CVE-2026-55540 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.1) Path Traversal vulnerability in praisonai. A fix is available for praisonai — see the affected versions and patch details below.
PraisonAI: [Path Traversal] agent tools escape the configured workspace via symlinks
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-55540.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-55540 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 385,386 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
praisonaiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
PraisonAI's praisonai.code tool wrappers (exported as CODE_TOOLS for agents) expose a workspace setting that the module itself treats as a path-traversal security boundary — read_file, write_file, apply_diff, and search_replace explicitly call is_path_within_directory() and return "… is outside the workspace" on violations. That boundary is enforced unsoundly and inconsistently:
- The containment helper uses
os.path.abspath(), notrealpath()/Path.resolve(). A symlink located inside the workspace whose target is outside has anabspath()that is still inside the workspace, so it passes the check whileopen()follows the link. This bypasses read, write, apply_diff, and search_replace (CWE-59). list_files()resolvespathagainst the workspace but never calls the containment helper at all —../and absolute paths escape directly (CWE-22).execute_command()takes aworkspaceargument documented "for security validation" but performs nocwdcontainment check;code_execute_command()resolves a relativecwdagainst the workspace and also never validates it (and never even passesworkspaceto the low-level helper). A relativecwd="../outside"runs commands from outside the workspace (CWE-22). An attacker who can influence an agent that has these tools attached (untrusted prompt, indirect prompt injection, or a server-exposed agent) can read, overwrite, list, and execute from outside the configured workspace, bounded only by the process user's filesystem permissions.
Technical Detail
1. Unsound containment helper (symlink bypass — CWE-59)
# src/praisonai/praisonai/code/utils/file_utils.py — is_path_within_directory()
abs_file = os.path.abspath(file_path) # does NOT resolve symlinks
abs_dir = os.path.abspath(directory)
if not abs_dir.endswith(os.sep): abs_dir += os.sep
return abs_file.startswith(abs_dir) or abs_file == abs_dir.rstrip(os.sep)
read_file/write_file/apply_diff/search_replace call this with the configured workspace (e.g. read_file.py: # Security check - ensure path is within workspace). Because abspath() does not canonicalize symlinks, a link at WORKSPACE/link_to_secret.txt → /outside/secret.txt has abspath WORKSPACE/link_to_secret.txt (inside) and passes, while open() follows it to the real outside target.
2. list_files() has no containment check (CWE-22)
# src/praisonai/praisonai/code/tools/list_files.py
if workspace and not os.path.isabs(path):
abs_path = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(workspace, path)) # ../ collapses out of workspace
else:
abs_path = os.path.abspath(path) # absolute path used as-is
# ... os.path.isdir(abs_path) then listed. is_path_within_directory() is NEVER called.
3. execute_command() never validates cwd (CWE-22)
# src/praisonai/praisonai/code/tools/execute_command.py — workspace param doc: "for security validation"
if cwd:
if workspace and not os.path.isabs(cwd):
work_dir = os.path.abspath(os.path.join(workspace, cwd)) # ../ escapes; no containment check
else:
work_dir = os.path.abspath(cwd)
# subprocess.run(args, cwd=work_dir, ...) # no is_path_within_directory() anywhere
# src/praisonai/praisonai/code/agent_tools.py — code_execute_command()
if work_dir and _workspace_root and not os.path.isabs(work_dir):
work_dir = os.path.join(_workspace_root, work_dir) # joins, never validates
result = _execute_command(command=command, cwd=work_dir, timeout=120) # workspace not even passed
Note: execute_command rejects shell=True and runs shlex.split(command) via subprocess.run (no shell), so shell metacharacters (&&, >, pipes) do not work — but any binary still runs with attacker-chosen argv from the escaped cwd, which is sufficient to read/write outside the workspace.
The workspace is an intended boundary (pre-empts "by design")
The module asserts this control itself: read_file.py "Security check - ensure path is within workspace"; write_file.py "default workspace is cwd so relative paths cannot escape"; is_path_within_directory docstring "(prevents path traversal)"; execute_command workspace param "for security validation". The bug is that the asserted control is unsound (abspath vs realpath) and not applied to list_files/execute_command cwd.
Proof of Concept
Self-contained, local temp fixtures only; no network, no untrusted commands. Real praisonai.code agent tools were called.
workspace = /tmp/.../workspace outside = /tmp/.../outside
[1] baseline plain ../ read -> BLOCKED: "Path '../outside/secret.txt' is outside the workspace"
[2] symlink read (in-WS link) -> SUCCESS: returned "SECRET_OUTSIDE_WORKSPACE"
[3] symlink write (in-WS link) -> SUCCESS: outside file now contains "OVERWRITTEN_VIA_SYMLINK"
[4] code_list_files("../outside") -> SUCCESS: "Contents of ../outside: 📄 secret.txt"
[5] code_execute_command(cwd="../outside","pwd") -> SUCCESS: stdout "/tmp/.../outside"
[6] code_execute_command(cwd="../outside", python3 -c open('planted.txt','w')...)
-> SUCCESS: new file created OUTSIDE workspace, "PWNED_OUTSIDE_WORKSPACE"
Steps 2–6 each cross the configured workspace boundary; step 1 shows the plain-../ guard that the symlink and unscoped vectors bypass.
Impact
- Confidentiality: read files outside the workspace (in-workspace symlink; or list/enumerate outside dirs via
list_files). - Integrity: overwrite outside files via symlink; create/modify files outside the workspace via
execute_commandrunning in an escaped cwd. - Execution boundary: run arbitrary available binaries (argv-controlled) from a directory outside the workspace. Bounded by the process user's permissions. In a code-agent or server-exposed agent processing untrusted input, this exposes secrets / project-adjacent / host files and breaks the project-boundary integrity guarantee the workspace setting advertises.
Suggested Fix
- Replace
is_path_within_directory()with arealpath()/Path.resolve()-based containment check, and compare withos.path.commonpath()rather thanstartswith. - Apply that check consistently to every file path, directory path, backup path, diff/search-replace target, and command working directory, after full canonicalization (resolve the symlink's real target, not the link path).
list_files(): reject absolute paths and../escapes whenworkspaceis set.execute_command(): validatecwdcontainment whenworkspaceis set;code_execute_command()should pass_workspace_rootto the low-level helper or validate itself.- Regression tests: symlink read/write/diff/search-replace to outside targets;
list_files("../outside", workspace=…);execute_command(cwd="../outside", workspace=…); absolute outside paths with a workspace set.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | praisonai | all versions | 4.6.58pip install --upgrade 'praisonai==4.6.58' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonai, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update praisonai to 4.6.58 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-55540 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-55540 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.