Your RSA-2048 keys break in 2030. Find every one of them before attackers do.
🐍
🐍 PyPI
Not in CISA KEV
MEDIUM severity

CVE-2026-53954 — bugsink

MEDIUMFix: bugsink/bugsink@1d0539f

CVE-2026-53954 is a medium-severity (CVSS 4.3) Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability in bugsink. A fix is available for bugsink — see the affected versions and patch details below.

Bugsink: DOS using large numbers of event tags

Also known asGHSA-5x67-j5xg-c5gjPYSEC-2026-2403
Published
Updated
Affected
1 pkg
Patched
1 / 1
Exploits
None indexed
Exploitation data as of Oct 7, 2026 · OSV.dev, NVD, FIRST.org (EPSS)

Exploitation Status

No confirmed exploitation observed yet

  • CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.

Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-53954.

EPSS Exploitation Probability

via FIRST.org ↗
0.6%probability of exploitation in next 30 days
Lower Risk0.00%
Lower risk than most CVEs45th percentile — riskier than 45% of all scored CVEsHighest risk
0.06%0.39%0.73%1.06%0.6%0.6%Oct 26Oct 26

Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.

How urgent is this, really

CVE-2026-53954 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.

Where this sits among everything scored

Of 390,807 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.

Real-World Exposure

1 pkg affected
🐍bugsink

Real-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects PyPI packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.

Description

Summary

In affected versions, Bugsink stores every tag supplied with an incoming event. An event with an unusually large number of custom (i.e. supplied by an attacker) tags can therefore make ingestion spend more time than intended writing tag rows.

Bugsink uses a single-writer database architecture. That keeps the implementation simple, but it also means one expensive write transaction can delay other event digestion while it is running. In this case, it makes ingestion of other events wait until the transaction that writes the tags finishes, which effectively causes a temporary denial of service for other events.

Impact

Submitting such an event requires a valid project DSN. DSNs are sometimes visible in client-side applications, so they should not be treated as a strong security boundary, but the issue is still limited to ingestion for a Bugsink instance that accepts the event.

The impact is availability-only. The issue does not expose stored data, modify existing events, or allow code execution.

Mitigation

Update to version 2.2.2, which caps the number of tags stored for a single event. The default cap is 100 tags and can be changed with MAX_EVENT_TAGS.

Affected Packages

1 total 1 fixed
EcosystemPackageVulnerable rangeFix
🐍PyPIbugsinkall versions2.2.2pip install --upgrade 'bugsink==2.2.2'

Detection & mitigation playbook

Open-source dependency
  1. Detect

    Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for bugsink, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.

  2. Fix

    Update bugsink to 2.2.2 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-53954 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.

  3. Workarounds

    Cap what an attacker can consume: apply request size, rate and timeout limits in front of the affected component, and run it with memory and CPU limits so exhaustion degrades one worker rather than the whole service.

Frequently Asked Questions

### Summary In affected versions, Bugsink stores every tag supplied with an incoming event. An event with an unusually large number of custom (i.e. supplied by an attacker) tags can therefore make ingestion spend more time than intended writing tag rows. Bugsink uses a single-writer database architecture. That keeps the implementation simple, but it also means one expensive write transaction can delay other event digestion while it is running. In this case, it makes ingestion of other events wait until the transaction that writes the tags finishes, which effectively causes a temporary denial
O3 Security · Impact-Aware SCA

Is CVE-2026-53954 in your dependencies?

Find it across PyPI, including transitive dependencies.

CVE-2026-53954: bugsink — Fixed in 2.2.2