vulnerability is actually deployed: weekly install volume shows current usage, and reverse-dependency count shows how many other packages break if it stays unpatched.

2other npm packages depend on this — each one inherits the vulnerability until it's patched upstream
9routernpm
38Kdownloads / week

Description

Summary

9router validates image URLs by resolving the host before fetching, but the later server-side fetch performs a separate DNS resolution. An attacker-controlled DNS name can resolve to a public IP during validation and then rebind to an internal Docker/private IP during the fetch. This allows the server-side image prefetch to reach internal-only HTTP services (SSRF).

Details

  • Affected version / commit: 9router v0.4.80 @ b282f05.
  • Reachable through /v1/chat/completions with a vision-capable model and an image_url content part. A vision-capable model name is required so the image survives modality stripping and the server-side prefetch is armed.
  • The provider used in this reproduction is the bundled mock provider — no real API key and no real provider call.
  • internal-admin (the SSRF target) is not exposed to the host network; it is reachable only from inside the Docker network.
  • rebind-dns behaviour for rebind.9r.test:
    • first A response → 1.1.1.1 (public) to pass the public-host guard,
    • second A response → 172.29.0.10 (internal-admin) during the fetch.
  • internal-admin logs GET /ssrf-marker with peer=172.29.0.30 (the proxied-router container), proving the server-side fetch landed on the internal service.
  • mock-provider receives POST /api/chat and the flow completes with HTTP 200.
  • Root cause: DNS TOCTOU — the IP is not pinned between the validation resolution (the public-host guard) and the fetch resolution. The guard and the fetch each resolve the hostname independently, so a TTL-0 rebinding authority can return a public IP to the guard and an internal IP to the fetch.

Proof of Concept

This repository is a self-contained Docker Compose reproduction. No real provider is called and no real API key is required.

  1. Build and start the stack:
    docker compose up --build
    
  2. Confirm internal-admin is unreachable from the host:
    curl -i http://127.0.0.1:18083/ssrf-marker   # connection refused / fail
    docker compose ps                            # internal-admin has NO host port mapping
    
  3. Send the request named POST image-prefetch DNS rebinding trigger from requests.http, or with curl:
    curl -i -X POST http://127.0.0.1:18082/v1/chat/completions \
      -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
      -d '{
        "model": "ollama-local/gemma3",
        "messages": [{"role":"user","content":[
          {"type":"text","text":"reproduction image-prefetch trigger"},
          {"type":"image_url","image_url":{"url":"http://rebind.9r.test:8080/ssrf-marker?case=rebind-trigger"}}
        ]}],
        "stream": false
      }'
    

Impact

  • SSRF to internal HTTP services reachable from the 9router host/container.
  • Depending on the environment, this can reach cloud metadata endpoints, internal admin panels, or be used for internal service discovery.
  • Blind / semi-blind SSRF when the fetched response is not returned to the attacker; an exfil variant (pointing the image at an internal endpoint that returns valid image bytes) can return internal content base64-encoded to the upstream.
  • Requires a code path that prefetches/normalizes remote images for vision-capable providers.
  • No real credential is needed for the reproduction.

Suggested Fix

  • Pin the resolved IP after validation and connect to that IP (resolve once, then reuse the address for the fetch).
  • Block private, loopback, link-local, multicast, and cloud-metadata ranges at connect time, not only at validation time.
  • Perform DNS resolution and IP checks immediately before the request and against the address actually used to connect.
  • Disable redirects, or re-validate every redirect target with the same checks.
  • Enforce an allowlist for image-fetch domains where feasible.
  • Add a timeout, a response size limit, and a content-type check.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
📦npm9routerall versions0.5.2npm install 9router@0.5.2

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for 9router, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update 9router to 0.5.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-56676 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Restrict outbound requests from the affected component to an allowlist of hosts, block access to link-local and internal address ranges at the network layer, and require authentication on internal services so a forged request cannot reach them unauthenticated.

Frequently Asked Questions

## Summary 9router validates image URLs by resolving the host before fetching, but the later server-side fetch performs a separate DNS resolution. An attacker-controlled DNS name can resolve to a public IP during validation and then rebind to an internal Docker/private IP during the fetch. This allows the server-side image prefetch to reach internal-only HTTP services (SSRF). ## Details - **Affected version / commit:** 9router `v0.4.80` @ `b282f05`. - **Reachable through** `/v1/chat/completions` with a **vision-capable model** and an `image_url` content part. A vision-capable model name i
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-56676 in your dependencies?

Find it across npm, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-56676: 9router SSRF — Fixed in 0.5.2