CVE-2026-54617 is a critical-severity (CVSS 9.8) Path Traversal vulnerability in pro.gravit.launcher:launchserver-api. No vendor fix is recorded yet; mitigation options are listed below.
GravitLauncher: Unauthenticated path traversal in LaunchServer FileServerHandler
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- A successful exploit gives an attacker total control of the affected component, not partial access.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-54617.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-54617 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 385,987 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
pro.gravit.launcher:launchserver-apiReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
An unauthenticated path traversal in the LaunchServer HTTP file server (FileServerHandler) lets any remote actor read any file readable by the LaunchServer process (e.g. ../../../../etc/passwd). This is a generic arbitrary-file-read primitive, so the fix must address the traversal itself, not any specific file.
The readable files include the server's own secrets, which turns this from information disclosure into full compromise: the ECDSA private key that signs access JWTs (.keys/ecdsa_id), the refresh-token salt (.keys/legacySalt), and LaunchServer.json (database credentials). With the signing key an attacker mints a valid access token for any account, including admins. That is a full authentication bypass. Pre-auth, default config, port 9274.
Affected: GravitLauncher LaunchServer ≤ 5.7.11 (the LaunchServer application; the published pro.gravit.launcher:*-api Maven artifacts do not contain the vulnerable code).
Details
In FileServerHandler.channelRead0:
path = Paths.get(IOHelper.getPathFromUrlFragment(uri)).normalize().toString().substring(1); // line 194
File file = base.resolve(path).toFile(); // line 200 - no second normalize()
substring(1) blindly strips a leading slash, assuming the request-target always starts with /. Netty's HttpServerCodec accepts a request-target without a leading slash verbatim (decoderResult().isSuccess() == true). For such a target, normalize() cannot collapse the leading .., substring(1) turns ../ into ./ (leaving the remaining ..), and base.resolve(path), which is not re-normalized, resolves outside updatesDir.
file.isHidden() (line 201) is checked only on the final path component, so targets that don't start with a dot (ecdsa_id, rsa_id, legacySalt, LaunchServer.json) are served even with showHiddenFiles=false.
The file server is enabled by default (netty.fileServerEnabled=true) and bound to 0.0.0.0:9274. No auth handler precedes FileServerHandler; WebSocketServerProtocolHandler("/api") forwards non-WebSocket / non-/api requests down to it, so the attack is a plain HTTP GET (no WebSocket).
PoC
Reproduced on a from-source build of v5.7.11 (Netty 4.2.12).
Must use a raw socket. curl/browsers/HTTP libraries normalize the path and prepend /, hitting the safe branch (false "not reproducible").
printf 'GET ../../.keys/ecdsa_id HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: x\r\n\r\n' | nc <host> 9274
Returns the raw ECDSA private-key bytes. Same for ../../.keys/rsa_id, ../../.keys/legacySalt, ../../LaunchServer.json. %2e%2e/... (no leading slash) also works. Depth-robust arbitrary read: ../../../../../../etc/passwd.
Control (confirms the root cause): GET /../../.keys/ecdsa_id (WITH leading slash) → 404. Only the no-leading-slash form escapes.
Impact
Unauthenticated remote read of any file the process can access. What that exposes:
.keys/ecdsa_id: the key that signs access JWTs. With it, an attacker mints a valid token for any account, including admins, so this is a full authentication bypass..keys/legacySalt: lets an attacker forge refresh tokens.LaunchServer.json: database credentials.- Any other file readable by the process (config, logs, system files).
Deployment note: a normalizing L7 reverse proxy (stock nginx location / { proxy_pass ...; }) rejects the no-leading-slash request (400) and collapses leading-slash traversal, blocking the primary vector. But the default bind is 0.0.0.0:9274, so protection relies on firewalling the backend port; L4/TCP proxies (HAProxy TCP, nginx stream, CF Spectrum) and direct exposure remain exploitable.
Suggested fix
- Re-
normalize()afterbase.resolve(path)and verifyresolved.startsWith(base). - Reject request-targets that don't start with
/(400). - Default-bind to
127.0.0.1; store.keysoutsideupdatesDir.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | pro.gravit.launcher:launchserver-api | all versions | No fix |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for pro.gravit.launcher:launchserver-api, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Remediation status
No patched version of pro.gravit.launcher:launchserver-api has shipped for CVE-2026-54617 yet. Where your build allows, override or pin the dependency away from the vulnerable range, and apply any maintainer-recommended mitigation.
Mitigate without a patch
Resolve every user-supplied path to its canonical form and reject anything that escapes the intended directory, and run the component under an account that has no read or write access outside the directory it legitimately serves.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-54617 in your dependencies?
Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.