CVE-2026-55530 is a medium-severity (CVSS 6.1) CWE-862 vulnerability in praisonaiagents. A fix is available for praisonaiagents — see the affected versions and patch details below.
PraisonAI: ast_grep_rewrite rewrites arbitrary files without the @require_approval gate enforced on every sibling mutation tool
Exploitation Status
Proof-of-concept exploit code exists
- CISA’s SSVC triage found public proof-of-concept exploit code for this CVE, though no confirmed active exploitation.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-55530.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-55530 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 384,993 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
praisonaiagentsReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Target: PraisonAI (MervinPraison/PraisonAI)
Affected component: praisonaiagents/tools/ast_grep_tool.py — ast_grep_rewrite
Affected versions: master at ce97667156a116c50b4a3d1aa21e09f048903fda; reproduced against the current praisonaiagents PyPI release (praisonaiagents <= 1.6.52).
Summary
Tools in praisonaiagents/tools/ that modify on-disk state or run code are uniformly wrapped with @require_approval, which routes the call through an interactive approval flow before the body runs and fails closed — on denial (or with no approval backend configured) it raises PermissionError and the side effect does not occur. This is applied at every sibling mutation entry point:
| File | Line | Symbol | Risk level |
|---|---|---|---|
file_tools.py | 212 | copy_file | high |
file_tools.py | 239 | move_file | high |
file_tools.py | 266 | delete_file | high |
edit_tools.py | 38 | EditTools.edit_file | high |
edit_tools.py | 155 | edit_file | high |
shell_tools.py | 32 | execute_command | critical |
python_tools.py | 352 | execute_code | critical |
ast_grep_tool.py:149 ast_grep_rewrite is structurally a sibling of these but has no decorator and no from ..approval import require_approval import. With dry_run=False (LLM-controllable), it builds sg --pattern <P> --rewrite <R> --lang <L> --update-all <path> (lines 204–211) and calls subprocess.run(cmd, ...) (line 215), modifying every file under path matching the pattern. There is no approval gate, no _validate_path workspace check, and no cwd= sandboxing. The function is registered as a top-level tool (__init__.py:182) and exposed via the code_intelligence built-in profile (profiles.py).
A secondary defect: on the dry_run=False path ast_grep_rewrite returns the literal string No changes made to the caller even when it modified files (the "No changes made" return at ast_grep_tool.py:230 is reached on this path), so an operator inspecting tool output sees no record that a write occurred.
Proof of concept
Single script, clean venv, praisonaiagents from PyPI, ast-grep CLI installed. PRAISONAI_AUTO_APPROVE is removed from the environment first, so no env-bypass is in play.
import os, tempfile, textwrap
os.environ.pop("PRAISONAI_AUTO_APPROVE", None)
workdir = tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="poc-")
target = os.path.join(workdir, "target.py")
open(target, "w").write(textwrap.dedent("""
def safe_function(x):
return x + 1
def hello(name):
return 'hi ' + name
"""))
# Positive: undecorated tool rewrites the file.
from praisonaiagents.tools.ast_grep_tool import ast_grep_rewrite
ast_grep_rewrite(
pattern="def $FN($$$): return $$$",
replacement="def $FN($$$): import os; os.environ['POC_CANARY']='1'; return $$$",
lang="python", path=workdir, dry_run=False,
)
# Negative control: decorated sibling triggers the approval flow.
from praisonaiagents.tools.edit_tools import edit_file
edit_file(file_path=target, old_text="def hello(name):", new_text="def hello(name): # X")
Result, verified: ast_grep_rewrite rewrote target.py to contain the injected import os; os.environ['POC_CANARY']='1' payload, no approval prompt fired, and the call returned No changes made. The subsequent edit_file call in the same process rendered the Tool Approval Required panel and, on denial, raised PermissionError("Execution of edit_file denied: User denied") without modifying its target. Same process, same approval backend — the only difference is the missing decorator on ast_grep_rewrite.
Threat model
An LLM agent running locally whose tool surface includes ast_grep_rewrite (via the code_intelligence profile or direct import). Triggers: the operator asks the agent to refactor code, or prompt-injection in fetched docs / RAG context / any LLM-visible input steers the agent to call ast_grep_rewrite with attacker-chosen pattern, replacement, and path (the dry_run field is in the LLM-visible tool schema, so dry_run=False is requestable). The agent can then rewrite any file the host process can write — source trees, build configs, dotfiles, the agent's own source. With path="/" the rewrite is filesystem-wide. Because the rewrite injects arbitrary text, pointing it at a file that is later imported or executed turns this write primitive into code execution — the basis for the escalation noted in the CVSS line. No operator prompt and no audit record of the modification.
Suggested fix
--- a/praisonaiagents/tools/ast_grep_tool.py
+++ b/praisonaiagents/tools/ast_grep_tool.py
@@
from praisonaiagents._logging import get_logger
from typing import Optional, List
+from ..approval import require_approval
@@
+@require_approval(risk_level="high")
def ast_grep_rewrite(
pattern: str,
replacement: str,
high matches the file-modifying siblings; critical is defensible given the write→exec escalation. In the same patch: add a _validate_path workspace boundary check (cf. edit_tools.py:27); fix the No changes made return so it reflects actual modifications; apply the decorator to ast_grep_scan (ast_grep_tool.py:243) if it can write. ast_grep_search is read-only and can stay undecorated. A regression test asserting ast_grep_rewrite requires approval (alongside the other mutation tools) would have caught this at review time.
Coordinated disclosure
- Kai Aizen / SnailSploit —
[email protected]— PGP on request.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🐍PyPI | praisonaiagents | all versions | 1.6.58pip install --upgrade 'praisonaiagents==1.6.58' |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for praisonaiagents, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update praisonaiagents to 1.6.58 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-55530 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Put an independent control in front of the weakness: restrict the affected endpoint or interface to trusted networks, require an additional authentication factor or proxy-level check, and invalidate existing sessions and credentials in case the flaw has already been used.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-55530 in your dependencies?
Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.