Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐘
🐘 Packagist
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-55703 — snipe/snipe-it

MEDIUMFix: grokability/snipe-it@69c50aa

CVE-2026-55703 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) CWE-862 vulnerability in snipe/snipe-it. A fix is available for snipe/snipe-it — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Snipe-IT: Maintenance Record Disclosure via Missing Authorization on GET

Also known asGHSA-r9r3-g9fp-3q4q
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 3, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

Proof-of-concept exploit code exists

  • CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-55703.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.3%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs25th percentile — riskier than 25% of all scored CVEsHighest risk

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-55703 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 382,574 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐘snipe/snipe-it

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Packagist packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Impact

Any activated account in a company can read every maintenance record for that company (asset tag, supplier, purchase cost, free-text notes, dates) without holding any asset or maintenance permission.

Summary

MaintenancesController::show() renders a maintenance record without any authorization check. Every other action in the controller authorizes against the asset; show() does not. Any user in the asset's company can read maintenance detail (asset tag, supplier, purchase cost, notes, dates) by visiting /maintenances/{id}, regardless of permissions.

Details

public function show(Maintenance $maintenance): View|RedirectResponse
{
    return view('maintenances.view')->with('maintenance', $maintenance);
}

No authorize() call. The sibling actions all gate on the asset: index() calls authorize('view', Asset::class) (line 33), and edit()/update()/destroy() call authorize('update', $maintenance->asset) (lines 139, 166, 286). The route is registered with only the auth guard:

Route::resource('maintenances', MaintenancesController::class, ['middleware' => ['auth']]);

(routes/web/hardware.php:185). Route-model binding still applies the company scope, so the read is bounded to the caller's company; the absent permission gate is the defect. Maintenance IDs are sequential and visible in the record URL.

Proof of concept

  1. As an administrator, create an asset in a company (here, CompanyA). Open the asset, choose Maintenances > Create, and add a record: name MntA2, supplier SupA, a purchase cost, and notes. The saved record opens at /maintenances/{id}.
  2. As the administrator, create a test user assigned to CompanyA, with every permission left unchecked. Activate the account.
  3. In a separate browser session, log in as the test user. Confirm it is unprivileged: the Assets and Maintenances navigation items are absent, and browsing to /hardware returns 403.
  4. In the address bar, browse to http://<host>/maintenances/{id}.

Observed: the maintenance view renders in full for the unprivileged account.

GET /maintenances/5      ->  HTTP 200 OK
Renders the "Maintenance" detail page for MntA2:
  Asset: AssetA   Supplier: SupA   Cost: <value>   Notes: <text>   Dates: <...>

GET /hardware            ->  HTTP 403  (same account, asset list is gated)
GET /maintenances        ->  HTTP 403  (same account, maintenance list is gated)
GET /maintenances/2      ->  HTTP 302  (record in CompanyB; company scope still hides it)
  • The test account holds zero permissions and still reads the record.
  • Only the unguarded show route leaks: the list view and the asset pages return 403 for the same account.
  • A maintenance in a different company (CompanyB) redirects away, confirming the FMCS company scope still holds.

Patches

Patched in https://github.com/grokability/snipe-it/commit/69c50aa2aee25f837626556b4f4f3d05ec7ace96

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐘Packagistsnipe/snipe-itall versions8.6.3composer require snipe/snipe-it:^8.6.3

Affected Products

1 product · 1 configurations
Application
snipe-itsnipeitapp
< 8.6.3
range

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for snipe/snipe-it, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update snipe/snipe-it to 8.6.3 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-55703 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Impact Any activated account in a company can read every maintenance record for that company (asset tag, supplier, purchase cost, free-text notes, dates) without holding any asset or maintenance permission. ## Summary `MaintenancesController::show()` renders a maintenance record without any authorization check. Every other action in the controller authorizes against the asset; `show()` does not. Any user in the asset's company can read maintenance detail (asset tag, supplier, purchase cost, notes, dates) by visiting `/maintenances/{id}`, regardless of permissions. ## Details ```php pub
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-55703 in your dependencies?

Find it across Packagist, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-55703: Fixed in 8.6.3 (Medium 4.3) | O3 Security