CVE-2026-55466 — snipe-it

Impact

A low-privilege user can store an active-content payload as an asset attachment and have it served inline, same-origin, with an active Content-Type, achieving stored XSS. The application sanitizes uploads only when PHP finfo detects image/svg+xml. By submitting an XHTML document whose finfo MIME is text/xml (an allowed extension), the svg-sanitize branch is skipped, the <script> is stored raw, and the inline-serve path returns it as text/xml; charset=utf-8 with Content-Disposition: inline — which the browser renders as a live XHTML document and executes. The dedicated StorageHelper::allowSafeInline() whitelist that should have constrained inline-renderable types is never wired into the serve path.

Details

Vulnerable code — sanitizer keyed on finfo MIME app/Http/Requests/UploadFileRequest.php:46-53

$extension = $file->getClientOriginalExtension();
$file_name = $name_prefix.'-'.str_random(8).'-'.str_slug(...).'.'.$file->guessExtension();
...
if ($file->getMimeType() === 'image/svg+xml') {
    $uploaded_file = $this->handleSVG($file);   // svg-sanitize fires
} else {
    $uploaded_file = file_get_contents($file);   // stored RAW — no sanitization
}

Vulnerable code — inline serve, no allowSafeInline() app/Http/Controllers/UploadedFilesController.php:103

if (request('inline') == 'true') {
    $headers = ['Content-Disposition' => 'inline'];
    return Storage::download($path.$log->filename, $log->filename, $headers);
}

StorageHelper::allowSafeInline() (app/Helpers/StorageHelper.php:88) exists to whitelist inline-renderable types but is not called here. The validation rule (UploadFileRequest::rules()) is mimes: over config('filesystems.allowed_upload_extensions_for_validator'), which includes svg, xml, and txt — so a text/xml file passes validation and bypasses the SVG sanitizer simultaneously.

POC

1. From a fresh install, as a user with only assets.view + assets.files targeting any existing asset created by admin
2. click on the asset created by admin and upload files.
3. create a XML file with the following payload and upload it.

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head><script>alert(document.cookie)</script></head>
<body>hi</body>
</html>

1. Noticed that it did not receive any error and the file was uploaded.
2. Now, can just get the URL and view it. (need to add the inline=true). image.png

Notice that the XSS was able to request document.cookie. This means that it is possible for low privilege user to perform XSS and perform privilege escalation to admin.