CVE-2026-53752 is a high-severity (CVSS 7.5) CWE-674 vulnerability in org.docx4j:docx4j-core. A fix is available for org.docx4j:docx4j-core — see the affected versions and patch details below.
docx4j: Stack Overflow via Cyclic `w:basedOn` Style Chain leads to Denial of Service
Exploitation Status
No confirmed exploitation observed yet
- CISA assesses this as automatable — exploitation doesn’t require manual, per-target effort, which raises the odds of mass scanning and opportunistic attacks.
- CISA’s own triage has not observed active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code for this CVE as of its last assessment.
Exploitation and automatability from CISA’s SSVC triage for CVE-2026-53752.
EPSS Exploitation Probability
Probability of exploitation in the next 30 days, from FIRST.org EPSS.
How urgent is this, really
CVE-2026-53752 by exploitation likelihood (EPSS) against impact (CVSS). Outside the shaded patch-first corner.
Where this sits among everything scored
Of 382,205 CVEs with a current EPSS score, this one falls in the < 10% band (highlighted). Counts from FIRST.org, log-scaled.
Real-World Exposure
org.docx4j:docx4j-coreReal-time download stats are indexed for npm and PyPI packages. This vulnerability affects Maven packages — download data is not available via public APIs for these ecosystems.
Description
Summary
docx4j's PropertyResolver and several adjacent helpers recursively walk the OpenXML style inheritance chain (w:basedOn) without cycle detection.
A WordprocessingML document containing a cyclic style chain (for example, Style A based on B and Style B based on A) causes unbounded recursion and a java.lang.StackOverflowError within the property-resolution code path.
These helpers are used by operations that require effective style resolution, including common conversion and TOC-related paths. As a result, most server-side pipelines that accept a user-supplied docx and process it through docx4j can likely be crashed by a file containing a cyclic style reference.
Details
Representative snippet: PropertyResolver.fillPPrStack
private void fillPPrStack(String styleId, Stack<PPr> pPrStack) {
Style style = liveStyles.get(styleId);
...
// if it is based on, recurse
if (style.getBasedOn() == null) {
log.debug("Style " + styleId + " is a root style.");
} else if (style.getBasedOn().getVal() != null) {
String basedOnStyleName = style.getBasedOn().getVal();
fillPPrStack(basedOnStyleName, pPrStack); // ← unbounded recursion
...
Impact
This is a denial of service against a server-side application that processes untrusted docx files via docx4j.
An upload causes the processing thread to be terminated with StackOverflowError which may crash the worker thread, degrade the thread pool, or evade normal per-request CPU and heap-memory safeguards in containers and serverless functions (because the failure mode is thread-stack exhaustion rather than gradual resource consumption).
The attack depends on the host application's access controls and requires no user interaction beyond submitting the file. Detection is difficult because the file is a well-formed OOXML package containing ordinary style elements, and passes standard antivirus and content-inspection rules.
Severity: High for server-side applications that process untrusted DOCX files using docx4j style/property resolution (unless the application catches StackOverflowError, isolates conversion in disposable worker processes, restarts workers cleanly, and the practical impact is only failure of one request). Severity may be Medium where document upload requires authentication, processing is isolated, or the failure is limited to a single request/worker.
Credits
Thanks to Koh You Liang (@Isopach) for responsibly disclosing this issue.
Affected Packages
| Ecosystem | Package | Vulnerable range | Fix |
|---|---|---|---|
| ☕Maven | org.docx4j:docx4j-core | all versions | 11.5.14org.docx4j:docx4j-core:11.5.14 |
Detection & mitigation playbook
Open-source dependencyDetect
Scan your dependency tree (package-lock.json, pnpm-lock.yaml, requirements.txt, go.sum, etc.) for org.docx4j:docx4j-core, including transitive dependencies — a direct dependency you never call can still pull in a vulnerable version.
Fix
Update org.docx4j:docx4j-core to 11.5.14 or later, then make sure no transitive (indirect) dependency still pins the vulnerable range — O3 confirms CVE-2026-53752 is resolved across your whole dependency graph.
Workarounds
Stop feeding it untrusted input: reject or quarantine files and payloads from unverified sources until you can upgrade, restrict accepted formats to the ones you actually need, and run the parsing or decoding step in a least-privileged sandbox or short-lived worker so a crash or corrupted read cannot reach the rest of the process.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is CVE-2026-53752 in your dependencies?
Find it across Maven, including transitive dependencies.